ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

Do US and EU rules for app earnings differ, including tax forms for 2026?

Research question: What US federal and state rules (for example, IRS platform reporting forms and thresholds, and state worker classification standards) govern online platform income for 2026, and how do they compare with EU DAC7 and DAC8 reporting?

For 2026, the federal Form 1099-K threshold is over $20,000 in gross payments across more than 200 transactions for goods and services 11. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act also raised the Form 1099-MISC and 1099-NEC reporting threshold from $600 to $2,000 for payments made in 2026 12. Several states set their own 1099-K threshold at $600 regardless of transaction count, so a seller may receive a state form even when the federal threshold is not met 21. On classification, California's AB 5, effective January 1, 2020, codified the Dynamex standard 2, and laws governing classification are subject to conflicting standards between state and federal law and among states and municipalities 6. The facts do not cover DAC8 thresholds or a full EU comparison; the only DAC7/DAC8 fact is that updated Danish rules took effect January 1, 2026 31, and the EU presumption of employment based on employer control is noted in 1.

Checked 2026-10-22. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] documented
The EU Directive No. 7212/24 of March 8, 2024, establishes a presumption of an employment relationship based on the employer's control over the labor process.
"Особое внимание обращено на характеристику новелл, привносимых в европейское законодательство посредством Директивы ЕС от 8 марта 2024 г. № 7212/24. Показано, что основная цель ее принятия — установление презумпции наличия трудовых отношений через критерий их признания — факт контроля процесса труда и руководства им работодателем."
The EU Initiative for Legal Regulation of Labor of Digital Platform Employees (2025)
[2] documented
California's AB 5, signed in September 2019 and effective January 1, 2020, codified the Dynamex standard for determining worker classification.
"For example, the California Legislature passed AB 5, which was signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom on September 18, 2019 and became effective on January 1, 2020. AB 5 codified the Dynamex standard regarding co"
425 DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) (CIK 0001792789) 2022-04-19
[3] documented
DoorDash faces legal challenges regarding worker classification that have increased in volume since the California Supreme Court's 2018 ruling in Dynamex.
"DoorDash has been involved in and continues to be involved in numerous legal proceedings related to Dasher classification, and such proceedings have increased in volume since the California Supreme Court's 2018 ruling in Dynamex"
425 DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) (CIK 0001792789) 2022-04-19
[4] documented
An action challenging DoorDash's worker classification was brought by the San Francisco District Attorney in June 2020.
"including an action brought by the San Francisco District Attorney in June 2020"
425 DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) (CIK 0001792789) 2022-04-19
[5] documented
Some jurisdictions are considering implementing standards similar to the Dynamex test to determine worker classification.
"In addition, some jurisdictions are considering implementing standards similar to the test set forth in Dynamex to determine worker classification."
425 DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) (CIK 0001792789) 2022-04-19
[6] documented
Laws governing worker classification and other aspects of the platform relationship are subject to varying interpretations and conflicting standards between state and federal law, as well as between individual states and municipalities.
"The scope and interpretation of these laws, and whether they are applicable to DoorDash, are often uncertain and may be conflicting, including varying standards and interpretations between state and federal law, between individual states, and even at the city and municipality level."
425 DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) (CIK 0001792789) 2022-04-19
[7] documented
Upwork offers a service to help classify freelancers as employees of third-party staffing providers or independent contractors, indemnifying clients from misclassification risk subject to applicable law.
"ce we help classify freelancers as employees of third-party staffing providers or independent contractors. For clients that subscribe to this service, subject to applicable law and the terms of our agreement with the client, we indemnify clients from misclassification risk and make warranties to the client (e.g., as to compliance with applicable laws)."
10-Q Upwork Inc. (UPWK) (CIK 0001627475) 2020-08-04
[8] documented
Misclassification of freelancers as independent contractors can result in tax, wage, and hour liabilities for Upwork or its users depending on the jurisdiction.
"In general, any time a court or administrative agency determines that we or our clients that use our platform have misclassified a freelancer as an independent contractor, we or our users could incur tax and other liabilities for failing to properly withhold or pay taxes on the freelancer’s compensation as well as potential wage and hour and other liabilities depending on the circumstances and jur"
10-Q Upwork Inc. (UPWK) (CIK 0001627475) 2020-08-04
[9] documented
Upwork may be subject to administrative inquiries and audits regarding the taxation and classification of its workers and platform users.
"We may be subject to administrative inquiries and audits concerning the taxation and classification of our workers and the users of our platform."
