ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

Why did Paul and Christians quote 'Esau I hated,' and how was it read?

Research question: Why did Paul and later Christian writers cite the brothers, including the line 'Jacob I loved, Esau I hated,' and how was it read?

Paul quoted the Jacob and Esau line as written scripture to show that God's election rests on his calling, not on human works 145, and he answered the charge of injustice by denying that God is unjust 1312. Augustine read the same line as showing that God's choice was not based on foreseen works 19, that both twins were children of wrath through Adam rather than through their own deeds 21, and that boasting belongs only to grace 23. The Malachi source, by contrast, uses the contrast to answer Israel's doubt that God loves them 17, and Pucci later argued it referred to two nations rather than to the individual brothers 29. Lefèvre noted that the citation raises questions about free will, sovereignty, and predestination 25. The records do not fully explain Paul's own motives beyond his argument, so this answer is only partly supported. The newest fact is from 2026, the Lefèvre study 2526.

Checked 2026-10-21. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] documented
Paul introduces the line about Jacob and Esau as a quotation from scripture, presenting it as authoritative written text.
"As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated."
Romans 9:13-18 [King James Version]
[2] supported
Paul reads the Genesis patriarch stories as a pattern of chosen and rejected sons, which he uses to frame Israel's election in Romans 9.
"Hosea and Isaiah do not stand alone but extend and subvert the pattern of the chosen and rejected sons that Paul finds in Genesis."
Renaming Abraham's Children: Election, Ethnicity, and the Interpretation of Scripture in Romans 9 (2016)
[3] supported
Augustine's existing account of God's foreknowledge of human acts no longer explained why Esau and Jacob, as twins, had such different fates.
"The concept of God’s foreknowledge of human acts no longer sufficed to understand the diverse fates of the twins Esau and Jacob."
Augustine on Election: The Birth of an Article of Faith (2013)
[4] supported
Paul introduces the Jacob and Esau line as a written scripture that supports his argument that God's choice does not depend on human works.
"[13] ⸀καθὼς γέγραπται· Τὸν Ἰακὼβ ἠγάπησα, τὸν δὲ Ἠσαῦ ἐμίσησα."
Romans 9:13-18 [Greek New Testament (SBLGNT)]
[5] documented
Paul says the brothers were chosen before they were born or had done anything good or evil, so God's election rests on his calling and not on human works.
"For [the children] being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;"
Romans 9:13-18 [King James Version]
[6] supported
The election of the patriarchs in the Pentateuch is linked in Romans 9 to the prophetic quotations that vindicate God's inclusive call.
"The pentateuchal texts elucidating the election of the patriarchs (9:7, 9, 12) and the prophetic quotations vindicating God's inclusive call (9:25-29) are connected to each other by several links."
Renaming Abraham's Children: Election, Ethnicity, and the Interpretation of Scripture in Romans 9 (2016)
[7] supported
Augustine's Ad Simplicianum marked a major shift in his theology toward a fully developed doctrine of grace.
"Especially his Ad Simplicianum documents “a veritable revolution in his theology” towards a fully developed doctrine of grace."
Augustine on Election: The Birth of an Article of Faith (2013)
[8] documented
Paul ties the election of Jacob over Esau to God's purpose, stating it was decided before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad, and not by works but by God's calling.
"μήπω γὰρ γεννηθέντων μηδὲ πραξάντων τι ἀγαθὸν ἢ ⸀φαῦλον, ἵνα ἡ κατ’ ἐκλογὴν πρόθεσις τοῦ θεοῦ μένῃ, [12] οὐκ ἐξ ἔργων ἀλλ’ ἐκ τοῦ καλοῦντος"
Romans 9:13-18 [Greek New Testament (SBLGNT)]
[9] supported
Paul concludes that mercy depends on God's choice rather than on human willing or running, so the election is read as God's sovereign mercy.
"So then [it is] not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy."
Romans 9:13-18 [King James Version]
[10] supported
The dissertation argues that Paul reads Gentiles into Hosea by identifying them typologically with Abraham's excluded children.
"First, Paul reads Gentiles into Hosea by typologically identifying them with Abraham's excluded children."
Renaming Abraham's Children: Election, Ethnicity, and the Interpretation of Scripture in Romans 9 (2016)
[11] documented
Augustine's own study of Paul's Letter to the Romans and questions from Simplician of Milan led him to write on Romans chapter 9, the chapter that discusses Jacob and Esau.
