ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

How do crypto thieves steal coins, and are the thefts getting bigger by 2026?

Research question: How do rug pulls and wallet drainer kits work, from removing liquidity and abusing admin keys to using honeypot contracts and phishing, and how do investigators trace the stolen funds, and how has the scale of these losses changed by 2026?

Wallet drainers work by tricking a user into authorizing a malicious transaction or signature rather than by stealing login credentials 10, and Drainer-as-a-Service splits the work between operators who build the toolkits and affiliates who deploy the phishing sites 3. Rug pulls take several forms: in a liquidity-withdrawal rug pull, fraudsters redeem the LP tokens from the initial liquidity injection after the pool grows, which collapses the price 7, while in a freeze-authority rug pull the fraudster can freeze a victim's token account so the victim cannot sell 6. The records do not describe honeypot contracts or how investigators trace stolen funds; the closest fact is that operators distribute profits among themselves and their affiliates 5. Drainer losses peaked at about $494 million across more than 332,000 wallets in 2024 and fell to roughly $83.85 million across 106,106 wallets in 2025 9, and the newest fact is dated August 2, 2026 10, about two months before October 2026.

Checked 2026-10-22. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] documented
Wallet drainer phishing works by luring users to phishing websites where they sign transactions that let scammers withdraw their tokens.
"Specifically, users are tempted to visit phishing websites and sign phishing transactions that allow scammers to withdraw their tokens."
Unmasking the Shadow Economy: A Deep Dive into Drainer-as-a-Service Phishing on Ethereum (2025)
[2] supported
Victims of TxPhish are lured by promises of high profits into visiting fake websites and signing transactions that let scammers take their crypto assets.
"Specifically, tempted by high profits, users are tricked into visiting fake websites and signing transactions that enable scammers to steal their crypto assets."
TxPhishScope: Towards Detecting and Understanding Transaction-based Phishing on Ethereum (2023)
[3] documented
Drainer-as-a-Service splits the work: operators build the wallet drainer toolkits, while affiliates deploy and promote the phishing websites.
"In this model, drainer operators focus on crafting specialized phishing toolkits, named ''wallet drainers'', while drainer affiliates handle the deployment and promotion of phishing websites."
Unmasking the Shadow Economy: A Deep Dive into Drainer-as-a-Service Phishing on Ethereum (2025)
[4] supported
In the year before the paper, there were 11 large-scale TxPhish incidents on Ethereum with total losses of more than 70 million.
"The past year has witnessed 11 large-scale TxPhish incidents causing a total loss of more than 70 million."
TxPhishScope: Towards Detecting and Understanding Transaction-based Phishing on Ethereum (2023)
[5] supported
After stolen tokens are collected from victims, the DaaS operators distribute the profits among themselves and their affiliates through profit-sharing arrangements.
"After stealing victims' tokens, they will distribute profits."
Unmasking the Shadow Economy: A Deep Dive into Drainer-as-a-Service Phishing on Ethereum (2025)
[6] supported
In a freeze-authority rug pull, the fraudster can freeze a victim's token account after the victim buys the project token, so the victim cannot sell, while accounts the fraudster controls remain free to sell.
"the FreezeAccount instruction to freeze the token account"
From Hype to Collapse: Investigating Rug Pull Scams on Solana
[7] supported
In liquidity-withdrawal rug pulls, fraudsters keep the LP tokens from the initial liquidity injection, and after marketing draws in capital and the pool grows, they redeem those LP tokens, which rapidly depletes the pool and collapses the price.
"Since fraudsters usually hold a significant proportion of the"
From Hype to Collapse: Investigating Rug Pull Scams on Solana
[8] supported
A rug pull is a fraud in which developers hide backdoor code in smart contracts so they can steal user funds under certain conditions.
"Rug-pull, a typical form of fraud, involves developers hiding backdoor codes in smart contracts to steal funds under certain conditions, causing significant damage to users."
Detecting Rug-Pull: Analyzing Smart Contract Backdoor Codes in Ethereum (2025)
[9] supported
Wallet-drainer phishing losses peaked at about $494 million across more than 332,000 wallets in 2024, then fell to roughly $83.85 million across 106,106 wallets in 2025.
"Wallet-drainer phishing losses rose to $494 million across more than 332,000 affected wallets in 2024, then fell to approximately $83.85 million across 106,106 affected wallets in 2025."
Crypto Wallet Drainer Statistics 2026: Losses & Victims
[10] supported
A wallet drainer works by tricking a user into authorizing a malicious transaction or signature rather than by stealing login credentials.
"A wallet drainer is a phishing tool that tricks a user into authorizing a malicious transaction or signature."
Crypto Wallet Drainer Statistics 2026: Losses & Victims
[11] supported
Scam Sniffer estimated that wallet drainers stole close to $494 million in 2024 alone from more than 332,000 addresses, and more than $800 million since 2023.
"estimated wallet drainers stole close to $494 million in 2024 alone from more than 332,000 addresses, and more than $800 million since 2023"
Crypto Phishing Campaigns in 2026: Inside the Drainer Economy
[12] supported
Drainer-as-a-Service lowered the barrier for affiliates by supplying prebuilt scripts, phishing templates, hosting, dashboards, and operational support, so they could run campaigns without writing draining code.
"Drainer-as-a-Service lowered the technical barrier for affiliates by providing prebuilt scripts, phishing templates, hosting, dashboards, and operational support."
Crypto Wallet Drainer Statistics 2026: Losses & Victims
[13] supported
Pink Drainer retired in May 2024 after being linked to more than $85 million stolen from over 21,000 victims.
