ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

Which faster engines are scientists building for Mars, and how close are they?

Research question: Which propulsion technologies are being developed to shorten a Mars trip, and how far along are they?

The records show that nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) is the option most studied to cut travel time and spacecraft mass for crewed missions beyond cislunar space 1. Its readiness is still limited, since low technology readiness of a complex system is named as the main obstacle 4, and the RD-0410 reactor was never run for its full planned duration 2. Nuclear electric propulsion is described as an evolutionary path built on SP-100 reactor technology, with trip times projected to be comparable to NTP 1411. Gas-core and other advanced concepts remain early-stage, with a 1970 gas-core power unit reaching only preliminary design and only computational modeling done on the advanced concepts 1031. The newest facts are from 2026, the current year, and they describe NTP as promising but not yet operational 15, while the records contain no 2026 status update on laser-thermal or nuclear electric systems 38.

Checked 2026-10-20. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
Nuclear thermal propulsion is being studied as a way to reduce travel time and spacecraft mass for human missions beyond cislunar space.
"Nuclear thermal propulsion can potentially reduce the time of flight and spacecraft system mass needed for human spaceflight beyond cislunar space."
Combined Cycle Nuclear System Architecture for Crewed Mars Spacecraft Propulsion and Power (2024)
[2] supported
The RD-0410 nuclear rocket engine's reactor went through a significant series of tests but was never run for its full planned duration.
"Реактор прошёл значительную серию испытаний, но ни разу не испытывался на полную длительность работы."
РД-0410
[3] supported
A Mars mission is aiming to use nuclear propulsion, and it is on a tight deadline.
"Mars mission aims for nuclear propulsion—on a tight deadline (2026)"
Mars mission aims for nuclear propulsion—on a tight deadline (2026)
[4] supported
Nuclear thermal propulsion's benefits have been held back by low technology readiness of a complex system, which is the main obstacle to its use.
"the canonical problem for nuclear propulsion has always been that its benefits are shadowed by low technology readiness of a complex system."
Combined Cycle Nuclear System Architecture for Crewed Mars Spacecraft Propulsion and Power (2024)
[5] supported
The engine's out-of-reactor components were fully tested and worked out.
"Внереакторные узлы были отработаны полностью."
РД-0410
[6] supported
The proposed combined cycle nuclear thermal rocket uses a 42-MWt reactor core to deliver 9.4 kN of thrust at a specific impulse of 940 s.
"comprises a 42-MWt-capable nuclear reactor core to provide 9.4 kN thrust on demand at a specific impulse of 940 s."
Combined Cycle Nuclear System Architecture for Crewed Mars Spacecraft Propulsion and Power (2024)
[7] supported
The first power startup of the first RD-0410 reactor on 27 March 1978 reached up to 25 MW, about 1/7 of the design power, with hydrogen up to 1500 °C and a run time of 70 seconds.
"27 марта 1978 года — первый энергетический пуск первого реактора ЯРД 11Б91. Мощность: до 25 МВт (примерно 1/7 от проектной) , температура водорода — до 1500 градусов Цельсия , время работы — 70 секунд."
РД-0410
[8] documented
The study finds Earth-to-Mars transfers under 100 days appear feasible with about 680,000 kg of liquid hydrogen propellant and a dry mass of 83,000 kg, including a 13,000 kg propulsion system.
"Earth-to-Mars orbital transfers less than 100 days appear feasible assuming 680,000 kg of liquid hydrogen propellant and a vehicle dry mass of 83,000 kg that includes the 13,000 kg CCNTR system."
Combined Cycle Nuclear System Architecture for Crewed Mars Spacecraft Propulsion and Power (2024)
[9] supported
The reactor would also supply up to 100 kWe of spacecraft power, removing the need for solar power and avoiding the difficulty of restarting a cold reactor for burns.
"The reactor also produces up to 100 kWe power for the spacecraft, eliminating the need for solar power generation and averting challenges associated with restarting a cold reactor for propulsive burns."
Combined Cycle Nuclear System Architecture for Crewed Mars Spacecraft Propulsion and Power (2024)
[10] supported
In 1970 a gas-core nuclear power unit (ЭУ-610, 3.3 GW) reached only the preliminary design stage.
"эскизный проект космической энергоустановки с ГФЯР ЭУ-610 мощностью 3,3 ГВт"
РД-0410
[11] supported
The split-sprint nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) system is projected to offer trip times comparable to nuclear thermal propulsion systems.
"The split-sprint nuclear electric propulsion system offers trip times comparable to nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) systems, while providing mission abort opportunities that are not possible with "reference" mission architectures."
Nuclear Electric Propulsion: A “Better, Safer, Cheaper” Transportation System for Human Exploration of Mars (1994)
[12] supported
Current Mars mission approaches rely only on chemical rockets, which is why the thesis studies hybrid architectures.
"while current approaches use only chemical rockets, it is important to study how a hybrid architecture affects performance."
