ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

Would astronauts need to be germ-free for Mars, and who could go?

Research question: Would astronauts have to be sterilized or cleaned before a crewed Mars landing, and how would that rule affect who is allowed to go?

The records do not establish that astronauts would have to be sterilized before a crewed Mars landing. The current NASA directive does not explicitly detail sterilization protocols for astronauts 2, and the crewed-mission paper recommends detailed screening of crew and spacecraft surfaces rather than sterilization 14. Crews also cannot be fully sterile, since each human body carries about 3.8 × 10^13 microbial cells 16. COSPAR reported that knowledge gaps must be closed before an implementable policy can be written for the first crewed Mars mission, so no such policy exists yet 13. A proposed Mars policy update would let missions show contamination probability does not exceed 1 × 10⁻⁴ per mission 9, but none of the sources say who would be excluded from a mission under such a rule 20. The newest fact in this set is dated October 1, 2026 7, so the picture reflects current status.

Checked 2026-10-18. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] documented
NASA previously had a specific directive (NID 8715.129) dedicated to biological planetary protection for human missions to Mars, which has since been cancelled.
"Minor administrative change made to remove the reference to NID 8715.129, Biological Planetary Protection for Human Mission to Mars, that was cancelled by the responsible office."
N PR 8715 0024
[2] documented
The current NASA directive NPR 8715.24 defines procedural requirements for planetary protection informed by COSPAR guidelines, but does not explicitly detail sterilization protocols for astronauts in the provided text.
"This directive defines NASA roles and responsibilities and the procedural requirements, informed by Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) Planetary Pro... guided by the COSPAR policy and guidelines, as amended August 2020 (see for Appendix D additional information), as an accepted approach for demonstrating compliance with the Outer Space Treaty."
N PR 8715 0024
[3] documented
Missions to the Moon and beyond are assigned a planetary protection categorization for the outbound phase, while missions returning samples are assigned categorizations for both outbound and return phases.
"All missions to the Moon and beyond are assigned a categorization for the outbound phase. Missions returning samples to the Earth-Moon system are assigned a categorization for the return phase in addition to the outbound planetary protection mission category."
N PR 8715 0024
[4] documented
The Planetary Protection Officer (PPO) is responsible for reviewing and concurring on preliminary planetary protection mission categorization requests.
"Reviews for concurrence the proposer's or project's preliminary planetary protection mission categorization request."
N PR 8715 0024
[5] documented
The Outer Space Treaty, specifically Article IX, is a foundational reference for NASA's planetary protection requirements.
"Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (the "Outer Space Treaty"), October 19, 1967, Article IX."
N PR 8715 0024
[6] supported
The discipline of Planetary Protection is grounded in the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, specifically Article IX, which focuses on controlling the risk of harmful contamination during exploration.
"The PP discipline is grounded in the Outer Space Treaty (OST) of 1967... Article IX of the OST focuses on controlling the risk of harmful contamination during exploration and research of outer space and avoiding adverse effects to the Earth from the introduction of extraterrestrial matter from other solar system bodies."
NASA Planetary Protection Handbook - Astrobiology
[7] supported
The interpretation of 'harmful contamination' is not explicitly defined in the Outer Space Treaty and evolves as exploration technology and scientific knowledge advance.
"It should be noted that the OST does not explicitly define “harmful contamination.” The interpretation of “harmful contamination” changes as exploration technology evolves and scientific studies provide more knowledge."
NASA Planetary Protection Handbook - Astrobiology
[8] supported
NASA's Planetary Protection policy is informed by COSPAR guidelines but provides detailed requirements for implementation to demonstrate compliance with the Outer Space Treaty.
"For this reason, NASA’s PP policy and technical standard are informed by COSPAR policy, but additionally provide the detailed requirements for PP implementation by NASA missions and NASA-partnered missions to demonstrate compliance with the OST."
NASA Planetary Protection Handbook - Astrobiology
[9] supported
The proposed Mars planetary protection policy update introduces a Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) framework that allows missions to demonstrate contamination probability does not exceed 1 × 10⁻⁴ per mission.
"The proposed update would introduce a Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) framework alongside the existing prescriptive approach. Under the probabilistic pathway, missions would use mission-specific modelling of contamination pathways and controls to demonstrate that the probability of a contamination event does not exceed 1 × 10⁻⁴ per mission during the 50-year Period of Biological Exploration (P"
COSPAR Panel On Planetary Protection Endorses Proposed Update To The Mars Planetary Protection Policy - Astrobiology
[10] supported
The new policy aims to protect Mars and preserve the integrity of life-detection science by providing a risk-based pathway for future missions.
"This represents an important evolution in planetary protection for future Mars missions, providing a risk-based pathway while maintaining the fundamental objective of protecting Mars and preserving the integrity of life-detection science."
COSPAR Panel On Planetary Protection Endorses Proposed Update To The Mars Planetary Protection Policy - Astrobiology
[11] supported
NASA established a Planetary Protection Independent Review Board (PPIRB) in response to a National Academies report and a NASA Advisory Council recommendation.
"In 2019 NASA’s Planetary Protection Review Addresses Changing Reality of Space Exploration – a report Friday with recommendations from the Planetary Protection Independent Review Board (PPIRB) the agency established in response to a recent National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report and a recommendation from the NASA Advisory Council."
