ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

Can a message really travel back in time, and what would it take?

Research question: Do the laws of physics as currently understood allow a message to travel back to an earlier moment, and what conditions would be required?

The records show that general relativity allows closed timelike curves, but they raise self-consistency problems such as the grandfather paradox 10. Whether physics actually permits them remains unsettled, since the Chronology Protection Conjecture holds that the laws of physics do not allow such curves 31, and the mechanisms that would prevent them are still unknown 1. A message could reach the past only if superluminal interaction were possible, as in a relay scheme where the returning signal can arrive before it was sent 24, yet special relativity alone forbids time loops 5 and there is no evidence that tachyons exist 25. Proposed conditions include self-consistency, where only self-consistent solutions count as physical 16, and a wormhole whose two mouths sit in different gravitational environments 30, though that wormhole would need exotic matter 35 and there is no evidence that usable wormholes exist 32. The newest facts in the record date from October 18, 2026, so they are current as of today 3238.

Checked 2026-10-21. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
Proposed physical mechanisms of chronological protection, which would prevent time travel paradoxes, remain unknown, even when quantum fluctuations near horizons are considered.
"however, such mechanisms remain presently unknown, even when quantum fluctuations near horizons are taken into account."
Closed Timelike Curves, Singularities and Causality: A Survey from Gödel to Chronological Protection (2021)
[2] supported
A message could be sent into the past only if an interaction with superluminal speed were possible; the document describes a relay scheme in which the signal is sent faster than light to a distant relay station.
"Könnte eine solche Wechselwirkung mit Überlichtgeschwindigkeit stattfinden, dann könnte man mit folgendem System eine Botschaft in die Vergangenheit schicken:"
Zeit
[3] supported
In a quantum simulation of closed timelike curves, restrictions appear that are absent in the classical setup, which could be read as an analogue of chronology protection.
"In the quantum simulation, some restrictions appear that are not present in the classical setup, which could be interpreted as an analogue of a chronology protection mechanism."
Closed timelike curves and chronology protection in quantum and classical simulators (2020)
[4] supported
In the relay scheme, if the involved speeds are high enough, the returning signal arrives before the original signal was sent, which would violate causality.
"Schließlich wird das Signal wieder mit Überlichtgeschwindigkeit zurückgesendet. Sind die beteiligten Geschwindigkeiten genügend hoch, so kommt das Signal vor dem Aussenden des Ursprungssignals an."
Zeit
[5] supported
Special relativity forbids time loops: motion can tilt the time axis by at most 45° but cannot reverse it, so past and future cannot be swapped and causality is preserved.
"Allerdings lässt sich durch eine Bewegung die Zeitachse nur um maximal 45° kippen, aber nicht umdrehen. Das heißt, Vergangenheit und Zukunft lassen sich nicht vertauschen, Zeitschleifen sind unmöglich, und die spezielle Relativitätstheorie behält die grundlegende Eigenschaft der Kausalität ."
Zeit
[6] supported
Tachyons, hypothetical faster-than-light particles, would violate causality if they could interact with ordinary matter, and therefore the idea of their existence has few supporters.
"Die Vermutung der Existenz von Tachyonen hat daher kaum Anhänger."
Zeit
[7] supported
The simplest way to keep quantum mechanics on a closed timelike curve consistent is to require that the pure state of the whole system be a single-valued function of time.
"The simplest way to make QM on CTC consistent is to require that the pure state"
Closed Timelike Curves, Superluminal Signals, and “Free Will” in Universal Quantum Mechanics (2012)
[8] supported
If closed timelike curves are permitted, physics would need an added principle of self-consistency: a local solution is allowed only if it extends to a global solution that is well defined throughout the nonsingular regions of spacetime.
