ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

As of October 2026, can anything reliably send messages back? What do experts say?

Research question: As of October 2026, is there any method that reliably delivers a message to a moment before it was sent, and what do experts say about it?

The records show no method that has been established to reliably deliver a message to a moment before it was sent, and precognition is not shown to exist 2926. Mainstream science generally does not accept parapsychology as a scientific discipline and treats it as pseudoscience 23, and critics attribute apparently successful psi results to imprecise procedures and methodological errors 31. Retrocausal quantum research is only theoretical and has been demonstrated only in computer simulations 2122, and physicist Kater Murch, who was not involved, says building such systems would require perfect measurements that are not possible 24. The newest fact is dated February 19, 2026, about eight months before October 2026, so the record does not cover later developments, and the facts do not address every possible method.

Checked 2026-10-21. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
Theoretical constructs like Gödel's rotating universe and traversable wormholes only allow closed timelike curves under unphysical assumptions such as infinite mass or negative energy.
"Proposed constructs such as Gödel's rotating universe, the Tipler cylinder, traversable wormholes, and the inner regions of Kerr black holes all theoretically allow CTCs-but only under unphysical assumptions such as infinite mass, negative energy, or cosmological rotation."
Infinity Algebra and the Rejection of Closed Timelike Curves: Disproofs of Incomplete Frameworks in Relativity (2026)
[2] supported
Bell believed that retrocausality would conflict with free will and fundamental scientific assumptions, describing it as a cure worse than the disease.
"Bell felt that the cure would be worse than the disease – he thought that this kind of “retrocausality” would conflict with free will, and with assumptions fundamental to the practice of science. (He said that when he tried to think about retrocausality, he “lapsed into fatalism”)."
Completing the physical representation of quantum algorithms provides a retrocausal explanation of their speedup
[3] supported
Stephen Hawking proposed the chronology protection conjecture, a hypothesis that laws of physics beyond standard general relativity prevent time travel.
"The chronology protection conjecture is a hypothesis first proposed by Stephen Hawking that laws of physics beyond those of standard general relativity prevent time travel ⁠ ‍ —   even when the latter theory states that it should be possible (such as in scenarios where faster than light travel is allowed)."
Chronology protection conjecture
[4] supported
Semiclassical gravity calculations suggest that quantum vacuum fluctuations would build up and drive energy density to infinity at the moment a traversable wormhole first allows for closed timelike curves, potentially destroying the wormhole.
"Initial attempts to apply semiclassical gravity to the traversable wormhole time machine indicated that at exactly the moment that wormhole would first allow for closed timelike curves, quantum vacuum fluctuations build up and drive the energy density to infinity in the region of the wormholes."
Chronology protection conjecture
[5] supported
A general proof found in 1997 demonstrated that according to semiclassical gravity, the energy of the quantum field must be infinite or undefined on the horizon of a time machine.
"However, in 1997 a general proof was found demonstrating that according to semiclassical gravity, the energy of the quantum field (more precisely, the expectation value of the quantum stress-energy tensor) must always be either infinite or undefined on the horizon itself."
Chronology protection conjecture
[6] supported
Stephen Hawking conjectured that quantum-gravitational effects would prevent the formation of any type of time machine, not just wormholes.
"Stephen Hawking conjectured that not only would the pileup of vacuum fluctuations still succeed in destroying the wormhole in quantum gravity, but also that the laws of physics would ultimately prevent any type of time machine from forming; this is the chronology protection conjecture."
Chronology protection conjecture
[7] supported
A definite theoretical decision on the status of the chronology protection conjecture requires a full theory of quantum gravity, as semiclassical methods are considered unreliable at the necessary scales.
"A definite theoretical decision on the status of the chronology protection conjecture would require a full theory of quantum gravity [ 13 ] as opposed to semiclassical methods."
Chronology protection conjecture
[8] supported
Semiclassical approaches suggest that Stephen Hawking's chronology protection conjecture fails to prevent the formation of Roman rings.
"Semiclassical approaches to incorporating quantum effects into general relativity seem to show that the chronology protection conjecture postulated by physicist Stephen Hawking fails to prevent the formation of such rings"
Roman ring
[9] supported
Matt Visser believes the semiclassical approach is unreliable and that a full theory of quantum gravity will likely uphold chronology protection.
"Matt Visser feels that there are reasons to think the semiclassical approach is unreliable here, and that a full theory of quantum gravity will likely uphold chronology protection."
Roman ring
[10] supported
The Roman ring concept was proposed by Matt Visser in 1997.
