ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

Did ancient Egypt, Persia, and India also have a one-God idea?

Research question: What evidence exists for a shared 'one God' idea across traditions outside the Abrahamic family (Zoroastrianism, Egyptian Atenism, Hindu Brahman)?

The records show that Ahura Mazda is presented as the supreme figure in Zoroastrianism, praised above all other spiritual beings 1, and is described as eternal, uncreated, and the creator of everything 2. However, the sources also say Zoroastrianism has its own particular form of monotheism rather than being simply monotheistic or polytheistic 4, and the Dēnkard School's bifoundationalism holds two sources of reality while worshipping only one, which does not match the one-source monotheist idea 78. For Hinduism, the records show that Advaita Vedanta holds the individual soul (Atman) to be the same as the highest metaphysical reality, a nondualist idea that comes closest to a single-ultimate-reality concept 5, but no fact links this directly to Brahman as a god. No verified fact [1-9] addresses Egyptian Atenism, so that tradition remains unaddressed. The newest fact dates from 2023 9, about three years before October 2026.

Checked 2026-10-19. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
Ahura Mazda is presented as the supreme figure in Zoroastrianism, with the Gathas praising him above all other spiritual beings.
"The Gathas are dedicated wholly to him, for they praise him above all other spiritual beings."
Ahura Mazda (2012)
[2] supported
Ahura Mazda is described as eternal, uncreated, and the creator of everything.
"He is eternal and uncreated, the creator of everything and the maintainer of cosmic harmony."
Ahura Mazda (2012)
[3] supported
Ahura Mazda is first attested in the Gathas of Zarathushtra, which are described as the oldest Iranian texts in existence.
"Ahura Mazda (“the Wise Lord”) is first attested in the Gathas of Zarathushtra, the oldest Iranian texts in existence."
Ahura Mazda (2012)
[4] supported
The source argues that Zoroastrianism has its own particular form of monotheism, rather than being simply monotheistic or polytheistic.
"it is argued that Zoroastrianism has its own particular form of monotheism."
Monotheism the Zoroastrian Way (2013)
[5] supported
Advaita Vedanta, a Hindu school, holds that the individual soul (Atman) is the same as the highest metaphysical reality, a monist or nondualist idea that is the closest the document comes to a single-ultimate-reality concept.
"Its central idea is that Atman (soul) is same as the highest metaphysical reality"
Advaita Vedanta (2017)
[6] supported
The source proposes a correlation between agriculturally marginal landscapes and the development of monotheism, but it is a hypothesis under examination rather than an established finding.
"The argument which is taken up in this writing is the correlation between agriculturally marginal landscape and the development of monotheism."
Mobile People, Mobile God: Mobile Societies, Monotheism, and the Effects of Ecological Landscapes on the Development of Ancient Religions (2016)
[7] supported
The Zoroastrian Dēnkard School's dualism is described as instructively different from monotheism: it holds two sources of reality but worships only one, so it does not share the single-source monotheist idea.
"Bifoundationalism is instructively different from monotheism."
Zoroastrian Philosophy in the Islamic World (2023)
[8] supported
In Zoroastrian bifoundationalism there are two sources of reality, with only the Light considered 'god', which contrasts with the one-source, one-worship structure of monotheism.
"Bifoundationalism is slightly different: there are two sources of reality, but only one ought to be worshipped; these two sources are encapsulated as Light and Dark, and only the Light is considered ‘god’ (Pahl. yazd < Av. yazata-, lit. ‘worthy of worship’)."
Zoroastrian Philosophy in the Islamic World (2023)
[9] supported
The Dēnkard School polemicized against contemporary monotheists (Muslims, Christians, and Jews), arguing that their beliefs neglected the contrary source, which is the Dark.
"This contrast is important, since the Dēnkard School polemicized against contemporary monotheists (i.e., Muslims, Christians, and Jews), arguing that their beliefs neglected the contrary source."
Zoroastrian Philosophy in the Islamic World (2023)