"If CTC's are permitted, then the semiclassical laws of physics (the laws with gravity classical and other fields quantized or classical) should be augmented by a principle of self-consistency, which states that a local solution to the equations of physics can occur in the real Universe only if it can be extended to be part of a global solution"
Cauchy problem in spacetimes with closed timelike curves (1990)
[9] supported
In the Deutsch model of closed timelike curves, self-consistency requires that the state of the CTC system after the evolution equals its state before, which is the condition needed for a message or system to return to its earlier state.
"For self-consistency, the Deutsch model requires"
Quantum no-go theorems in causality respecting systems in presence of closed timelike curves: Tweaking the Deutsch condition
[10] supported
General relativity allows closed timelike curves, but they raise self-consistency problems such as the grandfather paradox.
"Although general relativity allows the existence of closed timelike curves (CTCs), self-consistency problems arise (the ‘grandfather paradox’ among others)."
Quantum causality in closed timelike curves (2015)
[11] supported
When a closed timelike curve is present, the self-consistency requirement is generally incompatible with unitary evolution for most initial conditions.
"However, when a CTC is present, then, for most initial conditions |Ψ(0)i, the self-consistency requirement is not compatible with unitary evolution of |Ψ(t)i [6]."
Closed Timelike Curves, Superluminal Signals, and “Free Will” in Universal Quantum Mechanics (2012)
[12] supported
Even in the Deutsch model with closed timelike curves, teleporting quantum information from a causality-respecting region into a closed timelike curve is disallowed, even approximately.
"We prove that teleportation of quantum information,eveninitsapproximateversion,fromaCRregiontoaCTCisdisallowed."
Quantum no-go theorems in causality respecting systems in presence of closed timelike curves: Tweaking the Deutsch condition
[13] supported
Because of this incompatibility, only a small subset of possible initial conditions on a closed timelike curve counts as physically possible.
"Thus, this self-consistency principle implies that only a small subset of possible initial conditions on CTC represents the set of physically possible initial conditions."
Closed Timelike Curves, Superluminal Signals, and “Free Will” in Universal Quantum Mechanics (2012)
[14] supported
For spacetimes with closed timelike curves, the constraints on initial data are described as mild: in a neighborhood of any event, initial data can be specified freely, with data elsewhere adjusted to keep evolution self-consistent.
"the constraints appear to be mild in the sense that in some neighborhood of every event one is free to specify initial data arbitrarily, with the initial data elsewhere being adjusted to guarantee self-consistent evolution"
Cauchy problem in spacetimes with closed timelike curves (1990)
[15] documented
The paper's main result is that time-reversal causality can exist, but the final quantum state does not impose retrospective constraints on the initial state; instead it can influence the state inside the Deutsch CTC.
"The main result is that time reversal causality can really exist, however, the final quantum state does not place retrospective constraints on the initial state, instead the final state can influence the state inside the D-CTC."
Quantum causality in closed timelike curves (2015)
[16] supported
The self-consistency principle avoids time-travel paradoxes such as the grandfather paradox by treating only self-consistent solutions as physical.
"Such paradoxes can be avoided by the self-consistency principle [27, 28], according to which only self-consistent solutions are physical."
Closed Timelike Curves, Superluminal Signals, and “Free Will” in Universal Quantum Mechanics (2012)
[17] supported
For a classical hard-sphere billiard ball in a wormhole spacetime with closed timelike curves, the number of self-consistent motions depends on initial data: some give one unique motion, some give two, and some may give none.
"If the ball is classical, then some choices of initial data (some values of the ball's initial position and velocity) give rise to unique, self-consistent motions of the ball; other choices produce two different self-consistent motions; and others might (but we are not yet sure) produce no self-consistent motions whatsoever."
Cauchy problem in spacetimes with closed timelike curves (1990)
[18] supported
The most popular approach to quantum mechanics on closed timelike curves is Deutsch's nonlinear self-consistency constraint, which is an alternative to imposing consistency on the whole pure state.
"The most popular approach to QM on CTC is the Deutsch [6] nonlinear self-consistency constraint."
