ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: thin

Do Templar record books match the 1150 pilgrim IOU, or use different terms?

Research question: Do the pilgrim deposit and redemption terms in the Cartulaire général de l'Ordre du Temple (Delaville Le Roulx edition) or any other published Templar cartulary match the 1150 promissory-note description, and if not, what terms do they use?

The verified facts do not describe the Delaville Le Roulx cartulary, any other published Templar cartulary, or the 1150 promissory-note description, so they cannot show whether the terms match 12. They do show that the Templars financed crusaders by taking real estate as collateral in a sale contract with a promise of repurchase at a premium, a mechanism called a mortgage 1. They also show that the Templars pioneered bills of exchange to pay sums in the East using funds deposited in the West, without physically moving the money 2. The facts do not establish whether either mechanism is the same as, or different from, a pilgrim deposit and redemption term. The newest fact is dated only to the 12th-13th centuries, so it is not recent relative to October 2026 12.

Checked 2026-10-21. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
The Templars financed crusaders by taking their real estate as collateral through a sale contract with a promise of repurchase at a premium, a mechanism called a mortgage.
"Le Temple apporte aussi un financement aux seigneurs qui projettent de partir en croisade, prenant en garantie leur domaine immobilier sous forme d'un acte de vente sous promesse de rachat avec plus-value, appelé à cette époque mortgage ."
Procès de l'ordre du Temple
[2] supported
The Templars pioneered the use of bills of exchange (escompte des traites) to pay sums in the East using funds deposited in the West without physically transporting the money.
"Ce réseau international lui permet d'être précurseur dans l'utilisation des billets payés de place en place, ou escompte des traites, c'est-à-dire de payer à une personne en Orient, une somme remise en Occident, ou inversement, sans avoir à effectuer le transport spécial de l'argent remis."
Procès de l'ordre du Temple