ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: strong

Where did Samaritans come from, and how do their beliefs differ from Jewish ones?

Research question: How do Samaritan and Jewish texts describe the origins and religious practices of the Samaritans, and where do the Samaritan Pentateuch and other Samaritan writings diverge from the Jewish tradition?

The records show that the Samaritan Pentateuch differs from the Jewish Masoretic text in roughly 6,000 places regarding wording, spelling, and interpretation 319. Samaritan texts identify Mount Gerizim as the divinely chosen location for the sanctuary, whereas the Jewish Torah refers to a place God will choose 516. In terms of practice, Samaritans maintain a hereditary priestly structure and continue animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim, rejecting the rabbinic Oral Torah and Talmud that govern Jewish tradition 171820. Additionally, Samaritan historiography minimizes the Israelite exile of the 8th century B.C. while emphasizing the Babylonian Exile, and their calendar begins counting from the entry into the Promised Land rather than creation 913.

Checked 2026-10-14. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
The Samaritan version of the Pentateuch developed from earlier versions transmitted in Paleo-Hebrew and square script, or was transmitted in its early stages in both scripts.
"The paleographic conclusion that arises from the evidence presented is that the Samaritan version developed from earlier versions that were transmitted in Paleo-Hebrew and in square script, or that the Samaritan version was transmitted in its early stages in both of these scripts."
The Relationship between Paleography and Textual Criticism: Textual Variants Due to Graphic Similarity between the Masoretic Text and the Samaritan Pentateuch as a Test Case (2018)
[2] documented
The Samaritan Pentateuch reached us in the Samaritan script, which itself developed from the Paleo-Hebrew script.
"The SP itself reached us in a still later script, the Samaritan script, which developed from the Paleo-Hebrew script."
The Relationship between Paleography and Textual Criticism: Textual Variants Due to Graphic Similarity between the Masoretic Text and the Samaritan Pentateuch as a Test Case (2018)
[3] supported
The Samaritan Pentateuch differs from the Masoretic Jewish Pentateuch in roughly 6,000 places, while one estimate counts about 1,900 points of agreement with the Greek Septuagint.
"There are some 6,000 differences between the Samaritan Pentateuch and the Masoretic Jewish Pentateuch text; and, according to one estimate, 1,900 points of agreement between it and the Greek LXX version"
Samaritanism
[4] supported
The Abisha Scroll, a Pentateuch manuscript, is attributed to Abishua, a grandson of Aaron, and is traditionally said to have been compiled in the Bronze Age.
"a manuscript of the Pentateuch tradition attributed to Abishua , grandson of Aaron , traditionally compiled during the Bronze Age."
Samaritanism
[5] supported
The Samaritan Pentateuch calls Mount Gerizim 'the place that God has chosen' for His Temple, whereas the Jewish Torah says 'the place that God will choose'.
"in other passages of the Samaritan Pentateuch it is also mentioned without ambiguity that Mount Gerizim is "the place that God has chosen" for His Temple"
Samaritanism
[6] supported
From the Samaritan perspective, Jewish rabbis turned the introductory statement of the Ten Commandments into a commandment, and removed the tenth, to keep the name 'Ten Commandments'.
"the Jewish rabbis made the presentation into a commandment to maintain the name "Ten Commandments""
Samaritanism
[7] supported
Samaritans build their Sukkot booth indoors, a practice that a Samaritan historian traces to persecution under the Byzantine Empire.
"Samaritan historian Benyamim Tsedaka traces the indoor-sukkah tradition to persecution of Samaritans during the Byzantine Empire ."
Samaritanism
[8] supported
Samaritan texts blame the figure of Eli for causing the schism between Samaritans and Jews and for ending the period of Divine Grace.
"Like the Samaritan Book of Joshua it blames Eli not only for the schism between Samaritans (who see themselves as the true Israel) and the Jews, but also for bringing the period of Divine Grace and Favor to an end and causing Divine Disfavor which has existed till today."
Samaritan documents : relating to their history, religion, and life (1977)
[9] supported
Samaritan historiography minimizes the Israelite exile of the 8th century B.C. while emphasizing the Babylonian Exile of the Jews.