"Pink Drainer retired in May 2024 after being linked to more than $85 million in theft from over 21,000 victims."
Crypto Wallet Drainer Statistics 2026: Losses & Victims
[14] supported
On Solana, the existence of mint and freeze authorities acts as a kill switch for the deployer, allowing them to pause transfers or blacklist wallets.
"On Solana, the equivalents are the mint and freeze authorities, whose mere existence hands the deployer a kill switch."
Rug Pull Forensics in 2026: What the Chain Can and Cannot See
[15] supported
A wallet drainer is a toolkit that converts a wallet connection handshake into an immediate theft of the victim's tokens.
"A wallet drainer is the turnkey toolkit that turns a wallet -connect handshake into an immediate sweep of the victim's tokens"
Wallet Drainers Explained: How Drainer Kits Work, the Inferno / Angel ...
[16] supported
A single Permit2 signature on a malicious front end can authorize an unbounded allowance that the drainer later sweeps.
"a single Permit2 signature on a malicious front end can authorise an unbounded allowance the drainer sweeps later"
Wallet Drainers Explained: How Drainer Kits Work, the Inferno / Angel ...
[17] documented
Some smart contracts can be controlled by admin keys or super users who can change protocol parameters or, in certain cases, access assets held within the protocol.
"Furthermore, some smart contracts can be controlled by "admin keys" or "super users" with special privileges. These users can make changes to protocol parameters or, in certain cases, access assets held within a protocol."
20-F Bullish (BLSH) (CIK 0001872195) 2026-03-10
[18] documented
Smart contracts can be controlled by admin keys or super users who can unilaterally change the contract, enable or disable features, and alter how it transmits digital assets.
"These users may have the ability to unilaterally make changes to the smart contract, enable or disable features on the smart contract, change how the smart contract receives external inputs and data or transmits Digital Assets, and make other changes to the smart contract."
424B3 Franklin Crypto Trust (EZPZ) (CIK 0002033807) 2025-12-01
[19] supported
The same Ethereum and BSC research found that the liquidity withdrawals collectively generated $240 million in profits.
"Theyfoundthattheliquiditywithdrawalscollectivelyhave generated$240millioninprofits."
SolRPDS: A Dataset for Analyzing Rug Pulls in Solana Decentralized Finance
[20] supported
If an attacker gains access to admin privileges or a super user acts maliciously, customers may suffer a total loss of their assets' value.
"If an attacker gains access to these privileges or a super user acts maliciously, customers may experience a total loss of their assets' value."
20-F Bullish (BLSH) (CIK 0001872195) 2026-03-10
[21] supported
Rug pulls are described as exit scams in which developers or influencers who promote a smart contract or application ultimately escape with investors' money at an agreed time.
"There may be opportunities for bad actors to perpetrate fraudulent schemes and engage in illicit activities and other misconduct, such as exit scams and rug pulls (orchestrated by developers and/or influencers who promote a smart contract or application and, ultimately, escape with the money at an agreed time), or Ponzi or similar fraud schemes."
424B3 Franklin Crypto Trust (EZPZ) (CIK 0002033807) 2025-12-01
[22] supported
In the basic rug pull, the operator, after adding the liquidity pool and waiting for buyers, removes all liquidity from the pool, leaving investors holding tokens with no market.
"Lastly,Everemovesalltheliquidityfromtheliquidity"
Token Spammers, Rug Pulls, and SniperBots: An Analysis of the Ecosystem of Tokens in Ethereum and in the Binance Smart Chain (BNB)
[23] supported
Rug pulls work by exploiting liquidity pools that users supply on decentralized exchanges, draining token value from the pool.
"todraintokenvaluefromtheliquiditypool"
SolRPDS: A Dataset for Analyzing Rug Pulls in Solana Decentralized Finance
[24] supported
Governance tokens can be concentrated among a small group of core community members, who could make changes to a smart contract unilaterally even when it uses decentralized governance.
"such governance tokens can be concentrated in the hands of a small group of core community members, who would be able to make similar changes unilaterally to the smart contract."
20-F Bullish (BLSH) (CIK 0001872195) 2026-03-10
[25] supported
Attackers siphoned over $3.8 billion in digital assets from smart contracts, including bridges and DeFi protocols, in 2022.
"Other smart contracts, such as bridges between blockchain networks and DeFi protocols have also been manipulated, exploited or used in ways that were not intended or envisioned by their creators such that attackers syphoned over $3.8 billion worth of digital assets from smart contracts in 2022."
424B3 Franklin Crypto Trust (EZPZ) (CIK 0002033807) 2025-12-01
[26] supported
Token creators can allow free token creation and retain large portions of the token supply, which increases the risk of a rug pull.
"enabledeveloperstoretainlarge"
SolRPDS: A Dataset for Analyzing Rug Pulls in Solana Decentralized Finance
[27] supported
A vulnerability in a Parity multi-signature wallet smart contract led to a reportedly $30 million theft of ether in July 2017, and a later Parity bug froze roughly $160 million of ether.
"in July 2017, a vulnerability in a smart contract for a multi-signature wallet software developed by Parity led to a reportedly $30 million theft of ether, and in November 2017, a new vulnerability in Parity’s wallet software reportedly led to roughly $160 million worth of ether being indefinitely frozen in an account."
424B3 Franklin Crypto Trust (EZPZ) (CIK 0002033807) 2025-12-01
[28] supported
A design flaw in the MakerDAO smart contract in March 2020 forced liquidations of depositors' crypto assets at significantly discounted prices, causing millions of dollars in losses.
"in March 2020, a design flaw in the MakerDAO smart contract caused forced liquidations of crypto assets at significantly discounted prices, resulting in millions of dollars of losses to users who had deposited crypto assets into the smart contract."
424B3 Franklin Crypto Trust (EZPZ) (CIK 0002033807) 2025-12-01