ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

What pay rules and dates has Lofter posted about AI content limits?

Research question: What creator-level payout or policy-effective-date disclosures has Lofter or a comparable Chinese blogging platform published around AI-content restrictions, and what dates do they state?

The records show LOFTER's official Weibo statements on March 6-7, 2023, saying the AI drawing training set came from open-source data rather than LOFTER user works, and promising 10,000 yuan per infringing image 2. LOFTER published an apology letter to creators on March 10, 2023, stating that the AI feature had been taken offline on March 8 and that a creator protection plan had been launched 3. That plan prohibits AI-generated content from being published as original works and strengthens AI content identification and feedback handling 5, and it set up a separate AI content section 4. The records show no platform-specific creator payout terms or revenue-sharing effective dates for AI-assisted content; a 2026 AIGC study says revenue sharing for such creation still needs clarifying 1. The only comparable disclosure found is Baidu's Wenxin Yige agreement, dated March 10, 2023, which covers image IP ownership rather than creator payouts, and it is not a blogging platform 8. The newest dated fact is from March 2023, more than three years before October 2026, so these disclosures may no longer reflect current policy.

Checked 2026-10-21. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
The document states that revenue sharing for AI-assisted creation still needs to be clarified, but it gives no platform-specific payout terms or effective dates.
"revenue sharing in AI‑assisted creation should be clarified."
AIGC Reshaping Social Media: Technological Convergence, Content Production, and Ethical Governance (2026)
[2] supported
LOFTER's official Weibo published statements on March 6-7 (2023) saying the AI drawing feature's training set came from open-source data and was not trained on LOFTER user works, and promising compensation of 10,000 yuan per infringing image.
"LOFTER官方微博在3月6日至7日连发两条声明,强调“该功能训练集来自于开源,没有使用LOFTER用户的作品数据,并明确注明不得用于商业用途”,并在声明中指出,如AI绘图功能生成的图片确有侵权,将“赔偿原作者一万元”。"
网易LOFTER上线AI绘图引发争议,平台内置生成式AI功能的合规边界何在?_腾讯新闻
[3] supported
LOFTER published an apology letter to creators on March 10, stating that the controversial AI feature had been taken offline on March 8 and that a creator protection plan had been launched.
"3月10日,LOFTER官方又发布“致广大创作者的一封道歉信”,称引发争议的相关功能已于3月8日下线,并上线了创作者保护计划,禁止AI内容作为原创作品发布,加强AI内容识别和反馈处理。"
走红的AI,走失的LOFTER|界面新闻 · JMedia
[4] supported
On March 10, 2023, LOFTER published an apology letter to creators announcing a 'Creator Protection Plan' and that it would prohibit AI content from being published as original works and create a separate AI content section.
"3月10日,LOFTER官方在APP内发布了《致广大创作者的一封道歉信》,称将推出“创作者保护计划”, 上线并不断完善反AI盗用、反恶意爬取的能力,同时将禁止AI内容作为原创作品发布,并建立AI内容单独分区,与原创作品进行区分。"
网易LOFTER上线AI绘图引发争议,平台内置生成式AI功能的合规边界何在?_腾讯新闻
[5] supported
Under the creator protection plan, LOFTER prohibits AI-generated content from being published as original works and strengthens AI content identification and feedback handling.
"并上线了创作者保护计划,禁止AI内容作为原创作品发布,加强AI内容识别和反馈处理。"
走红的AI,走失的LOFTER|界面新闻 · JMedia
[6] supported
Rather than removing the AI drawing feature, LOFTER planned to move the 'avatar generator' test entry to the avatar frame center, where generated images could only be used as platform avatars with no download or publishing function.
"LOFTER并未决定彻底下架该功能,而是计划将“头像生成器”功能测试入口调整到“头像框中心”,生成图片仅可作为平台头像使用,不提供下载和发布功能。"
网易LOFTER上线AI绘图引发争议,平台内置生成式AI功能的合规边界何在?_腾讯新闻
[7] supported
In the days after the backlash, LOFTER issued two successive statements saying the feature did not use creators' works as training data and that the data came from open source.
"于是在之后的几日内,LOFTER连发两条声明,强调该功能并未使用平台创作者的作品数据,相关数据来自于开源"
走红的AI,走失的LOFTER|界面新闻 · JMedia
[8] supported
Baidu's ERNIE-based 'Wenxin Yige' service agreement states that paying users own the intellectual property in images generated, which can be used commercially, and the platform claims no IP rights in them.
"如百度“文心一格”的服务协议中便指出,付费用户在合法合规情况下,使用该功能生成图像的知识产权及其上的相关权益将永久归用户所有,且可用于商业用途,平台不拥有该图像的知识产权及其上的相关权益且不对此承担任何责任。"
网易LOFTER上线AI绘图引发争议,平台内置生成式AI功能的合规边界何在?_腾讯新闻