"The Samaritan Chronicles are naturally coy about the exile of the Israelites towards the last quarter of the eighth century B.C. With them much prominence is given to the Babylonian Exile of the Jews."
Samaritan documents : relating to their history, religion, and life (1977)
[10] supported
The Samaritan Book of Joshua is not part of their official Canon of Scripture but has been highly valued since the later Middle Ages.
"True the Samaritan Book of Joshua too is not part of their Canon of Scripture, but they at least since the later Middle Ages have all set considerable store by it; before that it seems to have been recognised only by sectarians within the Samaritan fold."
Samaritan documents : relating to their history, religion, and life (1977)
[11] supported
Jewish sources from the 8th or 9th century A.D. describe the Samaritan Law as written in shorthand (Notarikon), which the Samaritans refute by claiming to possess the full text.
"Already in the Pirke de-Rabbi ’Eli’ezer, (8th or 9th century A.D.), reference is made (ch. XXXVIII) to the Samaritan Law being written in Notarikon - i.e. shorthand - an obvious but rather hostile reference to the ketafim; the Samaritans, after all, have the full text of the Law as well."
Samaritan documents : relating to their history, religion, and life (1977)
[12] supported
Samaritan marriage documents do not reflect later Jewish legal modifications that were not established until the 1st century B.C. or later.
"The Samaritan Marriage Document in its provisions however does not seem aware of later Jewish modifications not earlier than the 1st century B.C."
Samaritan documents : relating to their history, religion, and life (1977)
[13] supported
The Samaritan calendar starts its count from the year the people entered the Promised Land with Joshua, whereas the Jewish calendar starts from the first year of creation.
"Whereas the Jewish calendar is calculated from the first year of creation, the Samaritan calendar starts from the year the people entered the Promised Land with Joshua bin-Nun."
Calendar - Israelite Samaritan Information Institute
[14] supported
The Samaritan calendar traditionally relied on direct observation of the moon's birth on Mount Gerizim, a practice that was replaced by a computer algorithm in the 20th century.
"Traditionally, the Samaritan calendar was calculated from observations of the birth of the moon, made on Mount Gerizim. In the 20th century the late High Priest Avraham b. Pinchas transferred the responsibility for the calculation to a computer algorithm"
Calendar - Israelite Samaritan Information Institute
[15] supported
Samaritan religious practice dictates that the day begins and ends with sunset.
"For Samaritans the day begins and ends with sunset."
Calendar - Israelite Samaritan Information Institute
[16] supported
Samaritans recognize Mount Gerizim, rather than Jerusalem, as the divinely chosen location for Israel's sanctuary.
"The central distinction: Samaritanism shares the Torah and many ancient Israelite traditions with Judaism, but it recognizes Mount Gerizim—not Jerusalem—as the chosen place for Israel’s sanctuary."
Samaritanism: beliefs, history, and modern practice
[17] supported
Samaritan religious authority does not include the rabbinic Oral Torah, Mishnah, or Talmud, which are governing authorities in Judaism.
"Religious authority: Samaritanism does not follow the rabbinic Oral Torah, Mishnah, Talmud, or later Jewish legal tradition as its governing authority."
Samaritanism: beliefs, history, and modern practice
[18] supported
Samaritans continue the practice of animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim during Passover, a ritual not performed in contemporary Jewish worship.
"Passover: Samaritans continue an animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim, a practice not carried out in contemporary Jewish worship."
Samaritanism: beliefs, history, and modern practice
[19] supported
The Samaritan Pentateuch differs from the Masoretic Hebrew text used in Jewish tradition in wording, spelling, arrangement, and interpretation.
"Textual tradition: The Samaritan Pentateuch differs from the Masoretic Hebrew text used in Jewish tradition."
Samaritanism: beliefs, history, and modern practice
[20] supported
Samaritan religious leadership maintains a hereditary priestly structure with a high priest, distinct from Jewish communal leadership.
"Priesthood: Samaritan religious leadership retains a prominent hereditary priestly structure and a high priest."
Samaritanism: beliefs, history, and modern practice