ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

Can traders who hear about coin listings early get rich, and is that illegal?

Research question: How do exchange listing announcements and listing fees create information advantages for traders who buy before the news is public, and how do current insider-trading theories and enforcement actions apply to these exchange and token events?

The records show that insider trading in crypto markets often involves privileged knowledge of upcoming announcements such as new listings 8, and Bitcoin volatility rises significantly ahead of major regulatory announcements, which suggests pre-announcement trading 9. Under EU law, the MiCAR insider trading prohibition covers crypto-assets admitted to trading or with a pending admission request, on and off trading platforms 1, and it reaches any person profiting from information asymmetry rather than only classical insiders 2. US law instead rests on the misappropriation theory adopted in O'Hagan 6, and the Second Circuit's theory in Chiarella would have made a trader's regular access to market information a basis for a special relationship with everyone the trader dealt with 11. Robinhood's policy bars insiders from trading a crypto-asset from its listing announcement until 24 hours afterward 13, and it treats stablecoin listings as material only if the peg is at risk 16. The verified facts do not address listing fees or how they create information advantages, and the newest fact is from December 2025, about ten months before October 2026 13.

Checked 2026-10-22. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] documented
Under EU law (MiCAR), the insider trading prohibition applies to crypto-assets that have been admitted to trading or for which a request for admission has been made, covering transactions both on and off trading platforms.
"MiCAR insider law captures behavior concerning crypto-assets which have been admitted to trading or for which a request to trade has been made, Art. 86 para. 1 MiCAR. The relevant transactions or behavior are covered on a trading platform as well as outside a platform, Art. 86 para. 2, both in the EU and in third countries, para. 3."
Insider Trading in European Law – from financial instruments to crypto-assets (2024)
[2] supported
The EU approach to insider trading is broader than US law because it is based on market integrity and investor protection, allowing it to capture any person profiting from information asymmetry, rather than limiting liability to classical insiders or those who misappropriated information.
"Arguably, the policy focus on market integrity and investor protection allows to capture insider trading on crypto markets more comprehensively if compared to the USA policies underlying classical insider or misappropriation theories."
Insider Trading in European Law – from financial instruments to crypto-assets (2024)
[3] supported
In crypto markets, informational advantages often stem from the opaque nature of digital assets, issuers, exchanges, and intermediaries, rather than from traditional fiduciary duties or misappropriation of corporate secrets.
"Rather, informational advantages will often go back to the opaque nature of many digital assets, issuers, exchanges, and intermediary market actors as well as the services they offer."
Insider Trading in European Law – from financial instruments to crypto-assets (2024)
[4] supported
EU law conceptualizes insider trading primarily as a mechanism to maintain efficient markets by requiring the immediate disclosure of material information, whereas US law relies on theories of classical insiders and misappropriation.
"EU law, by contrast, conceptualizes insider trading law primarily as a contribution to efficient markets. Its trading prohibition goes hand in hand with an obligation to immediately disclose material information to the market."
Insider Trading in European Law – from financial instruments to crypto-assets (2024)
[5] documented
MiCAR distinguishes between crypto-assets admitted to trading (subject to MiCAR insider law) and digital investment tokens that qualify as financial instruments under MiFID II (subject to MAR insider law).
"With MiCAR, EU law features two distinct groups of digital assets to which insider law applies: firstly, crypto-assets admitted to trading. They qualify under MiCAR’s insider trading prohibition. Secondly, digital investment tokens which qualify as a financial instrument under MiFID II. These fall under MAR’s insider law."
Insider Trading in European Law – from financial instruments to crypto-assets (2024)
[6] documented
The Supreme Court's decision in O'Hagan adopted the misappropriation theory, which forms the basis of the current insider trading prohibition.
"the adoption of the main doctrine that forms the basis of the insider trading prohibition today – the doctrine of the “misappropriation theory” – had a meaningful deterrent effect. This paper examines this question by studying the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in O’Hagan, which adopted the misappropriation theory"