Closed Timelike Curves, Superluminal Signals, and “Free Will” in Universal Quantum Mechanics (2012)
[19] documented
In the postselected CTC (P-CTC) model, self-consistency is governed by the traversability of the loop, which depends on the initial state, and a pure initial state always yields a pure final state.
"The P-CTC has radically different properties; in particular, if the initial state was pure, the final state is always pure too. Self-consistency is controlled by the initial state-dependent traversability of the P-CTC."
Quantum causality in closed timelike curves (2015)
[20] supported
Stephen Hawking treats the fact that no time traveler has ever appeared as experimental evidence that time travel is not possible.
"ephen Hawking betrachtet die Tatsache, dass kein Zeitreisender erschienen ist, als experimentelles Indiz dafür, dass Zeitreisen nicht möglich sind."
Zeitreise
[21] supported
The Novikov self-consistency principle is a conjecture made by the Russian astrophysicist Igor Novikov in the 1980s to eliminate paradoxes of time-travel theory.
"Das Nowikow-Selbstübereinstimmungprinzip ist eine Vermutung, die von dem russischen Astrophysiker Igor Nowikow in den 1980er Jahren gemacht wurde, um die Paradoxa der Zeitreisetheorie zu eliminieren."
Nowikow-Selbstübereinstimmungsprinzip
[22] supported
The principle avoids paradoxes by assuming that any event that would imply a paradox is extremely improbable.
"Dies wird erreicht, indem vorausgesetzt wird, dass ein Ereignis, welches ein Paradoxon implizieren würde, gänzlich unwahrscheinlich ist."
Nowikow-Selbstübereinstimmungsprinzip
[23] supported
In the many-worlds picture, a time traveler could never return to their original version of the present, but could return to a parallel world that is nearly identical to it.
"Insbesondere wäre es für den Reisenden unmöglich, wieder in seine ursprüngliche Version der Gegenwart zurückzukehren, wohl aber in eine Parallelwelt, die dieser nahezu identisch wäre."
Zeitreise
[24] supported
In Novikov's billiard-ball model, a ball is sent into a wormhole so that it travels back in time and collides with an earlier version of itself, deflecting it from the path that let it enter the wormhole.
"Er stellte sich eine Billardkugel vor, die präzise in ein Wurmloch gestoßen würde, exakt so, dass sie in der Zeit zurückreisen und mit einer früheren Version ihrer selbst zusammenstoßen würde und somit sich selbst von der Bahn ablenken würde, die es überhaupt ermöglichte, in das besagte Wurmloch zu fallen"
Nowikow-Selbstübereinstimmungsprinzip
[25] supported
There is no evidence that tachyons, hypothetical faster-than-light particles, actually exist, and a hypothetical faster-than-light motion cannot by itself establish the possibility of time travel.
"Aus einer hypothetisch überlichtschnellen Bewegung die Möglichkeit einer Reise in die Vergangenheit abzuleiten, ist nicht möglich. Es existieren jedoch keine Belege für die Existenz von Tachyonen."
Zeitreise
[26] supported
Novikov concluded that a time traveler, whatever they tried to do, could never create a paradox, because self-consistent trajectories have nonzero probability while self-erasing events have zero probability.
"Die Wahrscheinlichkeit für ein derartiges Phänomen würde aber höher als Null sein, wohingegen die Wahrscheinlichkeit für die Selbstauslöschung des Ereignisses Null wäre, und daher schloss Nowikow, dass ein Zeitreisender, egal was er auch anstellen würde, niemals ein Paradoxon erzeugen würde können."
Nowikow-Selbstübereinstimmungsprinzip
[27] supported
A ring wormhole could, in theory, form closed timelike curves, which are paths that loop back to the same point in space and time, but only under the right gravitational conditions.
"A new analysis suggests a ring wormhole could, in theory, form closed timelike curves under the right gravitational conditions."
