ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

Did the government change job rules to make firing easier, and who sued?

Research question: Has the federal government reclassified civil service positions to make them easier to fire, and what legal challenges followed?

Yes, according to the records, the administration moved close to 8,000 career federal positions into Schedule Policy/Career, a category with limited job protections 4. Employees in that category lose civil service protections, so agencies can discipline or fire them more easily, and they cannot appeal adverse actions to the Merit Systems Protection Board 5. Plaintiffs argue the category violates due process, exceeds presidential authority, and contradicts federal statute 7, and unions accuse the administration of violating the Constitution, the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act, and the Administrative Procedures Act 24. The newest relevant fact is dated June 2026, about four months before October 2026, and none of the verified facts report a court ruling on these challenges 4724.

Checked 2026-10-23. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] documented
Employees appointed to Schedule Policy/Career positions under the new section acquire competitive status only after one year of continuous service in the position.
"Individuals appointed to a position under 5 CFR 213.3501 acquire competitive status after completing one year of continuous service in the position."
Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil Service (Personnel Management Office, 2025-04-23)
[2] supported
Schedule Policy/Career lets agencies move certain career civil service positions into a category that can be removed at will, without the notice, cause, and appeal protections that normally apply to career employees.
"Schedule Policy/Career allows agencies to move certain career civil service positions into a category that can be removed at will—without the notice, cause, and appeal protections that typically apply to career employees."
Lawsuit Challenges Schedule Policy/Career Rule
[3] documented
OPM stated that Executive Order 14171 and the final rule reject the claim that Schedule Policy/Career will politicize the federal service or cause high turnover.
"flatly reject the notion that Schedule Policy/Career will politicize the Federal service or lead to high turnover."
Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil Service (Personnel Management Office, 2026-02-06)
[4] supported
The Trump administration moved close to 8,000 career federal positions into a new employment category, Schedule Policy/Career, with limited job protections.
"Close to 8,000 career federal employees will be moved into a new employment category with limited job protections"
Trump moves about 8,000 federal positions to Schedule Policy/Career - Federal News Network
[5] supported
Employees moved into Schedule Policy/Career lose civil service protections, making it easier for agencies to discipline or fire them, and they cannot appeal adverse actions to the Merit Systems Protection Board.
"Schedule Policy/Career will make it easier for agencies to discipline or fire affected employees for any reason, with no opportunity for employees to appeal adverse actions to the Merit Systems Protection Board."
Trump moves about 8,000 federal positions to Schedule Policy/Career - Federal News Network
[6] supported
The plaintiffs argue the statutory phrase covering confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating roles has historically described political appointees, especially Schedule C positions, not career employees hired competitively.
"Historically, that language has been used to describe political appointees—particularly Schedule C positions—rather than career employees who entered government service through competitive hiring."
Lawsuit Challenges Schedule Policy/Career Rule
[7] supported
The administration faces a lawsuit over its effort to remove civil service protections, with plaintiffs arguing the category violates due process, exceeds presidential authority, and contradicts federal statute.
"The Trump administration is facing a lawsuit against its efforts to remove civil service protections from a swath of career federal employees. Plaintiffs allege that the creation of Schedule Policy/Career violates due process rights, exceeds presidential authority and contradicts federal statute."
Trump moves about 8,000 federal positions to Schedule Policy/Career - Federal News Network
[8] supported
The new classification could potentially reach tens of thousands of career civil servants whose jobs involve policy work but who were hired under merit system rules.
"the new classification could potentially reach tens of thousands of career civil servants whose jobs involve policy work but who were hired under merit system rules."
Lawsuit Challenges Schedule Policy/Career Rule
[9] supported
OPM's proposed regulations on Schedule Policy/Career drew over 40,000 public comments in April 2025, with about 94% of commenters opposed.
"In April 2025, OPM’s proposed regulations on Schedule Policy/Career received over 40,000 public comments, with about 94% of commenters opposed to the regulation."
Trump moves about 8,000 federal positions to Schedule Policy/Career - Federal News Network
[10] supported
The complaint argues OPM justified the rule by citing agencies' difficulty disciplining poor performers, yet the rule turns on the type of work performed rather than employee performance.
"The plaintiffs argue that OPM justified the rule by asserting that agencies struggle to discipline poor performers. Yet the rule itself does not turn on employee performance—it turns on the type of work performed."
Lawsuit Challenges Schedule Policy/Career Rule
[11] supported
The source only shows an email subject referencing an OPM memo on an executive order that excepts Administrative Law Judges from the competitive service; it does not say why, or discuss firing or legal challenges.
