ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

Which scientists said loop messages wouldn't change history, and what did critics say?

Research question: Which physicists have argued that a loop-based message would still leave history unchanged, and what objections did they face?

Igor Novikov proposed the self-consistency principle, arguing that while causal loops allow influence on the past, they do not allow the alteration of history 13. Stephen Hawking's chronology protection conjecture similarly suggests that closed timelike curves would be destroyed before they could be used to send messages back in time 6. Seth Lloyd's post-selection model supports this view by rendering any paradoxical outcome to have zero probability, strictly forbidding actions that would lead to paradoxes 11. The provided records do not specify the particular objections these physicists faced regarding the argument that history remains unchanged.

Checked 2026-10-16. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
Stephen Hawking argued that building a finite time machine, such as a Tipler cylinder, is impossible under general relativity if the region satisfies the weak energy condition (i.e., contains no negative energy).
"An objection to the practicality of building a Tipler cylinder was discovered by Stephen Hawking , who argued that according to general relativity it is impossible to build a time machine in any finite region that satisfies the weak energy condition , meaning that the region contains no exotic matter with negative energy."
Tipler cylinder
[2] supported
Hawking stated that creating a finite time machine requires negative energy, contradicting the assumption of positive energy density.
"Hawking comments: "it can't be done with positive energy density everywhere! I can prove that to build a finite time machine, you need negative energy.""
Tipler cylinder
[3] supported
Hawking's argument for the impossibility of finite time machines with positive energy was published in his 1992 paper on the chronology protection conjecture.
"Hawking's argument appears in his 1992 paper on the chronology protection conjecture (though the argument is distinct from the conjecture itself, since the argument asserts that classical general relativity predicts a finite region containing closed timelike curves can only be created if there is a violation of the weak energy condition in that region, whereas the conjecture predicts that closed t"
Tipler cylinder
[4] supported
Hawking proved that if causality violations appear in a finite region of spacetime without curvature singularities, the averaged weak energy condition must be violated on the Cauchy horizon.
"In the paper, he examines "the case that the causality violations appear in a finite region of spacetime without curvature singularities" and proves that "[t]here will be a Cauchy horizon that is compactly generated and that in general contains one or more closed null geodesics which will be incomplete. One can define geometrical quantities that measure the Lorentz boost and area increase on going"
Tipler cylinder
[5] supported
Physicist John G. Cramer argued that proposed methods for retrocausal quantum communication are flawed and unable to transmit nonlocal signals, consistent with the no-communication theorem.
"Physicist John G. Cramer has explored various proposed methods for nonlocal or retrocausal quantum communication and found them all flawed and, consistent with the no-communication theorem , unable to transmit nonlocal signals."
Retrocausality
[6] supported
Stephen Hawking's chronology protection conjecture suggests that closed timelike curves (time loops) would be destroyed before they could be used to send messages back in time.
"However, the chronology protection conjecture of Stephen Hawking suggests that any such closed timelike curve would be destroyed before it could be used."
Retrocausality
[7] supported
Hypothetical tachyons cannot be used to send messages back in time because the Feinberg reinterpretation principle prevents ordinary matter from creating a tachyon detector capable of receiving information.
"Specifically, the Feinberg reinterpretation principle means that ordinary matter cannot be used to make a tachyon detector capable of receiving information."
Retrocausality
[8] supported
Even if retrocausal effects are possible, they may not be capable of producing outcomes different from those resulting from normal causal relationships.
"Even if such effects are possible, however, they may not be capable of producing effects different from those that would have resulted from normal causal relationships."
Retrocausality
[9] supported
The Stückelberg interpretation, proposed by Ernst Stueckelberg and later Richard Feynman, reinterprets the positron as an electron moving backward in time, which is required in modern quantum field theory.
"Ernst Stueckelberg , and later Richard Feynman , proposed an interpretation of the positron as an electron moving backward in time, reinterpreting the negative-energy solutions of the Dirac equation . This is called the Stückelberg interpretation ."