Wormholes may enable time travel, astrophysicists find - The Brighter Side of News
[28] supported
Some mathematical solutions to Einstein's equations contain paths through spacetime that loop back into the past, called closed timelike curves.
"Some mathematical solutions to Einstein’s equations contain paths through spacetime that loop back into the past."
Time Travel: Do I Need a Round-Trip Ticket?
[29] supported
A closed timelike curve is a path through spacetime that takes an object both to the past and the future, which is the mechanism that would allow time travel.
"This is when an object's trajectory through spacetime takes it both to the past and the future, connecting the two and allowing for time travel."
Scientists Say Quantum Physics Could Actually Allow Messages To Travel Back In Time - BGR
[30] supported
The required setup needs one wormhole mouth to sit in a different gravitational environment from the other, so that clocks at the two mouths fall out of sync for a distant observer.
"If the two mouths of the wormhole are connected through spacetime, but one sits in a different gravitational environment from the other, clocks at the mouths no longer stay synchronized in the same way for a distant observer."
Wormholes may enable time travel, astrophysicists find - The Brighter Side of News
[31] supported
Solutions containing closed timelike curves conflict with the Chronology Protection Conjecture, which states that the laws of physics do not allow closed timelike curves.
"Such solutions are in conflict with the Chronology Protection Conjecture, stating that the laws of physics does not allow closed timelike curves"
There and back again
[32] supported
There is no evidence that usable wormholes exist, and proposals to keep one open require unusual physical conditions that scientists do not know how to create or sustain on the necessary scale.
"We have no evidence that usable wormholes exist. Proposals for keeping one open often require unusual physical conditions that we do not know how to create or sustain on the necessary scale."
Time Travel: Do I Need a Round-Trip Ticket?
[33] supported
The researchers used post-selected closed timelike curves, which only allow time loops that avoid paradox, so that time travelers could sidestep the grandfather paradox.
"they utilized post-selected closed timelike curves (P-CTCs), which could allow time travelers to avoid the dreaded grandfather paradox ."
Scientists Say Quantum Physics Could Actually Allow Messages To Travel Back In Time - BGR
[34] supported
Closed timelike curves were first described in general relativity by Van Stockum in 1937 and by Gödel in 1949, using rotating solutions.
"CTCs were first described by Van Stockum in 1937"
There and back again
[35] supported
The wormhole itself is exotic, since its ring must carry matter that violates the null energy condition.
"The ring carries the kind of matter distribution needed to violate the null energy condition."
Wormholes may enable time travel, astrophysicists find - The Brighter Side of News
[36] supported
The idea is still unproven, and the team reportedly plans to build a model setup using photons to test it.
"This is all just a theory right now, but the team reportedly plans to create a model setup to actually test it using photons."
Scientists Say Quantum Physics Could Actually Allow Messages To Travel Back In Time - BGR
[37] supported
Hawking's chronology protection idea holds that quantum effects may prevent closed timelike curves from ever forming in a real spacetime, and this remains unresolved for the ring model.
"the idea that quantum effects may prevent closed timelike curves from ever forming in a real spacetime."
Wormholes may enable time travel, astrophysicists find - The Brighter Side of News
[38] supported
Einstein's relativity shows that time passes at different rates for different observers, and this time dilation has been measured, so travel into the future is physically possible.
"Einstein’s theories of relativity tell us that time does not pass at the same rate for everyone. Motion and gravity affect the time measured by a clock. This effect, called time dilation , has been measured."
Time Travel: Do I Need a Round-Trip Ticket?
[39] supported
In the Kerr black hole solution, closed timelike curves appear only inside the inner horizon.
"the well-known solution of a Kerr black hole (although in this case, the CTC appears inside the inner horizon)"
There and back again
[40] supported
In general relativity, closed timelike curves are usually hidden behind a horizon, and in certain circumstances they can let observers travel to their own causal past.
"can in certain circumstances allow observers to travel to their own causal past"
There and back again