The Impact of Insider Trading Doctrine on the Incidence of Insider Trading: An Analysis of the Effect of the Misappropriation Theory (2023)
[7] supported
Because pending transactions are visible to the public before they are executed, a malicious user can see a victim's incoming transaction, submit a new one, and pay to have it placed ahead of the victim's.
"because pending transactions are public, a malicious user can observe a victim’s incoming transaction, craft a new transaction and then pay to place it before that of the victim."
Commitment Against Front Running Attacks
[8] supported
Insider trading in cryptocurrency markets involves using confidential information about a cryptocurrency to manipulate the market, often through privileged knowledge of upcoming announcements such as new listings.
"It happens when individuals use confidential information about a cryptocurrency to manipulate the market. This often involves using privileged knowledge of upcoming announcements, such as new cryptocurrency listings or major news that could significantly impact the market (EconOne, 2024)."
THE IMPACT OF ANNOUNCEMENTS ON CRYPTOCURRENCY PRICES (2024)
[9] supported
Bitcoin's volatility rises significantly ahead of regulatory announcements, especially those covered by major outlets like the Financial Times, which suggests pre-announcement trading activity.
"They find that Bitcoin's volatility increases significantly ahead of regulatory announcements, especially those covered by major outlets like the Financial Times."
THE IMPACT OF ANNOUNCEMENTS ON CRYPTOCURRENCY PRICES (2024)
[10] supported
Chiarella, a financial printer who was not an insider of the target companies, was convicted for trading on confidential information from his job about impending tender offers, buying cheap and selling dear.
"Vincent Chiarella used confidential information obtained through his job in a financial printing house to anticipate impending tender offers. He bought cheap and, soon after, sold dear."
Chiarella v. United States, 445 U.S. 222 (1980) (No. 78-1202) (1980)
[11] supported
The Second Circuit's theory would have made a trader's regular access to market information, regardless of source, a basis for a special relationship with everyone the trader dealt with.
"a trader's regular access to market information, irrespective of source, places him in a special relationship with all buyers and sellers with whom he deals"
Chiarella v. United States, 445 U.S. 222 (1980) (No. 78-1202) (1980)
[12] supported
Around 70% of pump announcements in the dataset occur between 15:00 and 17:00 UTC, showing that the timing of these events is highly concentrated.
"around 70% of pump announcements occur between 15:00 and 17:00 UTC"
PumpSense: Real-Time Detection and Target Extraction of Crypto Pump-and-Dumps on Telegram
[13] documented
Robinhood's policy bars insiders from trading a crypto-asset from the moment Robinhood publicly announces its new listing or delisting until 24 hours after that broad public announcement.
"They are restricted from trading of a crypto-asset(s) on Robinhood or another platform, from the time Robinhood publicly announces a new listing or delisting of such crypto-asset(s) up to twenty-four (24) hours after such broad public announcement."
10-K Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) (CIK 0001783879) 2026-02-18
[14] documented
Employees identified as 'Coin Aware Individuals' face stricter rules because they are exposed to material non-public information during the crypto listing and delisting process.
"those who have been identified as Coin Aware Individuals (as defined below) are subject to even more restrictive requirements due to their exposure to MNPI during the listing/delisting process."
10-K Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) (CIK 0001783879) 2026-02-18
[15] documented
The policy treats a crypto-asset's information as becoming public only after a 24-hour waiting period, compared with one full regular trading session for securities, before insiders may trade.
"You should refrain from trading until the market has had an opportunity to absorb and evaluate the information, which this Policy defines as one full regular trading session (in the case of securities) and 24 hours (in the case of crypto-assets) after the information was broadly disseminated."
10-K Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) (CIK 0001783879) 2026-02-18
[16] supported
Listings and delistings of a stablecoin are generally not material as long as its pegged price is not in doubt, but become material if the peg is at risk.
"So long as a stablecoin’s pegged price is not in doubt, listings and delistings of the stablecoin are unlikely to be material with respect to the stablecoin"
10-K Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) (CIK 0001783879) 2026-02-18