10-Q Upwork Inc. (UPWK) (CIK 0001627475) 2020-08-04
[10] supported
For tax year 2026, the federal Form 1099-K reporting threshold is more than $20,000 in payments and more than 200 transactions.
"the federal Form 1099-K reporting threshold remains more than $20,000 in payments and more than 200 transactions for calendar year 2026 (forms issued in early 2027)."
What to Know About the New 1099-K Reporting Threshold
[11] supported
For 2026, the federal reporting threshold for Form 1099-K is over $20,000 in gross payments across more than 200 transactions for goods and services.
"As of 2026, the federal reporting threshold for Form 1099-K has returned to over $20,000 in gross payments across more than 200 transactions for goods and services."
Updated 2026 IRS 1099 Reporting Requirements
[12] supported
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act raises the Form 1099-MISC and 1099-NEC reporting threshold from $600 to $2,000, starting with payments made in 2026.
"First, the law raises the reporting threshold for Form 1099-MISC and Form 1099-NEC from $600 to $2,000, starting with payments made in 2026."
1099 Reporting Thresholds: 2026 Changes Explained
[13] supported
Payment apps and online marketplaces must generally issue Form 1099-K only when a seller receives more than $20,000 for goods and services and has more than 200 transactions in the calendar year, for calendar years 2025 and 2026.
"Payment apps and online marketplaces (third-party settlement organizations) must generally issue Form 1099-K only when you receive more than $20,000 for goods and services and have more than 200 transactions in the calendar year."
What to Know About the New 1099-K Reporting Threshold
[14] supported
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 reversed the lower $600 Form 1099-K threshold that the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act had set.
"This change, enacted through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 , reverses the planned, significantly lower $600 threshold established by the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)."
Updated 2026 IRS 1099 Reporting Requirements
[15] supported
The OBBBA reverts the Form 1099-K threshold to $20,000 in total payments and more than 200 transactions, applied retroactively to 2022.
"the OBBBA reverts the Form 1099-K reporting threshold to its pre-2022 level: $20,000 in total payments and more than 200 transactions. This change is retroactive, applying as far back as 2022"
1099 Reporting Thresholds: 2026 Changes Explained
[16] supported
Starting in 2011, payment processors reported electronic payments received by businesses, such as credit card payments, to the IRS and to the businesses via the new Form 1099-K.
"Beginning in 2011, electronic payments received by businesses (for example, credit card payments) were reported to the IRS and businesses by the firms processing these payments, via the new Form 1099-K."
Does Credit-card Information Reporting Improve Small-business Tax Compliance? (2015)
[17] supported
The One Big Beautiful Bill retroactively reinstated the prior federal rule, so the lower federal thresholds of $2,500 for 2025 and $600 for 2026 do not apply.
"The OBBB retroactively reinstated the prior federal rule, so these lower federal thresholds do not apply."
What to Know About the New 1099-K Reporting Threshold
[18] supported
The 2025 Tax Act repealed the phased implementation process for 2025 and later years, and the current third-party settlement organization threshold is cited to IRC §6050W.
"The 2025 Tax Act repealed the phased implementation process for 2025 and later. The current threshold for TPSOs is gross 3rd party transactions of more than $20,000 and more than 200 transactions. Please see IRC §6050W for more detail."
Updated 2026 IRS 1099 Reporting Requirements
[19] supported
Payment card processors must report all card transactions with no minimum, while third-party settlement organizations like PayPal and Venmo issue Form 1099-K only above $20,000 and 200 transactions.
"This threshold doesn’t apply to credit card transactions. Credit, debit, gift, and other stored-value card payments have no minimum threshold , so payment card processors must report all transactions, regardless of the amount."
1099 Reporting Thresholds: 2026 Changes Explained
[20] supported
Form 1099-MISC required the purchasing entity to report to the IRS any payments of $600 or more for services provided in a year.
"Form 1099-MISC requires that payments of $600 or more for services provided in a given year be reported to the IRS by the entity purchasing the service."
Does Credit-card Information Reporting Improve Small-business Tax Compliance? (2015)
[21] supported
Several states set their Form 1099-K reporting threshold at just $600 regardless of the number of transactions, so a seller may receive a 1099-K from a state even if the federal threshold is not met.
"several states set their reporting threshold at just $600, no matter how many transactions you have."
What to Know About the New 1099-K Reporting Threshold
[22] supported
Platforms such as payment apps and online marketplaces must send Form 1099-K to both the taxpayer and the IRS.
"These organizations are required to send Form 1099-K both to you and the IRS."
