ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

Can a message sent back in time really happen, and what would stop it?

Research question: Why do physicists take the idea of a message going back in time seriously enough to write about it, and what would stop such a message from contradicting history?

Physicists take the idea seriously because, in general relativity, time machines appear relatively easy to construct from benign initial conditions such as traversable wormholes or infinite cosmic strings 22. Within quantum mechanics, CTC interactions appear to allow superluminal, effectively instantaneous signaling because of entanglement 4. Proposed safeguards against contradiction include the Novikov self-consistency principle, which holds that only globally self-consistent solutions can occur 3436, and Deutsch's self-consistency condition on the density matrix of a CTC qubit 6. The records also show these safeguards are incomplete: D-CTC models give no systematic explanation of why grandfather-type paradoxes never occur 7, and the mechanisms proposed for chronology protection are not guaranteed to work 27. The newest of these facts dates to May 9, 2026, about five months before October 2026 3133.

Checked 2026-10-22. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
Geroch thought the status of closed timelike curves mattered for whether his program for refining the notion of a singular point, using extensions, could work.
"would have an important bearing on whether or not the"
An extendible spacetime without closed timelike curves whose every extension contains closed timelike curves
[2] supported
A closed timelike curve is a hypothetical concept in general relativity in which a worldline loops back on itself, so a particle can return to and interact with its own past.
"spacetime looping back on itself, allowing a particle to"
Experimental simulation of postselected closed timelike curves for decoding scrambled quantum information
[3] supported
Physicists have studied the consequences of closed timelike curves for quantum mechanics using path-integral approaches aimed at avoiding contradictions.
"employing path-integral approaches in an effort to avoid contradictions [5,4]"
Perfect state distinguishability and computational speedups with postselected closed timelike curves
[4] supported
Because of entanglement, CTC interactions appear to allow superluminal and effectively instantaneous signaling, which is why the idea is taken seriously.
"As a consequence, there is a prima facie argument exploiting entanglement that CTC"
Quantum Interactions with Closed Timelike Curves and Superluminal Signaling
[5] supported
The construction removes points from time-rolled Minkowski spacetime so that every closed timelike curve passes through a removed 'barrier' set, which is what eliminates all such curves in the punctured spacetime.
"we construct a “barrier” B such that each CTC in time-rolled"
An extendible spacetime without closed timelike curves whose every extension contains closed timelike curves
[6] supported
Deutsch proposed imposing a self-consistency condition on the density matrix of a CTC qubit to avoid grandfather-like paradoxes.
"and he suggested imposing a self-consistency condition on the density matrix of a CTC qubit in order to avoid grandfather-like paradoxes."
Perfect state distinguishability and computational speedups with postselected closed timelike curves
[7] supported
Classical grandfather-paradox scenarios can be mimicked by D-CTC relay circuits, yet D-CTCs give no systematic explanation of why such paradoxes never occur.
"D-CTCs don’t provide any systematic explanation of why we fail."
Quantum Interactions with Closed Timelike Curves and Superluminal Signaling
[8] supported
The proof idea is that any proper extension of the punctured spacetime must fill in a point of the barrier, because time-rolled Minkowski spacetime is geodesically complete, and filling one point fills nearby points too, which then yields closed timelike curves.
"The idea of the proof is that any proper extension of M− has to fill in a point"
An extendible spacetime without closed timelike curves whose every extension contains closed timelike curves
[9] documented
Stephen Hawking proposed a 'Chronology protection conjecture' in 1992, which suggests a mechanism to prevent causality violations like time travel.
"Hawking, S.W. (1992) Chronology protection conjecture, Physical Review D 56 , 4745–4755."
Time, Closed Timelike Curves and Causality (2003)
[10] documented
John Richard Gott demonstrated in 1991 that pairs of moving cosmic strings can produce closed timelike curves, a specific mechanism for time travel.
"Gott, J.R. (1991) Closed timelike curves produced by pairs of moving cosmic strings: exact solutions, Physical Review Letters 66 , 1126–1129."
Time, Closed Timelike Curves and Causality (2003)
[11] documented
Kip Thorne and colleagues showed in 1988 that wormholes could function as time machines, linking them to the weak energy condition.
