ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

Did Armand, Hernandez, and Pham get different fines and bans in court?

Research question: Do the final judgments and court approval orders for Armand, Hernandez, and Pham show approved disgorgement amounts, penalties, and bar durations, and how do those remedies compare across the individual defendants?

The records show that Armand and Hernandez consented to bifurcated settlements with permanent injunctions and officer-and-director bars, but the disgorgement and penalty amounts were left for the court to determine 1. The Pham judgment, entered March 25, 2025, required disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest, while the civil penalty was left to be set on a future Commission motion 56. A March 31, 2026 entry says the SEC decided not to file that motion for specific monetary remedies because the matter was closed 8, yet a July 8, 2026 report still describes the three settlements as subject to court approval 1316. No fact gives an approved disgorgement or penalty figure for any of the three defendants, and the Pham bar duration is described as not yet determined 91517, so a side-by-side comparison of remedies cannot be completed. The newest fact is dated July 8, 2026, about three months before the current date of October 2026 1315.

Checked 2026-10-22. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] documented
Armand and Hernandez consented to bifurcated settlements that include permanent injunctions and officer-and-director bars, but the specific amounts for disgorgement and penalties are to be determined by the court.
"Armand and Hernandez consented to bifurcated settlements, subject to court approval, permanently enjoining them from violating the charged provisions of the federal securities laws, subjecting them to conduct-based injunctions, and barring them from acting as officers or directors. The court will determine the amount of disgorgement and prejudgment interest and any civil penalties."
Russell Armand, Maxwell Hernandez, Manpreet Singh Kohli, and ... - SEC.gov
[2] documented
The SEC's complaint seeks permanent injunctions, conduct-based injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus pre-judgment interest, civil penalties, and officer-and-director bars against all four defendants.
"The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, conduct-based injunctions, disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains plus pre-judgment interest, civil penalties, and officer-and-director bars against all the defendants."
Russell Armand, Maxwell Hernandez, Manpreet Singh Kohli, and ... - SEC.gov
[3] documented
The defendants allegedly hired market makers ZM Quant Investment Ltd. and Gotbit Consulting LLC to provide market-manipulation-as-a-service, including generating artificial trading volume.
"The defendants also allegedly engaged in market manipulation themselves and hired so-called market makers ZM Quant Investment Ltd. and Gotbit Consulting LLC to provide market-manipulation-as-a-service, which included generating artificial trading volume or manipulating the price of the Saitama Inu and SaitaRealty crypto assets"
Russell Armand, Maxwell Hernandez, Manpreet Singh Kohli, and ... - SEC.gov
[4] documented
The SEC filed the complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on October 9, 2024.
"Securities and Exchange Commission v. Russell Armand, Maxwell Hernandez, Manpreet Singh Kohli, and Nam Tran , No. 1:24-cv-12586-AK (D. Mass. filed Oct. 9, 2024)"
Russell Armand, Maxwell Hernandez, Manpreet Singh Kohli, and ... - SEC.gov
[5] documented
The court entered a judgment against Vy Pham on March 25, 2025, which required the payment of disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest.
"On March 25, 2025, the Court entered a Judgment as to Defendant Vy Pham. ... The Judgment, which was filed with the consent of both parties, explicitly provided that the Defendant shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest, and a potential civil penalty of an amount that shall be determined by the Court upon motion of the Commission."
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
[6] documented
The judgment included a provision for a potential civil penalty, but the specific amount was left to be determined by the court upon a future motion by the Commission.
"The Judgment, which was filed with the consent of both parties, explicitly provided that the Defendant shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest, and a potential civil penalty of an amount that shall be determined by the Court upon motion of the Commission."
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
[7] documented
Vy Pham pleaded guilty in a parallel criminal case on June 5, 2024, and was released on supervised release.
"On June 5, 2024, Defendant Pham pled guilty in a parallel criminal action before this Court, U.S. v. Pham, 24-cr-10137, and was released on supervised release."
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
[8] documented
The SEC decided not to file a motion to determine the specific monetary remedies, including the civil penalty, because the matter was closed.