Updated 2026 IRS 1099 Reporting Requirements
[23] supported
After Form 1099-K reporting began, affected sole proprietors who were more likely to file declaring business income increased their reported receipts by up to 24 percent.
"Information reporting made these taxpayers more likely to file a return declaring business income, and increased filers’ reported receipts by up to 24 percent."
Does Credit-card Information Reporting Improve Small-business Tax Compliance? (2015)
[24] supported
If a payee does not provide a valid taxpayer identification number, the IRS requires third-party payment platforms to withhold 24% of gross proceeds as backup withholding, which can trigger a Form 1099-K even below the federal threshold.
"In the absence of a valid TIN, the IRS requires third-party payment platforms to withhold 24% of your gross proceeds as backup withholding"
What to Know About the New 1099-K Reporting Threshold
[25] supported
Taxpayers must report all taxable income even if they do not receive a Form 1099-K.
"Even if you do not receive a Form 1099-K, you are still legally required to report all taxable income on your tax return."
Updated 2026 IRS 1099 Reporting Requirements
[26] supported
The backup withholding threshold rises to $2,000 to align with the new 1099-MISC and 1099-NEC threshold.
"The backup withholding threshold rises to $2,000, aligned with the new 1099-MISC and 1099-NEC threshold"
1099 Reporting Thresholds: 2026 Changes Explained
[27] supported
Affected small businesses largely offset their higher reported receipts with higher reported expenses, which are not subject to information reporting, so the effect on reported net taxable income was diminished.
"Taxpayers largely offset increased reported receipts with increased reported expenses, which do not face information reporting, diminishing the impact on reported net taxable income."
Does Credit-card Information Reporting Improve Small-business Tax Compliance? (2015)
[28] supported
Only a small subset of sole proprietorships receiving Form 1099-K were identified as affected by the form, at most 15 percent of them.
"The subset of firms we identify as being affected by 1099-K constitutes at most 15 percent of all sole proprietorships receiving 1099-K."
Does Credit-card Information Reporting Improve Small-business Tax Compliance? (2015)
[29] documented
The 2009 Dynamex filing says the company's classification of owner-operator drivers as independent contractors has been challenged by taxing authorities, including California's Employment Development Department, which assessed back taxes and interest.
"Our classification of our owner-operator drivers as independent contractors has been challenged from time to time by various taxing authorities, as in the case of California, where we have been subjected to assessments and interest for prior periods as a result of audits by the California Employment Development Department."
10-Q DYNAMEX INC (CIK 0001015483) 2009-12-10
[30] supported
The California Supreme Court's Dynamex decision set a new standard for deciding whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under California wage orders, a state classification rule that bears on platform driver status.
"the California Supreme Courts recent decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court, which established a new standard for determining employee or independent contractor status in the context of California wage orders"
FWP Uber Technologies, Inc (UBER) (CIK 0001543151) 2019-05-09
[31] supported
Updated Danish reporting rules under EU Directives DAC7 and DAC8 take effect from January 1, 2026.
"The new obligations will take effect from January 1, 2026."
Denmark Updates DAC7 and DAC8 Reporting Rules - Global VAT Compliance
[32] supported
In July 2008, two independent contractor drivers sued in San Bernardino County, California Superior Court, alleging the company's classification of California drivers as independent contractors was unlawful under California wage laws and constituted unfair competition.
"On July 25, 2008, two independent contractor drivers filed a purported class action suit in San Bernardino County, California Superior Court alleging that the Companys classification of California drivers as independent contractors was unlawful, and that as a consequence they were denied the benefit of various California wage laws."
10-Q DYNAMEX INC (CIK 0001015483) 2009-12-10
[33] supported
Uber agreed in March 2019 to pay $20 million to drivers in California and Massachusetts who had not signed arbitration agreements, settling claims that they were misclassified as independent contractors.
"pursuant to which we agreed to pay $20 million to Drivers who contracted with us in California and Massachusetts but with whom we have not entered into arbitration agreements"
FWP Uber Technologies, Inc (UBER) (CIK 0001543151) 2019-05-09
[34] supported
The company stated it believed its owner-operators were not employees under existing federal (U.S. and Canadian), state, and provincial laws, but acknowledged there was no certainty it would prevail against these challenges.
"While we believe that our owner-operators are not employees under existing interpretations of federal (U.S. and Canadian), state and provincial laws and intend to vigorously defend such challenges, there is no certainty that we will prevail."
10-Q DYNAMEX INC (CIK 0001015483) 2009-12-10