"Personal explorations into St. Paul’s letter to the Romans and written questions from Simplician of Milan prompted him to write on Chapter 9."
Augustine on Election: The Birth of an Article of Faith (2013)
[12] documented
Paul answers the objection that the Jacob and Esau choice is unjust by denying that God is unjust and by pointing to God's words to Moses about mercy.
"[14] Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; μὴ ἀδικία παρὰ τῷ θεῷ; μὴ γένοιτο· [15] τῷ ⸂Μωϋσεῖ γὰρ⸃ λέγει· Ἐλεήσω ὃν ἂν ἐλεῶ, καὶ οἰκτιρήσω ὃν ἂν οἰκτίρω."
Romans 9:13-18 [Greek New Testament (SBLGNT)]
[13] documented
Paul anticipates the objection that God's choosing one brother over the other would be unjust, and rejects that conclusion.
"What shall we say then? [Is there] unrighteousness with God? God forbid."
Romans 9:13-18 [King James Version]
[14] supported
Through this reading of election, Paul can view Israel as both chosen and rejected by God.
"It enables Paul to view Israel as simultaneously chosen and rejected by God."
Renaming Abraham's Children: Election, Ethnicity, and the Interpretation of Scripture in Romans 9 (2016)
[15] supported
Paul concludes that election depends on God's mercy rather than on human will or effort, and that God hardens whom he wills.
"[16] ἄρα οὖν οὐ τοῦ θέλοντος οὐδὲ τοῦ τρέχοντος ἀλλὰ τοῦ ἐλεῶντος θεοῦ. [17] λέγει γὰρ ἡ γραφὴ τῷ Φαραὼ ὅτι Εἰς αὐτὸ τοῦτο ἐξήγειρά σε ὅπως ἐνδείξωμαι ἐν σοὶ τὴν δύναμίν μου, καὶ ὅπως διαγγελῇ τὸ ὄνομά μου ἐν πάσῃ τῇ γῇ. [18] ἄρα οὖν ὃν θέλει ἐλεεῖ, ὃν δὲ θέλει σκληρύνει."
Romans 9:13-18 [Greek New Testament (SBLGNT)]
[16] supported
Paul quoted the prophetic testimony 'Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated' in connection with the twins in Rebecca's womb, illustrating the grace of God.
"And when the apostle said this, he was illustrating the grace of God , in connection with which he had just spoken of the twins in the womb of Rebecca, who being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of Him that calls, it was said to her, The elder shall serve the younger. And in reference to this matter he q"
Handbook on Faith, Hope and Love (St. Augustine), part 161 [Church Fathers: Handbook on Faith, Hope and Love (St. Augustine)]
[17] documented
In Malachi, God uses the Jacob and Esau contrast to answer Israel's doubt that he loves them, presenting Jacob's election over Esau as the proof of that love.
"Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the Lord: yet I loved Jacob"
Malachi 1:1-6 [Septuagint (Brenton English, 1844)]
[18] supported
Paul develops the image of the potter and clay to argue that God has authority to make some vessels for honor and others for dishonor, which shapes how the Jacob and Esau passage was read.
"[21] ἢ οὐκ ἔχει ἐξουσίαν ὁ κεραμεὺς τοῦ πηλοῦ ἐκ τοῦ αὐτοῦ φυράματος ποιῆσαι ὃ μὲν εἰς τιμὴν σκεῦος ὃ δὲ εἰς ἀτιμίαν;"
Romans 9:13-18 [Greek New Testament (SBLGNT)]
[19] documented
The line was read as showing that God's choice was not based on foreseen works, since if Paul had meant future good or evil works, he would have said 'of future works' rather than 'not of works'.
"Now, if the apostle had wished us to understand that there were future good works of the one, and evil works of the other, which of course God foreknew, he would never have said, not of works, but, of future works, and in that way would have solved the difficulty"
Handbook on Faith, Hope and Love (St. Augustine), part 161 [Church Fathers: Handbook on Faith, Hope and Love (St. Augustine)]
[20] supported
The 'hatred' of Esau is made concrete in the text: God says he laid waste Esau's borders and turned his heritage into wilderness dwellings.
"and hated Esau, and laid waste his borders, and made his heritage as dwellings of the wilderness?"
Malachi 1:1-6 [Septuagint (Brenton English, 1844)]
[21] supported
The passage was read as teaching that both twins were born children of wrath because of the original condemnation through Adam, not because of their own works.
