Do privacy rulings block off-hours worker tracking, citing the gig law or GDPR?
Research question: How have national data-protection authorities or courts interpreted the Platform Work Directive's ban on collecting worker data outside working time, and do those rulings cite the directive or rely on GDPR provisions instead?
The records show that national authorities responsible for data protection supervise the directive's algorithmic management rules where data-protection matters are concerned 1. The directive is described as supplementing the GDPR, with Article 7 extending the GDPR and the AI Regulation 4. The provided facts contain no national authority decision or court ruling on collecting worker data outside working time, so they cannot show whether such rulings cite the directive or rely on the GDPR 14. The newest dated source is from 2024-10-23, and the 2 December 2026 transposition deadline is still ahead of the current date of October 2026 25.
Sources
"National authorities responsible for data protection are to supervise and enforce rules on algorithmic management as far as data-protection matters are concerned, in coordination with other competent authorities."Working conditions in platform work
"The use of automated systems is likely to present high risks to individuals’ rights and requires a data protection impact assessment ."Working conditions in platform work
"Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of personal data and the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR))."Working conditions in platform work
"Mit Artikel 7 Plattformarbeit-RL werden die DSGVO und die KI-Verordnung ergänzt"EU-Plattformarbeitsrichtlinie 2024/2831: Schutz und ...
"Bis zum 2. Dezember 2026 müssen die Mitgliedstaaten die Bestimmungen der Plattformarbeit-"EU-Plattformarbeitsrichtlinie 2024/2831: Schutz und ...
Ask your own question