"Under the facts and circumstances of this particular matter, Counsel for the Commission no longer intends to return to the Court to make a motion for determination of monetary remedies. As there are no longer any open issues related to the Judgment entered on March 25, 2025 and the matter was closed on that date, there is no further action necessary by the Court."
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
[9] documented
The SEC complaint against Vy Pham seeks disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, civil penalties, and an officer-and-director bar, but the specific amounts and duration are not yet determined.
"The complaint seeks a permanent injunction, conduct-based injunction, disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains plus pre-judgment interest, civil penalties, and an officer-and-director bar. Pham consented to a bifurcated settlement, subject to court approval, permanently enjoining her from violating the charged provisions of the federal securities laws, subjecting her to a conduct-based injunctio"
SEC.gov
[10] documented
Vy Pham is alleged to have manipulated the market for the crypto asset 'Saitama Inu' through coordinated purchases with other promoters.
"According to the SEC’s complaint, crypto asset promoter Pham personally engaged in market manipulation of the Saitama Inu crypto asset through coordinated purchases with other promoters designed to lure in new investors by creating the illusion of growing market interest in Saitama Inu."
SEC.gov
[11] documented
For the 'Robo Inu' crypto asset, Pham allegedly hired Gotbit Consulting LLC to provide market-manipulation-as-a-service, including generating artificial trading volume.
"For the Robo Inu crypto asset, Pham allegedly.hired so-called market maker Gotbit Consulting LLC to provide market-manipulation-as-a-service, which included generating artificial trading volume or manipulating the price of the Robo Inu crypto asset that was offered and sold as securities to retail investors in unregistered transactions."
SEC.gov
[12] documented
The United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts announced a parallel criminal action against Pham.
"The SEC appreciates the assistance of the FBI and the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts, which has announced a parallel criminal action."
SEC.gov
[13] supported
The SEC said Armand, Hernandez, and Pham agreed to settlements, but those settlements were subject to court approval.
"The SEC said that Armand, Hernandez, and Pham have agreed to settlements, subject to court approval."
SEC Charges Three Market Makers and Nine Individuals in Alleged Crypto ...
[14] supported
Armand, Hernandez, and Pham agreed to settlements without admitting or denying the SEC's claims.
"Three promoters, Armand, Hernandez, and Pham, have agreed to settlements without admitting or rejecting the claims."
Three Crypto Firms Named in U.S. Market Manipulation Probe
[15] supported
The expected settlements for Armand, Hernandez, and Pham are reported to include monetary penalties and bars on serving in executive positions, but no specific amounts or durations are given.
"Those settlements are expected to include penalties as well as bars on serving in executive positions ."
SEC Charges Three Market Makers and Nine Individuals in Alleged Crypto ...
[16] supported
The article states the settlement terms were not yet final in a judicial sense because court approval was still required.
"Court approval remains a necessary step, so the terms are not yet fully finalized in a judicial sense."
SEC Charges Three Market Makers and Nine Individuals in Alleged Crypto ...
[17] supported
The amount of money the promoters must pay had not been set in the reported settlements; the court was to decide it.
"The court will decide how much money the promoters will have to pay."
Three Crypto Firms Named in U.S. Market Manipulation Probe
[18] supported
The SEC is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement, civil penalties, and officer-and-director bars against certain defendants.
"As part of its enforcement push, the SEC is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains, civil penalties, and officer-and-director bars for certain defendants ."
SEC Charges Three Market Makers and Nine Individuals in Alleged Crypto ...
[19] supported
The SEC sought permanent injunctions, return of ill-gotten earnings with prejudgment interest, civil fines, and bans on serving as officers or directors against the defendants.
"They ask for permanent injunctions, the return of ill-gotten earnings with prejudgment interest, civil fines, and bans on serving as officers or directors."
Three Crypto Firms Named in U.S. Market Manipulation Probe
[20] supported
The SEC named Russell Armand, Maxwell Hernandez, Manpreet Singh Kohli, Nam Tran, and Vy Pham as having hired ZM Quant and Gotbit to manipulate trading volumes.
"According to the SEC, Russell Armand, Maxwell Hernandez, Manpreet Singh Kohli, Nam Tran, and Vy Pham hired ZM Quant and Gotbit to manipulate trading volumes."
SEC Charges Three Market Makers and Nine Individuals in Alleged Crypto ...