"Morris, M., Thorne, K.S. and Yurtsever, U. (1988) Wormholes, time machines and the weak energy condition, Physical Review Letters 61 , 1446–1449."
Time, Closed Timelike Curves and Causality (2003)
[12] documented
Francisco Echeverria and others analyzed the physical consistency of objects interacting with their past selves in wormhole spacetimes in 1991.
"Echeverria, F.G., Klinkhammer, G., and Thorne, K.S. (1991) Billiard balls in wormhole spacetimes with closed timelike curves, Physical Review D 44 , 1077–1099."
Time, Closed Timelike Curves and Causality (2003)
[13] documented
Miguel Alcubierre proposed a 'warp drive' concept in 1994 that allows hyper-fast travel within general relativity, which has implications for causality.
"Alcubierre, M. (1994) The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity, Classical Quantum Gravity 11 , L73–L77."
Time, Closed Timelike Curves and Causality (2003)
[14] documented
Physicists take the idea of messages going back in time seriously because generalized quantum mechanics applied to spacetimes with closed timelike curves (CTCs) predicts measurable acausal effects, such as deviations in scattering cross-sections, even if the CTCs are in the future.
"Generalized quantum mechanics is used to examine a simple two-particle scattering experiment in which there is a bounded region of closed timelike curves (CTCs) in the experiment’s future. The transitional probability is shown to depend on the existence and distribution of the CTCs. The effect is therefore acausal, since the CTCs are in the experiment’s causal future."
Testing causality violation on spacetimes with closed timelike curves (1998)
[15] documented
The mechanism behind these acausal effects is the non-unitary evolution of particles as they pass through regions of closed timelike curves.
"The effect is due to the non-unitary evolution of the pre- and post-scatteringparticlesastheypassthroughtheregionofCTCs."
Testing causality violation on spacetimes with closed timelike curves (1998)
[16] documented
For a human-scale time machine located 1 meter away with a 1-meter spatial identification and 1-second temporal identification, the predicted deviation in the total cross-section is 1 part in 10^15.
"For a identified region 1 meter from the scattering center with L = 1m and T = 1s, the deviation is 1 part in 1015."
Testing causality violation on spacetimes with closed timelike curves (1998)
[17] documented
The deviation caused by a single Planck-scale or human-scale time machine is negligible compared to typical experimental errors, such as the measurement of the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron which has an accuracy of 1 part in 10^11.
"We will use this result as a upper bound on the sensitivity of total cross-section measurements. Therefore, the deviation we have calculated in the total-cross section dueto a Politzer time machine in our futureis negligible compared to the experimental error associated with the measurement."
Testing causality violation on spacetimes with closed timelike curves (1998)
[18] documented
Spacetimes where time machines are distributed everywhere except along the trajectory of the pre-scattering particles are ruled out because they predict an infinite deviation in the total cross-section, which is considered absurd.
"Therefore, Hartle’s prescription predicts an infinitedeviation in the total cross section in this case, which is clearly absurd, so such spacetimes are ruled out."
Testing causality violation on spacetimes with closed timelike curves (1998)
[19] documented
Hawking proposed the chronology protection conjecture in response to the disturbing possibility that wormholes could become time machines.
"This extremely disturbing state of affairs has lead Hawking to promulgate his chronology protection conjecture."
Hawking's chronology protection conjecture: singularity structure of the quantum stress--energy tensor (1993)
[20] documented
The formation of a closed timelike curve, which constitutes a time machine, occurs when the geodetic interval from a point to itself becomes negative.
"If the geodetic interval from x to itself, cr 7 (x,x), becomes negative then a closed timelike curve (a fortiori — a time machine) has formed."
Hawking's chronology protection conjecture: singularity structure of the quantum stress--energy tensor (1993)
[21] supported
Hawking's chronology protection conjecture is intended to prevent the formation of closed timelike curves.
"It is this unfortunate happenstance that Hawking's chronology protection conjecture is hoped to prevent."
Hawking's chronology protection conjecture: singularity structure of the quantum stress--energy tensor (1993)
[22] documented
Physicists take the idea of time travel seriously because it appears relatively easy to construct time machines in general relativity using benign initial conditions like traversable wormholes or infinite cosmic strings.