"a Roman ring (proposed by Matt Visser in 1997 [ 1 ] and named after the Roman arch , a concept proposed by Mike Morris and Kip Thorne in 1988 and named after physicist Tom Roman ) [ 2 ] is a configuration of wormholes"
Roman ring
[11] supported
The chronology protection conjecture suggests that quantum effects would intervene to eliminate spacetimes allowing backward time travel, potentially making the Alcubierre drive invalid.
"Some physicists have presented arguments to suggest that a theory of quantum gravity (which would incorporate both theories) would eliminate those solutions in general relativity that allow for backward time travel (see: Chronology protection conjecture ) and thus make the Alcubierre drive invalid."
Alcubierre drive
[12] supported
Alcubierre warned that any method to travel faster than light can in principle be used to travel back in time, but noted that the chronology protection conjecture implies something will go wrong if one tries to build a time machine.
"beware: in relativity, any method to travel faster than light can in principle be used to travel back in time (a time machine)". In the next slide, he brings up the chronology protection conjecture and writes: "The conjecture has not been proven (it wouldn't be a conjecture if it had), but there are good arguments in its favor based on quantum field theory. The conjecture does not prohibit faster-"
Alcubierre drive
[13] supported
A 2025 theoretical model by Achintya Sajeendran and Timothy Ralph modified a rotating Alcubierre construction to create spatially circular geodesics that a freely falling particle could enter and leave from flat spacetime, though it is not considered physically realizable.
"a 2025 follow-up by Achintya Sajeendran and Ralph modified the rotation profile so that some of these curves become spatially circular geodesics, which a freely falling particle could enter and leave from an ordinary flat region of spacetime; the authors present the construction as a theoretical model rather than a physically realisable one."
Alcubierre drive
[14] supported
Calculations by physicist Allen Everett show that warp bubbles could be used to create closed timelike curves, which general relativity predicts could be used for backwards time travel.
"Calculations by physicist Allen Everett show that warp bubbles could be used to create closed timelike curves in general relativity, meaning that the theory predicts that they could be used for backwards time travel ."
Alcubierre drive
[15] supported
A 2022 study by Barceló et al. found that in 2+1 and higher dimensions, the locations of infinite blueshift are generically isolated points, meaning total energy accumulation need not diverge, which weakens the claim that semiclassical instability rules out warp bubbles.
"A 2022 study by Carlos Barceló, Valentin Boyanov, Luis Garay, Eduardo Martín-Martínez and Jose Manuel Sánchez Velázquez re-examined this argument and found that in 2+1 and higher dimensions the locations at which infinite blueshift occurs are generically isolated points, so that the total energy accumulated need not diverge; the authors suggested that suitable choices of bubble shape and trajector"
Alcubierre drive
[16] supported
Psychiatrist Dr. Karl Menninger's associate, Dr. Robert Knight, said that mind-reading demonstrations in which the performer passes no messages are nothing but clever deceptions.
"are nothing but clever deceptions."
Image 54 of Detroit evening times (Detroit, Mich), August 6, 1944, (FINAL, THE AMERICAN WEEKLY)
[17] supported
Levin tested mathematically the commonsensical idea that efficient real-time prediction of an unpredictable future sentiment is impossible, and affirmed it.
"an efficient real-time prediction of an unpredictable future sentiment is impossible and affirmed it"
A Look for a Presentiment Model’s Reasonable Parameters (2026)
[18] supported
A 2020 study argues that if quantum theory holds for macroscopic 'observers', one of three conclusions must hold, one being superdeterminism, which the study describes as involving no retrocausality.
"ein Superdeterminismus (alles ist seit Anbeginn vorherbestimmt, keine Retrokausalität) zutrifft."
Wigners Freund
[19] supported
Levin suggested verbally that the presentiment effect (PSE) is merely a 'quantum delusion': it really appears, but only retrospectively.
"verbally suggesting that the PSE is merely a “quantum delusion.” That is, it really appears, yet retrospectively only."
A Look for a Presentiment Model’s Reasonable Parameters (2026)
[20] documented
A 1937 newspaper article reports that scientists did not go beyond saying ESP could probably exist in some people, with no firm proof of how it works.
"No scientist now goes beyond the conclusion that something of the nature of ESP prob probably - ably probably can exist in certain persons if not in everybody"
Image 96 of San Antonio light (San Antonio, Tex.), October 31, 1937, (LATE MORNING)
[21] supported
The reversed-arrow-of-time research is only theoretical so far, though it could be tested experimentally.