"[EXTERNAL] OPM Memo\_ Executive Order – Excepting Administrative Law Judges from the Competitive Service..."
VAExecSec@va.gov Emails • MuckRock
[12] supported
The Trump administration issued a final rule implementing Schedule Policy/Career, one of the last required steps before agencies convert career employees in policy-influencing positions, removing their civil service protections and making them easier to fire.
"The regulations were one of the last required steps before agencies begin converting career federal employees in “policy-influencing” positions to the new employment classification, in effect removing their civil service protections and make them easier to fire."
Federal employees put into revived ‘Schedule F’ category may lose loan aid, pay incentives
[13] supported
President Trump signed an executive order converting nearly 10,000 career federal workers into Schedule Policy/Career, making them effectively at-will employees.
"President Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order formally converting nearly 10,000 career federal workers into Schedule Policy/Career, making them effectively at-will employees."
Trump signs order moving thousands of federal employees into Schedule F - Government Executive
[14] supported
A June 3, 2026 Executive Order reclassifies thousands of senior policy-influencing career civil service roles, mostly at GS-15 and senior levels, into a new excepted-service category with fewer civil service protections.
"The Executive Order reclassifies thousands of senior “policy-influencing” career civil service roles — primarily at the GS‑15 and senior levels — into a new excepted-service category that significantly reduces traditional civil service protections."
Thousands of Federal Employees Could Be Bracing for Changes in Classification
[15] supported
Schedule Policy/Career (formerly Schedule F) is meant to increase the president's control over the career civil service by stripping civil service protections and making employees easier to dismiss.
"The purpose of the provision is to increase the president's control over the federal career civil service by removing their civil service protections and making them easier to dismiss, which proponents stated would increase flexibility and accountability to elected officials."
Schedule F appointment
[16] supported
Once finalized, agencies will be able to suspend, demote or fire Schedule Policy/Career employees without standard adverse action procedures, and these employees cannot appeal adverse actions or their reclassification.
"Once finalized, agencies will be able to suspend, demote or fire any Schedule Policy/Career employee without going through standard adverse action procedures."
Federal employees put into revived ‘Schedule F’ category may lose loan aid, pay incentives
[17] supported
Employees placed into the new schedule can no longer challenge adverse personnel actions before the Merit Systems Protection Board, and whistleblower complaints would be investigated by their own agency rather than the Office of Special Counsel.
"Employees placed into the new schedule would no longer be able to challenge adverse personnel actions before the Merit Systems Protection Board, and whistleblower complaints filed by Schedule F employees would be investigated by their own agency, rather than the Office of Special Counsel."
Trump signs order moving thousands of federal employees into Schedule F - Government Executive
[18] supported
Employees moved into Schedule Policy/Career become at-will employees who can be fired more easily, with traditional due-process protections reduced or removed and faster disciplinary action.
"Reclassified employees placed into Schedule Policy/Career will become “at‑will” employees, generally meaning that they can be fired more easily, have their traditional due‑process protections reduced or removed and their agencies can take faster disciplinary action."
Thousands of Federal Employees Could Be Bracing for Changes in Classification
[19] supported
The original Schedule F classification existed briefly during 2020 and 2021 but was never fully implemented and no one was appointed to it before it was repealed at the start of the Biden administration.
"The classification, then known as Schedule F, existed briefly at the end of the first Trump administration during 2020 and 2021, but was never fully implemented and no one was appointed to it before it was repealed at the beginning of the Biden administration ."
Schedule F appointment
[20] supported
The American Federation of Government Employees, with other federal unions, is expected to file a lawsuit challenging the Schedule Policy/Career final rule, following an earlier lawsuit against Trump's day-one executive order creating the schedule.
"The American Federation of Government Employees, in partnership with other federal unions and employee organizations, is expected to soon file a lawsuit challenging the Schedule Policy/Career final rule. It follows an initial lawsuit against Trump’s day-one executive order calling for the creation of Schedule Policy/Career."
Federal employees put into revived ‘Schedule F’ category may lose loan aid, pay incentives
[21] supported
The administration narrowed its target from an earlier estimate of 50,000 federal employees to about 8,000 jobs, with around 97% being GS-15s or senior leaders.
"contrary to the administration’s prior estimates that 50,000 feds would be converted to the new job category, just 8,000 jobs are targeted in Wednesday’s executive order."
