ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

What do ancient DNA from Australia and Asia show about how people left Africa?

Research question: What do ancient genomes from Sahul (Australia and New Guinea) and Southeast Asia show about the timing and routes of the earliest dispersal out of Africa?

Genomic evidence supports the long chronology for the peopling of Sahul 1, and a genetic study places first arrival in Australia around 60,000 years ago via two routes 78. The two groups separated in South or Southeast Asia several thousand years before moving further east 19: one moved south into present-day Australia, and another went through the northern corridor, likely via the Philippines, toward New Guinea 13. The ancestors of Aboriginal Australians and New Guineans were part of a larger group that left Africa some 70,000 to 80,000 years ago 16, although the same dataset supports a single major out-of-Africa movement between 50,000 and 70,000 years ago 23. The sources do not settle whether earlier dispersals as early as 120 ka occurred 2, and the authors call for more ancient DNA and better southern Asian fossil records to resolve timing and routes 21. The newest fact in this set dates to December 1, 2025 13, about ten months before October 2026.

Checked 2026-10-20. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
Genomic evidence supports the "long chronology" for the peopling of Sahul.
"Genomic evidence supports the “long chronology” for the peopling of Sahul"
Genomic evidence supports the “long chronology” for the peopling of Sahul
[2] supported
Some researchers have argued for one or more earlier dispersals out of Africa, possibly as early as 120 ka.
"Some have argued that human genetic, fossil, and archaeological data indicate one or more prior dispersals, possibly as early as 120 ka."
When did Homo sapiens first reach Southeast Asia and Sahul? (2018)
[3] supported
Sahul (Australia, Tasmania and New Guinea) was colonized from Sunda by anatomically modern Homo sapiens more than 50,000 years ago.
"Sahul, comprising Australia, Tasmania, and New Guinea was colonized from Sunda, the enlarged southernmost extension of Eurasia, by anatomically modern Homo sapiens over 50,000 years ago."
The Peopling of Sahul and Near Oceania (2014)
[4] supported
Pleistocene colonization of Sahul required watercraft to cross the perpetual island region of Wallacea.
"Pleistocene colonization of Sahul required watercraft to cross the perpetual island region of Wallacea, wherein populations adjusted to changing patterns of floral and faunal diversity."
The Peopling of Sahul and Near Oceania (2014)
[5] supported
Ancient DNA and skeletal studies indicate that Sahul was largely isolated from other populations after its colonization.
"Ancient DNA and skeletal studies indicate that after colonization, Sahul was largely isolated from other populations."
The Peopling of Sahul and Near Oceania (2014)
[6] supported
The earliest humans reached Near Oceania, the islands northeast of New Guinea, approximately 45,000 years ago.
"The earliest humans to inhabit Near Oceania, the islands northeast of New Guinea, arrived approximately 45,000 years ago."
The Peopling of Sahul and Near Oceania (2014)
[7] supported
The first humans entered Sahul, the ancient landmass of Australia and New Guinea, around 60,000 years ago from parts of Southeast Asia.
"lends credence to the theory that the first humans entered Sahul around 60,000 years ago from parts of Southeast Asia."
Humans first entered Australia 60,000 years ago via two routes, DNA analysis suggests
[8] supported
The two genetic groups split around the time they entered Sahul and took separate routes: a northern route into New Guinea and a southern route into Australia from Sundaland.
"taking two separate routes: a northern route into New Guinea and a southern route into Australia from the ancient landmass of Sundaland."
Humans first entered Australia 60,000 years ago via two routes, DNA analysis suggests
[9] supported
Recent archaeological and genetic data from eastern and western Eurasia and from Australia are beginning to challenge the view that the early MIS-5 dispersal was abortive.
"Recent archaeological and genetic data from both western and eastern parts of Eurasia and from Australia are starting to challenge that interpretation."
The success of failed Homo sapiens dispersals out of Africa and into Asia (2018)
[10] supported
The earliest settlers had to cross up to 100 km of open water to reach their new settlements, which the authors present as evidence of early seafaring.
"Maybe even more surprising is that these groups had to cross up to 100 km of water to get to their new settlements—providing evidence of early seafaring ."