"The findings are currently theoretical but could be tested experimentally"
What if time were reversed? Physicists show how time could flow backward on a quantum scale
[22] supported
The reversal method was demonstrated only in computer simulations, where knowing the initial state and the measurement outcome let researchers reverse the arrow of time in a quantum system.
"Using computer simulations, García-Pintos and his colleagues found that by knowing the original state of a quantum system and the outcome after a measurement is made, they could reverse the arrow of time"
What if time were reversed? Physicists show how time could flow backward on a quantum scale
[23] supported
Mainstream science generally does not accept parapsychology as a scientific discipline and treats it as a pseudoscience.
"Die seriöse Wissenschaft erkennt die Parapsychologie als wissenschaftliche Disziplin gemeinhin nicht an und betrachtet sie als Pseudowissenschaft ."
Parapsychologie
[24] supported
Physicist Kater Murch, not involved in the study, says building such Hamiltonians in practice would require perfect measurements without information loss, which is not possible.
"Creating these Hamiltonians in practice would require perfect measurements without information loss, says Murch, who was not involved in the study."
What if time were reversed? Physicists show how time could flow backward on a quantum scale
[25] supported
The authors judge it unlikely that experimental research alone will succeed in the long run in demonstrating PSI effects.
"This makes it unlikely that experimental research alone will be successful in the long run demonstrating PSI effects."
Nailing Jelly: The Replication Problem Seems to Be Unsurmountable. Two Failed Replications of the Matrix Experiment (2022)
[26] supported
Parapsychology has not managed to conclusively prove that the phenomena it studies exist, despite using methods also used in psychology and medicine.
"Dennoch ist es der Parapsychologie bislang nicht gelungen, die Existenz der von ihr untersuchten Phänomene zweifelsfrei nachzuweisen, trotz des Einsatzes von auch in anderen Bereichen der Wissenschaft wie der Psychologie und der Medizin verwendeter Methoden."
Parapsychologie
[27] supported
Current measurement efficiency for collecting returning light from quantum systems is only about 50 percent, so some details are lost and researchers must improve measurement before real-system time reversal is possible.
"But the efficiency with which they collect that returning light to see how the system changes is only about 50 percent, he says, which means some details are fuzzy."
What if time were reversed? Physicists show how time could flow backward on a quantum scale
[28] supported
Two independent replications of the matrix experiment with 64 and 40 participants both failed to reach significance, and the authors concluded the paradigm is not replicable.
"None of the two experiments was significant."
Nailing Jelly: The Replication Problem Seems to Be Unsurmountable. Two Failed Replications of the Matrix Experiment (2022)
[29] supported
Precognition is defined as receiving information about future events before they occur, without it being extrapolated from past or present possibilities; this claimed ability is not shown to exist.
"Präkognition : Empfangen oder wahrnehmen von Informationen zukünftiger Ereignisse, bevor diese eintreten und ohne dass sie aus den Möglichkeiten der Vergangenheit oder Gegenwart extrapoliert werden können."
Parapsychologie
[30] supported
The authors state that precognition and related anomalous effects, collectively called psi, have a controversial scientific status.
"We discuss the controversial status of precognition and other anomalous effects collectively known as psi."
Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events [version 2; referees: 2 approved] (2016)
[31] supported
Critics argue that apparently successful results in psi research stem from imprecise experimental procedures, poorly trained researchers and methodological errors rather than genuine psi effects.
"Gutachter kritisieren, dass scheinbar erfolgreiche Versuchsergebnisse in der Psi-Forschung eher auf ungenauen Versuchsdurchführungen, schlecht ausgebildeten Forschern und methodischen Fehlern beruhen als auf echten Psi-Effekten."
Parapsychologie
[32] supported
The post-selection-based nonlocal correlations described in the paper cannot be used for teleportation, and they can only be verified on pairs of particles, not on each particle alone.
"Moreover, it cannot be verified on each particle alone (only on pairs) and cannot be used for teleportation."
Weak Values and Quantum Nonlocality
[33] supported
The apparent entanglement in this scenario is of a subtle kind, because the pre- and post-selected states were not entangled to begin with.
"However, this entanglement is of subtle kind since both the pre- and post-selected states were not entangled in the first place."
Weak Values and Quantum Nonlocality
[34] supported
The authors say quantum correlations underlie almost any experiment but become visible only upon post-selection and grouping of similar results.
"We thus understand that quantum correlations underlie almost any experiment, but are only visible upon post-selection and grouping of similar results."
Weak Values and Quantum Nonlocality