Retrocausality
[10] supported
Carlo Rovelli has argued that thermodynamics inhibits time travel to the past.
"In contrast, Carlo Rovelli has argued that thermodynamics inhibits time travel to the past."
Quantum mechanics of time travel
[11] supported
Seth Lloyd's post-selection model renders any paradoxical outcome to have zero probability, strictly forbidding actions that would lead to paradoxes.
"Lloyd's model is notable for its direct handling of potential paradoxes, such as the grandfather paradox, by rendering any paradoxical outcome to have zero probability. [ 23 ]"
Quantum mechanics of time travel
[12] supported
David Deutsch's model for closed timelike curves results in the time traveler existing in a superposition of states with certain probabilities, unlike Lloyd's model which forbids paradoxes.
"In Deutsch's model, the time traveler would find themselves in a superposition of states where they exist with a certain probability. In Lloyd's model, any action that would lead to a paradox is strictly forbidden by the post-selection."
Quantum mechanics of time travel
[13] supported
Igor Novikov proposed the self-consistency principle in the 1980s, stating that changes made by a time traveler must not create historical paradoxes.
"In the 1980s, Igor Novikov proposed the self-consistency principle . [ 5 ] According to this principle, any changes made by a time traveler in the past must not create historical paradoxes ."
Quantum mechanics of time travel
[14] documented
T.C. Ralph argues that the post-selected teleportation model allows signalling to past times before the creation of the closed timelike curve.
"we show that modelling closed timelike curves (CTCs) as post-selected teleportation allows signalling to past times before the creation of the CTC"
Problems with modelling closed timelike curves as post-selected teleportation (2011)
[15] documented
Stephen Hawking proposed the Chronology Protection Conjecture, suggesting that quantum effects destroy the classical possibilities for time travel to keep the universe safe for historians.
"Introducing his Chronology Protection Conjecture Stephen Hawking said that it seems that there exists a Chronology Protection Agency making the Universe safe for historians."
There exist consistent temporal logics admitting changes of History (2006)
[16] supported
Novikov's Consistency Conjecture argues that while causal loops allow influence on the past, they do not allow the alteration of the past.
"appealing to consistency conditions (such as in Novikov's Consistency Conjecture) requiring that causal loops, though allowing causal influence on the past, don't allow alteration of the past"
There exist consistent temporal logics admitting changes of History (2006)
[17] supported
The Kay-Radzikowski-Wald singularity theorems state that in the presence of a non-empty chronology-violating set, points on the chronology horizon exist where the two-point function is not of Hadamard form.
"the Kay-Radzikowski-Wald singularity theorems (stating that in presence of a non-empty chronology-violating set there are points of the chronology horizon where the two-point function is not of Hadamard form Q, Q)"
There exist consistent temporal logics admitting changes of History (2006)
[18] supported
Headrick and Gott refuted the claim that the observed absence of time-travellers in the present or past serves as empirical evidence for the physical impossibility of time travel.
"Finally we agree with the Headrick-Gott's [7] refutation of the claim that the observed absence of time-travellers in the present and in the past would be an empirical datum supporting the physical impossibility of time-travel"
There exist consistent temporal logics admitting changes of History (2006)
[19] documented
The document describes a specific mechanism where an agent named Alice branches into two instances upon receiving a message from her older self, ensuring a consistent history on the closed timelike curve.
"When the younger Alice receives this transmission from the older Alice, the younger Alice branches into two instances, each of which sees one of those messages. One of these instances of Alice will travel back in time and the other does not."
On unorthodox qubits, with an application to the closed timelike curve problem (2022)
[20] supported
Models by Deutsch (1991) and Lloyd et al. (2011) for qubits on closed timelike curves are criticized for being formulated in the Schrödinger picture, which makes them not locally realistic.
"There are models of qubits on closed timelike curves that do not encounter this conflict between the kinematic consistency condition (1.4) and the commutation constraint (e.g. Deutsch (1991) and Lloyd et al. (2011)). However, those models are formulated in the Schrödinger picture and are therefore not locally realistic (Raymond-Robichaud (2021))."
On unorthodox qubits, with an application to the closed timelike curve problem (2022)