"Thus both the twins were born children of wrath , not on account of any works of their own, but because they were bound in the fetters of that original condemnation which came through Adam."
Handbook on Faith, Hope and Love (St. Augustine), part 161 [Church Fathers: Handbook on Faith, Hope and Love (St. Augustine)]
[22] supported
Malachi says Edom's attempts to rebuild after its overthrow will fail, and its land will be called 'The borders of wickedness' and a people under the Lord's perpetual judgment.
"they shall be called The borders of wickedness, and, The people against whom the Lord has set himself for ever."
Malachi 1:1-6 [Septuagint (Brenton English, 1844)]
[23] supported
Jacob was loved out of undeserved grace while Esau was hated out of deserved judgment, so the lesson was that boasting belongs only to God's grace.
"But He who said, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, loved Jacob of His undeserved grace , and hated Esau of His deserved judgment."
Handbook on Faith, Hope and Love (St. Augustine), part 161 [Church Fathers: Handbook on Faith, Hope and Love (St. Augustine)]
[24] supported
The Hebrew text of Malachi 1:2-3 has God state that he loved Jacob and that Esau, Jacob's brother, was the one he hated; the document does not mention Paul or later Christian interpretation.
"הֲלוֹא־אָ֨ח עֵשָׂ֤ו לְיַֽעֲקֹב֙ נְאֻם־יְהֹוָ֔ה וָאֹהַ֖ב אֶֽת־יַעֲקֹֽב׃"
Malachi 1:1-6 [Hebrew Bible (Masoretic text, Sefaria)]
[25] supported
Lefèvre noted that Romans 9 raises questions about free will, God's sovereignty, predestination, and foreknowledge, largely because Paul cites Malachi 1 with the words 'Jacob I have loved, Esau I have hated.'
"due to its citation of Malachi 1 (“Jacob I have loved, Esau I have hated”88), as well as its references to Pharaoh."
The soteriology of Jacques Lefèvre d'Étaples and its influence on the early Protestant Reformers (2026)
[26] supported
In Lefèvre's reading, God's choice of Jacob rests solely on divine mercy, and the rejection of Esau rests solely on divine justice.
"The choice of love for Jacob is solely based upon divine mercy, while the choice to hate Esau is solely based upon divine justice."
The soteriology of Jacques Lefèvre d'Étaples and its influence on the early Protestant Reformers (2026)
[27] supported
Lefèvre's treatment of Romans 9:6 and following begins by reviewing the history of the patriarchs leading up to Jacob and Esau, including God's promises to Abraham, Sarah, Isaac and Rebecca.
"As he moves to discuss Romans 9:6 and following, Lefèvre discusses the history of the patriarchs leading up to Jacob and Esau."
The soteriology of Jacques Lefèvre d'Étaples and its influence on the early Protestant Reformers (2026)
[28] documented
Pucci argued that the Romans 9 passage on Esau and Jacob had been used as a secure foundation for the doctrine that God hated Esau ab aeterno, from before birth and before he could sin.
"This passage, Pucci rightly noted, had been used as a “secure foundation to prove this hatred of God ab aeterno.”"
Concord and Toleration in the Thought of Francesco Pucci, 1578–81 (2015)
[29] documented
Pucci read the Malachi line 'Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated' as referring to the two nations (Edomites and Israelites), not to the individual brothers.
"Expounding the text’s meaning, he argued that once again it did not refer to individual brothers, but “without doubt it speaks of the two nations.”"
Concord and Toleration in the Thought of Francesco Pucci, 1578–81 (2015)
[30] supported
Pucci identified two errors by earlier exegetes: confusing the individual brothers with the tribes they founded, and reading the Genesis passage in light of the later Malachi passage, projecting Malachi's hatred back onto Genesis.
"First, they confused the individual brothers with the tribes that they had respectively founded."
Concord and Toleration in the Thought of Francesco Pucci, 1578–81 (2015)
[31] supported
The source is a 2010 study of Romans 9–11 that begins with an overview of substitution theology (the view that the church replaces Israel) in history and the present, before arguing for Israel's enduring election. It does not address the Jacob and Esau passage directly.
"Nach einer Übersicht über die Substitutionstheorie in Geschichte und Gegenwart wird die bleibende Erwählung Israels nach Röm 9-11 exegetisch begründet."
3. Israels bleibende Erwählung nach Römer 9–11 31