Assessing General Propulsion Architectures for Fast Transit Times to Mars for Crewed Missions (2025)
[13] supported
Chemical propulsion is limited for deep space because of its low specific impulse and long transfer times, which constrain payload capacity and mission flexibility.
"Conventional chemical propulsion systems have limitations for deep space exploration due to their limited specific impulse and extended transfer durations, which constrain payload capacity and mission flexibility."
Study of Nuclear Thermal Propulsion for Interplanetary Missions: Case Study of Mars (2026)
[14] supported
The NEP development plan is evolutionary, building on the SP-100 space nuclear reactor technology that was already developed for lunar and Mars surface power.
"The NEP development project plan proposed includes evolutionary technology development for nuclear electric propulsion systems that expands upon SP-100 (Space Power - 100 kw e) technology that has been developed for lunar and Mars surface nuclear power"
Nuclear Electric Propulsion: A “Better, Safer, Cheaper” Transportation System for Human Exploration of Mars (1994)
[15] supported
Ongoing research suggests NTP could play a significant role in safer and more efficient interplanetary exploration within the coming decades, so it is not yet an operational technology.
"However, ongoing research suggests that NTP could play a significant role in enabling safer and more efficient interplanetary exploration within the coming decades."
Study of Nuclear Thermal Propulsion for Interplanetary Missions: Case Study of Mars (2026)
[16] supported
The modeled NTP engine has a specific impulse of 900 s, compared with 455 s for chemical propulsion.
"chemical Isp = 455 s, NTP Isp = 900 s"
A System-Level Chemical, Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Allocation Framework for Crewed Earth -Mars Transportation  <div> Analytical Break-Even Conditions, Reconciled ΔV, and a Scoped Research Program </div> (2026)
[17] supported
Future upgrades of the NEP system are expected to further reduce trip times and improve payload capability, safety, and reliability.
"System upgrades are expected to evolve that will result in even shorter trip times, improved payload capabilities, and enhanced safety and reliability."
Nuclear Electric Propulsion: A “Better, Safer, Cheaper” Transportation System for Human Exploration of Mars (1994)
[18] supported
The current timeline for a crewed trip to Mars usually involves a one-way trip of 6 to 9 months.
"it usually involves a 6-9 month one way trip."
Assessing General Propulsion Architectures for Fast Transit Times to Mars for Crewed Missions (2025)
[19] supported
Reducing transit time to Mars is expected to reduce many of the hazards of crewed interplanetary travel.
"Most of the effects of these hazards can be reduced by reducing the transit time to Mars."
Assessing General Propulsion Architectures for Fast Transit Times to Mars for Crewed Missions (2025)
[20] supported
Non-nuclear technology development for the NEP system was estimated to cost about $721 million in 1993 dollars, with nuclear reactor development costs excluded because they fall under the nuclear surface power program.
"Non-nuclear technology development for the NEP system is estimated to cost about $721 M (1993 $)."
Nuclear Electric Propulsion: A “Better, Safer, Cheaper” Transportation System for Human Exploration of Mars (1994)
[21] documented
Unlike chemical rockets, the nuclear thermal rocket gets its energy from fission of Uranium-235 atoms in the fuel elements of its reactor core, not from combustion.
"Unlike conventional chemical rockets that produce their energy through combustion, the NTR derives its energy from fission of Uranium-235 atoms contained within fuel elements that comprise the engine s reactor core."
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) 20120003776: Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP): A Proven Growth Technology for Human NEO/Mars Exploration Missions (2012)
[22] supported
Nuclear thermal propulsion was started in 1955 as project Rover under the Atomic Energy Commission and assigned to Los Alamos National Laboratory.
"and was assigned to Los Alamos National Laboratory."
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) 20140008771: Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Ground Test History (2014)
[23] supported
The Phoebus 2A reactor ran for 12 minutes at 4100 MW, showing that sufficient power was available.
"Phoebus 2A ran for 12 minutes at 4100 MW demonstrating sufficient power is available."
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) 20140008771: Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Ground Test History (2014)
[24] supported
The study examines nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) as the propulsion option for a piloted Mars mission with a short transit time, based on a split/sprint opposition scenario from Stafford Committee recommendations.
"The requirements of nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) are examined with respect to a specific mission scenario derived from Stafford Committee recommendations."
Performance impact on nuclear thermal propulsion of piloted Mars missions with short transit times (1991)
[25] supported
Most of the Space Exploration Initiative's propulsion effort went toward a solid-core nuclear thermal rocket and a high-power nuclear electric propulsion system.
"Most of the effort was directed toward developing a solid-core, nuclear thermal rocket and examining a high-power nuclear electric propulsion system."
Advanced nuclear thermal propulsion concepts (1993)
[26] supported
The NTP engine requirements call for a thrust level of 50-75 klb, a maximum single burn time of 0.6 hours, and a maximum total-mission burn time of 1.7 hours.