Possible News From The Committee on Astrobiology and Planetary Sciences Meeting - Astrobiology
[12] supported
NASA is evaluating whether a precursor mission is necessary before crewed Mars landings.
"Determine if a precursor mission is necessary"
sma.nasa.gov National Aeronautics and Space Administration www.nasa.gov
[13] supported
The COSPAR meeting series identified knowledge gaps that must be closed before an implementable planetary protection policy can be written for the first crewed Mars mission, so no such policy exists yet.
"This meeting series first identified a prioritized list of knowledge gaps that, if addressed, would permit development of an implementable planetary protection policy for the initial crewed Mars mission."
Final Report of the COSPAR Meeting Series on Knowledge Gaps in Planetary Protection for Crewed Missions to Mars (2023)
[14] supported
The document recommends that all crew and surfaces of the spacecraft be screened in detail before lift-off from Earth and again before landing back on Earth, for example by whole metagenome sequencing (WMS). It does not describe sterilization.
"Before lift-off from Earth and before landing back on Earth, all surfaces and crew of the spacecraft should be screened in as much detail as possible, for example, by WMS."
The crewed journey to Mars and its implications for the human microbiome (2022)
[15] supported
One of the three main topics the COSPAR meeting series studied was technologies and operations for contamination control of spacecraft systems, alongside microbial and human health monitoring.
"The three main topic threads considered within the meeting series were: microbial and human health monitoring; natural transport of terrestrial biological contamination on Mars, and; technologies and operations for contamination control (of spacecraft systems)."
Final Report of the COSPAR Meeting Series on Knowledge Gaps in Planetary Protection for Crewed Missions to Mars (2023)
[16] supported
Each human body carries about 3.8 × 10^13 microbial cells, so every crewed mission will carry many microorganisms with the crew, which suggests crews cannot be fully sterile.
"Each human body is accompanied by 3.8 × 10 13 microbial cells [ 4 ] and thus every crewed mission will include numerous microorganisms introduced by the humans’ “microbial cloud” [ 5 ]."
Preparing for the crewed Mars journey: microbiota dynamics in the confined Mars500 habitat during simulated Mars flight and landing (2017)
[17] supported
One stated goal of planetary protection on return from Mars is protecting the terrestrial ecosystem from possible Martian life.
"(i) protection of the terrestrial ecosystem from possible Martian life;"
The crewed journey to Mars and its implications for the human microbiome (2022)
[18] supported
Planetary protection protocols adopt an exclusionary principle for Special Regions, meaning areas where terrestrial organisms could propagate or where martian life might exist, to prevent forward contamination.
"Planetary protection protocols (National Research Council, 2002 , 2006 ; COSPAR, 2005 ) have been established in order to mitigate forward contamination of other planetary bodies, with an exclusionary principle adopted for Special Regions."
Microbial Ecology of a Crewed Rover Traverse in the Arctic: Low Microbial Dispersal and Implications for Planetary Protection on Human Mars Missions (2015)
[19] supported
Protecting the crew from illness and infection caused by harmful biological contaminants is named as one of the major challenges for a crewed Mars mission.
"Besides numerous technical issues, one of the major challenges is the protection of the human crew from illness and infection caused by harmful biological contaminants."
Preparing for the crewed Mars journey: microbiota dynamics in the confined Mars500 habitat during simulated Mars flight and landing (2017)
[20] supported
If unknown or exotic signals appear in sequencing data, the authors say strict quarantine should be imposed until planetary protection is ensured. The document does not say who would be excluded from a mission.
"In that case, strict quarantine should be imposed until planetary protection is ensured."
The crewed journey to Mars and its implications for the human microbiome (2022)
[21] supported
A Special Region on Mars is defined as a region where terrestrial organisms are likely to propagate, or where there is a high potential for extant martian life.
"A Special Region on Mars is defined as “a region within which terrestrial organisms are likely to propagate, or a region which is interpreted to have a high potential for the existence of extant martian life forms”"
Microbial Ecology of a Crewed Rover Traverse in the Arctic: Low Microbial Dispersal and Implications for Planetary Protection on Human Mars Missions (2015)
[22] supported
Serious infections during space travel have so far been mostly superficial skin infections, with 29 infectious disease incidents (urinary tract and subcutaneous skin) reported among 742 astronauts.
"To date, serious infections during space travel have been limited to mostly superficial skin infections [ 21 ]. Among 742 astronauts, 29 infectious disease incidents in the urinary tract and subcutaneous skin infections were reported [ 21 ]."
Preparing for the crewed Mars journey: microbiota dynamics in the confined Mars500 habitat during simulated Mars flight and landing (2017)
[23] supported
The study found that a crewed rover crossing undisturbed terrain may not significantly contaminate the surroundings through airborne release of microbes from the vehicle.
"Results support the conclusion that a crewed rover traveling over previously undisturbed terrain may not significantly contaminate the local terrain via airborne dispersal of propagules from the vehicle."
Microbial Ecology of a Crewed Rover Traverse in the Arctic: Low Microbial Dispersal and Implications for Planetary Protection on Human Mars Missions (2015)
[24] supported
Spaceflight stress and extreme conditions weaken the immune system and increase susceptibility to infection in humans.
"When humans are exposed to stress and extreme environmental conditions, as they would experience during a spaceflight, the immune system is negatively affected, and susceptibility to infection is increased [ 114 , 115 ]."
Preparing for the crewed Mars journey: microbiota dynamics in the confined Mars500 habitat during simulated Mars flight and landing (2017)