Humans first entered Australia 60,000 years ago via two routes, DNA analysis suggests
[11] supported
The oldest Southeast Asian Homo sapiens fossils come from Tam Pa Ling cave in Laos, dated to roughly 65-45 ka.
"In Southeast Asia, the oldest fossils are from the cave of Tam Pa Ling in Laos, and date to ~ 65-45 ka.29"
Rethinking the dispersal of Homo sapiens out of Africa (2015)
[12] supported
The early MIS-5 dispersal may have covered a much wider geographic area and lasted much longer than previously thought.
"This Perspective reviews the current evidence for a scenario where the MIS-5 dispersal encompassed a much greater geographic distribution and temporal duration."
The success of failed Homo sapiens dispersals out of Africa and into Asia (2018)
[13] supported
Genetic analysis points to two distinct migration routes from Sunda into Sahul: one moving southward from the Indonesian islands into present-day Australia, and another through the northern corridor, most likely via the Philippines, toward New Guinea.
"Their results point to two distinct migration routes: one moving southward from the Indonesian islands into present-day Australia and another traveling through the northern corridor, most likely through the Philippines, toward New Guinea."
New genetic study reveals how modern humans first arrived in Australia 60,000 years ago
[14] supported
Modeling of exposed island chains from the MIS4 period suggests the likely arrival points were the Bird's Head peninsula of West New Guinea and the northwest Sahul shelf.
"modeling of exposed MIS4 island chains suggests that the likely arrival points were the Bird's Head peninsula of West New Guinea and the northwest Sahul shelf."
Humans first entered Australia 60,000 years ago via two routes, DNA analysis suggests
[15] supported
In Australia, archaeological evidence indicates Homo sapiens were present by about 50 ka, and the earliest secure fossil evidence dates to about 45 ka.
"In Australia archaeological data indicates the presence of Homo sapiens by ~50 ka, with the earliest secure fossil evidence dating to ~45 ka."
Rethinking the dispersal of Homo sapiens out of Africa (2015)
[16] supported
The ancestors of Aboriginal Australians and New Guineans and those of the wider population that left Africa were part of a larger group that migrated out of Africa some 70,000 to 80,000 years ago.
"These two groups were part of a larger population that migrated out of Africa some 70,000 to 80,000 years ago."
New genetic study reveals how modern humans first arrived in Australia 60,000 years ago
[17] supported
The preferred molecular clock method in the study produced time ranges that coincide with the long chronology for human arrival in Sahul.
"the preferred method in this study resulted in time ranges that coincide with the long chronology."
Humans first entered Australia 60,000 years ago via two routes, DNA analysis suggests
[18] supported
Taken together, the data indicate Homo sapiens were in Southwest Asia by about 120 ka and in Southeast Asia by about 50 ka.
"Cumulatively these data demonstrate that Homo sapiens were in Southwest Asia by ~120 ka and Southeast Asia by ~50 ka."
Rethinking the dispersal of Homo sapiens out of Africa (2015)
[19] supported
The two groups separated in South or Southeast Asia several thousand years before they moved further east.
"Genetic evidence suggests that these groups separated somewhere in South or Southeast Asia several thousand years before they moved further east."
New genetic study reveals how modern humans first arrived in Australia 60,000 years ago
[20] supported
The older c. 65,000-year estimate for Madjedbebe has been questioned by some experts, while the 50,000-year age has been widely accepted since the 1990s.
"While the age of 50,000 years ago has been widely accepted since the 1990s, this latter estimate (of ca. 65,000 years ago) has, as of 2017, been questioned by some experts."
Madjedbebe
[21] supported
The authors argue that more ancient DNA sequencing, alongside better southern Asian fossil and archaeological records, is needed to resolve the dispersal timing and routes.
"The enhancement of the southern Asian fossil and archaeological records remain critical, alongside the application of more ancient DNA sequencing."
Rethinking the dispersal of Homo sapiens out of Africa (2015)
[22] supported
Madjedbebe is the oldest known site showing human presence in Australia.
"Madjedbebe is the oldest known site showing the presence of humans in Australia."
Madjedbebe
[23] supported
The new dataset supports a single major movement out of Africa between 50,000 and 70,000 years ago.
"the new dataset supports a single major movement between 50,000 and 70,000 years ago."
New genetic study reveals how modern humans first arrived in Australia 60,000 years ago