ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

How did the Templars' relations with nobles change their Holy Land property?

Research question: What do the surviving sources say about how the changing relationship between the Templars and the Frankish nobility in the Holy Land affected the Order's landholdings?

The records show that in the 13th century the Templars held four fortresses in the Kingdom of Jerusalem, including Sidon and Beaufort, which were ceded by Julien, lord of Sidon 1. Around 1235, the Templars reportedly received a large monetary payment and recognition of their sovereignty over all their possessions in the Amanus Mountains 3. Their conduct in the 1230s strained relations with the Antiochene prince, and Armand of Périgord agreed to attack the Armenian kingdom with Bohemond V to avenge Templars executed by Hethoum 4. The provided facts do not directly explain how these shifting ties with the Frankish nobility shaped the Order's landholdings over time, and the only later fact concerns the Hospitallers obtaining much Templar property after the suppression 2. The newest dated fact runs from 1312 onward, roughly 714 years before October 2026 2.

Checked 2026-10-20. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
In the 13th century the Templars held four fortresses in the Kingdom of Jerusalem, including Sidon and Beaufort, which were ceded by Julien, lord of Sidon.
"le château de Sidon et la forteresse de Beaufort tous deux cédés par Julien, seigneur de Sidon en 1260"
Ordre du Temple
[2] supported
After the Templars' suppression, the Hospitallers worked to enforce papal decisions and obtained much of the Templar property, in opposition to Philip the Fair's wish to seize it.
"Philippe le Bel voulant mettre la main sur certains des biens des Templiers, les Hospitaliers n'auront de cesse de faire respecter les décisions papales, et finiront par obtenir à peu près partout, là où était décidée la dévolution des biens des Templiers"
Ordre du Temple
[3] supported
Other concessions to the Templars reportedly included a large monetary payment and recognition of Templar sovereignty over all the Temple's possessions in the Amanus Mountains.
"but other concessions such as a large monetary payment and recognition of Templar sovereignty over all the Temple’s possessions in the Amanus Mounta"
The Latin principality of Antioch and its relationship with the Armenian kingdom of Cilicia, 1188-1268 (2016)
[4] supported
Templar behaviour in the 1230s strained the Order's relationship with the Antiochene prince, and Armand of Périgord agreed to attack the Armenian kingdom with Bohemond V to avenge Templars executed by Hethoum.
"the behaviour of the Templars in the 1230s must have strained the Order’s relationship with the Antiochene prince. In c.1235 Armand of Périgord, the Master of the Temple, agreed to launch an attack upon the Armenian kingdom with Bohemond V in order to avenge the deaths of several Templars who had been executed by Hethoum for stirring up trouble against him."
The Latin principality of Antioch and its relationship with the Armenian kingdom of Cilicia, 1188-1268 (2016)