ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: thin

Have real-data studies tested if royalties or ownership perks raise token prices?

Research question: Which peer-reviewed or working-paper studies test the Digital Ownership value mechanisms (retained value, provenance value, fractional membership, royalties) with empirical data on tokenized asset prices or fee revenue?

None of the verified facts reports an empirical test of retained value, provenance value, fractional membership, or royalties against tokenized asset prices or fee revenue. The records show only a single cited sale and a contractual royalty term, which are examples rather than tests 45. The closest empirical work is a panel regression of NFT prices on trading activity, which returned insignificant results for most collections and so could not reliably measure price impact 1. Collection age showed a strong positive relationship with NFT prices, but this does not address the four named mechanisms 3. The newest verified fact dates from 2021, about five years before October 2026, so the evidence is dated 6.

Checked 2026-10-14. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
A panel-data regression of NFT prices on trading activity produced insignificant results for most collections, so the study could not reliably measure the impact on price.
"However, a regression on panel data to measure the impact on the price, led to insignificant results for a majority of collections."
NFT Wash Trading: Quantifying suspicious behaviour in NFT markets
[2] supported
The Disaster Girl NFT sold for 180 Ether, about US$486,716, to a collector identified only as @3FMusic.
"On April 17, 2021, Roth sold the NFT for 180 Ether , or US$ 486,716 to a collector identified only as @3FMusic."
Disaster Girl
[3] supported
Across NFT collections, the age of a collection had a strong positive relationship with NFT prices, though the effect of gas prices was mixed.
"Lookingintoexternalfactors,wefoundthatage hasastrongpositive relationshipwiththeprice."
NFT Wash Trading: Quantifying suspicious behaviour in NFT markets
[4] supported
The survey cites Mad Dog Jones's REPLICATOR as selling for about 4.1 million USD. This is a single sales figure cited as an example, not an empirical test of provenance or retained value.
"Mad Dog Jones’s REPLICATOR (selling with"
Non-Fungible Token (NFT): Overview, Evaluation, Opportunities and Challenges
[5] supported
The Roth family kept copyright over the work and was entitled to 10 percent of proceeds whenever the NFT is resold.
"The Roth family retained copyright over the work, [ 1 ] as well as an entitlement to 10 percent of proceeds when the NFT is resold."
Disaster Girl
[6] supported
Kong and Lin (2021) used CryptoPunks data to build a hedonic regression model and identified rarity as a key determinant of the cross-sectional price premium for NFTs.
"built a hedonic regression model and highlighted rarity as a key determinant of price premium in the cross-section."
Deep Learning for Dynamic NFT Valuation