"The recent interest in "time machines" has been largely fueled by the apparent ease with which such systems may be formed in general relativity, given relatively benign initial conditions such as the existence of traversable wormholes or of infinite cosmic strings."
From wormhole to time machine: Comments on Hawking's Chronology Protection Conjecture (1992)
[23] documented
Hawking's Chronology Protection Conjecture specifically forbids the existence of closed non-spacelike curves, which would allow time travel.
"Less restrictively the Hawking Chronology Protection Conjecture allows the existence of wormholes but forbids the existence of time travel |T],0]: "Suffer not closed non-spacelike curves to exist"."
From wormhole to time machine: Comments on Hawking's Chronology Protection Conjecture (1992)
[24] supported
The lack of observed tourists from the future is cited as experimental evidence supporting the idea that time travel is impossible.
"Both the experimental evidence (the nonappearance of hordes of tourists from the future) and the theoretical computations now support this conjecture."
From wormhole to time machine: Comments on Hawking's Chronology Protection Conjecture (1992)
[25] supported
Physicists take the idea of time travel seriously because it is generally believed that attempts to create closed timelike curves (CTCs) will fail due to the 'chronology protection conjecture,' which posits that the laws of physics conspire to prevent the manufacturing of time machines.
"It is generally believed that any attempt to introduce closed timelike curves (CTCs) into the universe will fall foul of the chronology protection conjecture 0, which states that the laws of Physics somehow conspire to prevent one from manufacturing time machines."
Models for Chronology Selection (1997)
[26] supported
One proposed mechanism to stop time travel is the back reaction of the renormalised energy-momentum tensor, which was shown to diverge at the Cauchy horizon in causality-violating spacetimes, potentially preventing the formation of CTCs.
"Early calculations supporting this conjecture concentrated on the behaviour of the renor- malised energy-momentum tensor (T^), which was shown to diverge at the Cauchy horizon in a number of causality violating spacetimes. A possible mechanism for enforcement of chronology protection was therefore proposed as the back reaction of this divergent energy- momentum on the spacetime geometry via the se"
Models for Chronology Selection (1997)
[27] documented
The mechanism of energy-momentum divergence is not guaranteed to enforce chronology protection, as calculations for scalar fields in specific spacetimes like Gott space and Grant space showed that the tensor could remain regular at the Cauchy horizon for sufficiently massive fields.
"Boulware ||] and Tanaka and Hiscock || both found that for sufficiently massive fields in Gott space and Grant space respectively, (T^) could remain regular at the Cauchy horizon."
Models for Chronology Selection (1997)
[28] documented
In the context of the 3dS x S^1 spacetime, the amount of boost momentum required to develop closed timelike curves is infinite, and the entropy diverges to minus infinity, meaning there are no quantum states available for these causality-violating configurations.
"There is a critical boost at which the spacetime will develop CTCs (when a = (3/r), but the amount of boost momentum that is needed to achieve this is once again infinite and the entropy diverges to minus infinity at this critical value. In this case, therefore, there are no quantum states available for these causality violating field configurations."
Models for Chronology Selection (1997)
[29] supported
Closed time-like curves being possible inside our universe has long been a conjecture, and it was more recently revived by a series of papers.
"The possibility that the laws of physics might allow for the existence of closed time-like curves (CTCs) inside our universe has been a long time conjecture [1], which has been more recently revived by a series of papers [2–15]."
ERRATA: "TIME MACHINES: THE PRINCIPLE OF SELF-CONSISTENCY AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MINIMAL ACTION" (1996)
[30] supported
Wormhole stability depends heavily on negative energy densities, which agrees with theoretical predictions but is limited by the lack of observed exotic matter.
"Wormhole simulations revealed that stability is highly dependent on negative energy densities, aligning with theoretical predictions but constrained by the absence of observable exotic matter."
THE PHYSICS OF TIME TRAVEL: POSSIBILITIES AND PARADOXES (2022)
[31] supported
Physicists say closed timelike curves, a loop in spacetime predicted by Einstein's relativity, could in principle let information return to an earlier point in time.
"One of the main ideas being studied is the “closed timelike curve,” a theoretical loop in spacetime predicted by Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity. According to scientists, such loops could potentially allow information to return to an earlier point in time without violating known physical laws."