"The engine requirements call for a 50-75-klb engine-thrust level, maximum single burn time of 0.6 hours, and a maximum total-mission burn time of 1.7 hours."
Performance impact on nuclear thermal propulsion of piloted Mars missions with short transit times (1991)
[27] documented
An Innovative Concepts committee recommended further work on higher-performance but less mature concepts: gas core fission rockets, inertial confinement fusion systems, antimatter rockets, and gas core fission electric systems.
"The committee considered several concepts and eventually recommended that further work be performed in the areas of gas core fission rockets, inertial confinement fusion systems, antimatter based rockets, and gas core fission electric systems."
Advanced nuclear thermal propulsion concepts (1993)
[28] supported
Nuclear thermal rocket technology is described as proven and could cut one-way Mars transit times by as much as 50 percent by increasing the propellant capacity of the Mars transfer vehicle.
"Proven nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) technology, with its high thrust and high specific impulse (Isp ~900 s), can cut 1-way transit times by as much as 50 percent by increasing the propellant capacity of the Mars transfer vehicle (MTV)."
Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP): A Proven, Growth Technology for 'Fast Transit' Human Missions to Mars (2013)
[29] supported
The nuclear thermal rocket Mars transportation system is presented as support for the human Mars mission of the Space Exploration Initiative.
"This paper presents stage performance and requirements for a nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) Mars transportation system to support the human Mars mission of the SEI."
Mars mission opportunity and transit time sensitivity for a nuclear thermal rocket propulsion application (1993)
[30] supported
For a crew of six, a total mission of 475 days with a 90-day stay at Mars is judged possible under this NTP scenario.
"For a crew of 6, a 475-day total-mission trip with a 90-day stay at Mars is possible."
Performance impact on nuclear thermal propulsion of piloted Mars missions with short transit times (1991)
[31] supported
Only some computational modeling has been done at Los Alamos on these advanced concepts, and critical issues were identified, so they remain at an early stage.
"Following the committee's recommendations, some computational modeling work has been performed at Los Alamos in certain of these areas and critical issues have been identified."
Advanced nuclear thermal propulsion concepts (1993)
[32] supported
The smallest engine tested during the Rover program, the 25 klbf 'Pewee,' is said to be sufficient for short-transit missions when clustered in groups of three to four, so no large engine scale-up is needed.
"No large technology scale-ups in engine size are required for these short transit missions either since the smallest engine tested during the Rover program—the 25 klbf “Pewee” engine is sufficient when used in a clustered arrangement of three to four engines."
Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP): A Proven, Growth Technology for 'Fast Transit' Human Missions to Mars (2013)
[33] supported
The opposition-class mission has relatively short Mars stays of 30 to 90 days and a total duration of 350 to 600 days, while the conjunction-class mission has much longer stays and total durations of 875 to 1,000 days.
"The opposition class mission is associated with relatively short Mars stay times ranging from 30 to 90 days and total mission duration of 350 to 600 days."
Mars mission opportunity and transit time sensitivity for a nuclear thermal rocket propulsion application (1993)
[34] supported
The analysis considers propulsion-technology assumptions as a key factor in the mission performance of the NTP scenario.
"other mission-performance issues considered include propulsion-technology assumptions, triple-perigee earth-departure burns, and Mars parking-orbit selection"
Performance impact on nuclear thermal propulsion of piloted Mars missions with short transit times (1991)
[35] supported
The Space Exploration Initiative, which aimed to put people on Mars, was effectively terminated in 1992, before its technologies could be substantially developed.
"Although the initiative did not exist long enough to allow substantial technology development"
Advanced nuclear thermal propulsion concepts (1993)
[36] supported
The baseline crewed 'Copernicus' NTR vehicle can achieve one-way transit times of roughly 150 to 220 days depending on the launch opportunity, with 150-day transits possible for the 2033 mission.
"The baseline Copernicus design is capable of 1-way transit times ranging from ~150 to 220 days depending on the particular opportunity. For the 2033 mission, 150-day transit times are possible."
Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP): A Proven, Growth Technology for 'Fast Transit' Human Missions to Mars (2013)
[37] documented
Halving transit times to 90 days with NTP is considered challenging but possible, though it raises the mission delta-V budget by about 250 percent to roughly 15.175 km/s.
"Cutting the transit times in half to 90-days increases the Mars stay time to ~673 days, but decreases the round trip time to ~853 days. The mission V budget however, increases by ~250 percent to ~15.175 km/s! While challenging, transit times this short are possible using NTP."
Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP): A Proven, Growth Technology for 'Fast Transit' Human Missions to Mars (2013)
[38] supported
The laser-heated hydrogen propellant is exhausted through a nozzle to reach a specific impulse of 3000 s.
"The hydrogen propellant is then exhausted through a nozzle to realize specific impulses of 3000 s."
Design of a rapid transit to Mars mission using laser-thermal propulsion (2021)