ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: thin

After removing fake trades, does volume still predict price moves, and how much?

Research question: Do the volume-return interaction results in [2] replicate in samples that use wash-trade-filtered volume, and how much of the predictive power remains after filtering?

The records do not show whether the volume-return interaction results in 2 replicate in wash-trade-filtered samples, because 2 reports only that a Columbia University analysis found roughly 25% of Polymarket's historical volume showed signs of wash trading and does not address return predictability. The closest related evidence is that lagged cryptocurrency returns positively predict wash trade volume 3, but that paper does not test replication of 2 or report predictive power after filtering 3. Filtering does affect performance in related work, as the standard LAMV portfolio's Sharpe Ratio falls from 1.41 without wash-trading treatment to 0.96 with it 1. Treatment removes essentially all small-volume wash trades but only some large-volume ones 7, so the share of predictive power that remains cannot be determined from these facts. The newest fact is dated April 2, 2026 2, about six months before October 2026.

Checked 2026-10-21. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] documented
The standard LAMV portfolio with wash trading treatment has a lower Sharpe Ratio (0.96) than the portfolio without treatment (1.41).
"We notice that the standard LAMV portfolio with treatment on wash trading (Portfolio 8) has a lower SR (0.96) than that from the standard TMV Portfolio 7 (SR=1.35) and the standard LAMV Portfolio 9 without treatment on wash trading (SR=1.41)."
Liquidity Jump, Liquidity Diffusion, and Treatment on Wash Trading of Crypto Assets
[2] supported
A Columbia University analysis found that roughly 25% of Polymarket's historical volume showed signs of wash trading, which indicates how much reported volume filtering could remove, though the article does not address return predictability.
"A Columbia University analysis of Polymarket found roughly 25% of historical volume showed signs of wash trading"
Crypto’s wash trading problem is ‘far more common’ than investors think, DOJ sting shows
[3] supported
In the paper's panel regression, lagged cryptocurrency returns positively predict wash trade volume, which is the closest the document comes to a volume-return relationship, though it does not test replication of reference [2] or report predictive power after filtering.
"In Table 10, lagged cryptocurrency returns positively predict wash trade volume, while lagged volatility shows a strong negative prediction."
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES CRYPTO WASH TRADING Lin William Cong Xi Li Ke Tang
[4] supported
Wash trading is positively predicted by past returns and negatively predicted by price volatility.
"Moreover, wash trading is positively predicted by returns and negatively by price volatility."
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES CRYPTO WASH TRADING Lin William Cong Xi Li Ke Tang
[5] supported
The authors attribute the return effect to exchanges wanting to pump volume to attract retail investors and improve their ranking, and they attribute the volatility effect to lower wash-trading risk in calmer markets.
"Price increases could draw retail investors’ attention and encourage speculation. Therefore, crypto exchanges are incentivized to pump up volumes to vie for better ranking and more clients."
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES CRYPTO WASH TRADING Lin William Cong Xi Li Ke Tang
[6] supported
Treatment on wash trading significantly reduces liquidity diffusion but only marginally reduces liquidity jump, leaving jump at a level inadequate to restore the asset's responsiveness to the autoregressive models.
"We demonstrate that treatment of washing trading significantly reduces the liquidity diffusion, but only reduces the liquidity jump to a level that is inadequate to restore the asset’s responsiveness to the autoregressive models."
Liquidity Jump, Liquidity Diffusion, and Treatment on Wash Trading of Crypto Assets (2024)
[7] supported
Wash-trade treatment removes essentially all small-volume wash trades but only some large-volume wash trades.
"Our results indicate that treatment on wash trading essentially removes all small-volume wash trades, but only some large-volume wash trades."
Liquidity Jump, Liquidity Diffusion, and Treatment on Wash Trading of Crypto Assets (2024)
[8] supported
The authors argue that treatment on wash trading is unnecessary when modeling established crypto assets on unregulated but mainstream exchanges.
"We argue that treatment on wash trading is unnecessary in modeling established crypto assets that trade in unregulated but mainstream exchanges."
Liquidity Jump, Liquidity Diffusion, and Treatment on Wash Trading of Crypto Assets (2024)