Quantum Physics Research Revives Debate Over Possibility Of Sending Messages Back In Time
[32] supported
Wormhole geometries could in principle exist if matter violates the averaged weak energy conditions, and they can be exact solutions of Einstein's equations.
"Provided the matter density in some regions of our universe satisfies certain properties (i.e. it violates the so-called ‘averaged weak energy conditions,’ see, e.g., Refs. [3–6]), these 4-d Lorentzian wormhole geometries could, in principle, exist (at least they can be exact solutions of the Einstein equations)."
ERRATA: "TIME MACHINES: THE PRINCIPLE OF SELF-CONSISTENCY AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MINIMAL ACTION" (1996)
[33] supported
In some quantum experiments with entangled photons, the photons appeared to exchange information in ways that seemed retroactive, but no person or object actually travelled through time.
"In some studies, photons appeared to exchange information in ways that seemed retroactive, though researchers emphasised that no actual human or object travelled through time."
Quantum Physics Research Revives Debate Over Possibility Of Sending Messages Back In Time
[34] supported
The Novikov self-consistency principle says that only solutions that are globally self-consistent can occur in spacetimes with closed timelike curves, which is the physical constraint that makes such loops possible without contradiction.
"It states that the only solutions to the laws of physics that can occur in spacetimes containing closed timelike curves are those that are globally self-consistent"
Bootstrap Amplification: A Computational Analogue of the Bootstrap Paradox Governed by the Novikov Self-Consistency Principle (2026)
[35] supported
Generic relative motion of a wormhole's two mouths, or gravitational redshift at the mouths, can in principle produce closed time-like curves, so traversing the wormhole lets one travel into the past or future.
"if the wormhole is traversed from mouth to mouth, it acts as a ‘time machine’ allowing one to travel into the past or into the future."
ERRATA: "TIME MACHINES: THE PRINCIPLE OF SELF-CONSISTENCY AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MINIMAL ACTION" (1996)
[36] supported
Under the Novikov principle, no locally initiated event can create a contradiction, so the consistency constraint is what prevents paradoxes.
"and no locally initiated event can create a contradiction."
Bootstrap Amplification: A Computational Analogue of the Bootstrap Paradox Governed by the Novikov Self-Consistency Principle (2026)
[37] supported
The Principle of self-consistency, which restricts physically possible local events to those globally consistent around time loops, was explicitly formulated in the literature on these spacetimes.
"This requirement has been explicitly formulated as the ‘Principle of self-consistency,’ according to which the only solutions to the laws of physics that can occur locally in the real universe are those which are globally self-consistent [7, 9, 13–15]."
ERRATA: "TIME MACHINES: THE PRINCIPLE OF SELF-CONSISTENCY AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MINIMAL ACTION" (1996)
[38] supported
For a particle with fixed initial and final positions that traverses the wormhole once, the classical trajectories that minimize the action are exactly the globally self-consistent ones, so self-consistency follows from minimal action.
"the only possible trajectories (for a particle with fixed initial and final positions and which traverses the wormhole once) minimizing the classical action are those which are globally self-consistent, and that the ‘Principle of self-consistency’ (originally introduced by Novikov) is thus a natural consequence of the ‘Principle of minimal action.’"
ERRATA: "TIME MACHINES: THE PRINCIPLE OF SELF-CONSISTENCY AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MINIMAL ACTION" (1996)
[39] supported
In the bootstrap paradox, a traveller acquires a document at a later time, carries it back to an earlier time, and delivers it so that the traveller can read it later, creating a loop.
"The canonical example: a traveller acquires a document at time t₂, travels to t₁ < t₂, and delivers that document to an agent who publishes it, so that the traveller can read it at t₂."
Bootstrap Amplification: A Computational Analogue of the Bootstrap Paradox Governed by the Novikov Self-Consistency Principle (2026)
[40] supported
Novikov and colleagues observed that self-consistent solutions to such loops arise naturally from imposing fixed-point boundary conditions.
"Crucially, Novikov and colleagues observe that self-consistent solutions to such loops arise naturally from the imposition of fixed-point boundary conditions [1]."
Bootstrap Amplification: A Computational Analogue of the Bootstrap Paradox Governed by the Novikov Self-Consistency Principle (2026)