Trump signs order moving thousands of federal employees into Schedule F - Government Executive
[22] supported
The classification was reinstated as Schedule Policy/Career at the start of the second Trump administration, and an updated rule allowing reclassifications was issued in February 2026.
"It was reinstated as Schedule Policy/Career at the beginning of the second Trump administration in 2025, and an updated rule allowing reclassifications was issued in February 2026."
Schedule F appointment
[23] supported
AFGE National President Everett Kelley said the rule turns tens or maybe hundreds of thousands of professionals into at-will employees, making government more vulnerable to pressure, retaliation and political interference.
"Turning tens or maybe hundreds of thousands of these professionals into at-will employees doesn’t make government more accountable. It makes it more vulnerable to pressure, retaliation and political interference"
Federal employees put into revived ‘Schedule F’ category may lose loan aid, pay incentives
[24] supported
The policy remains the subject of multiple lawsuits by federal employee unions, who accuse the administration of violating the Constitution, the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act, and the Administrative Procedures Act.
"The policy remains the subject of multiple lawsuits by federal employee unions, who have accused the administration of violating the Constitution, the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act and the Administrative Procedures Act."
Trump signs order moving thousands of federal employees into Schedule F - Government Executive
[25] supported
Schedule Policy/Career positions will for the most part no longer be eligible for student loan repayment options or recruitment, retention or relocation incentives.
"Schedule Policy/Career positions will, for the most part, no longer be eligible for student loan repayment options, nor will they be able to receive recruitment, retention or relocation incentives."
Federal employees put into revived ‘Schedule F’ category may lose loan aid, pay incentives
[26] supported
OPM's final rule implementing the new job category took effect in March, after OPM followed the notice-and-comment process to propose regulations unwinding Biden-era protections.
"OPM’s final rule implementing the new job category took effect in March."
Trump signs order moving thousands of federal employees into Schedule F - Government Executive
[27] supported
OPM stated that agencies are prohibited from requiring Schedule Policy/Career employees to pledge personal or political loyalty to the President or his policies.
"OPM, however, has stated that agencies are prohibited from requiring Schedule Policy/Career employees to pledge personal or political loyalty to the President or his policies"
Thousands of Federal Employees Could Be Bracing for Changes in Classification
[28] supported
The document does not say the government reclassified civil service positions to make them easier to fire. It describes Schedule C appointments, which were created in 1956 as part of the excepted service.
"Schedule C appointments were created in 1956 and are part of the excepted service"
Schedule C appointment
[29] supported
Career positions are described as more secure than Schedule C appointments because they do not end when a presidential administration changes, which is why employees want to convert to them.
"career positions do not end when a presidential administration changes"
Schedule C appointment
[30] supported
In July 2008, members of Congress criticized the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice for improperly letting political employees convert to career positions.
"In July 2008, members of Congress criticized the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice for improperly allowing political employees to convert to career positions"
Schedule C appointment
[31] supported
Officials estimated that about 50,000 federal workers would lose their civil service protections starting roughly a month after the February 2026 article.
"Officials estimate that around 50,000 federal workers will be stripped of their civil service protections beginning in around a month, as unions, employee associations and good government groups decry their positions’ politicization."
Trump admin moves to finalize return of Schedule F - Government Executive
[32] supported
Trump fired one-third of the members of the federal employee appeals board (the Merit Systems Protection Board) in February 2025.
"Trump fires one-third of federal employee appeals board"
Domestic policy of the second Trump administration
[33] supported
Schedule F, revived in 2025 and renamed Schedule Policy/Career, is a new job classification within the excepted service for 'policy-related' positions.
"First developed during Trump’s first term and revived last year, Schedule F—now renamed Schedule Policy/Career—is a new job classification within the government’s excepted service for “policy-related” positions."
Trump admin moves to finalize return of Schedule F - Government Executive
[34] supported
President Biden rescinded Schedule F as soon as he took office.
"It was rescinded by President Biden as soon as he took office in January 2021."
The Schedule F Threat to Democracy: A Project 2025 Explainer - Kettering Foundation
[35] supported
The American Federation of Government Employees' national president promised an 'imminent' court challenge to the rule, coordinated with other employee groups.
"And Everett Kelley, national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, promised an “imminent” court challenge to the rule, in coordination with other employee groups."
Trump admin moves to finalize return of Schedule F - Government Executive
[36] supported
A Merit Systems Board member sued Trump over her firing, challenging the removal in court.
"Merit Systems Board Member Harris Sues Trump Over Firing (2)"
Domestic policy of the second Trump administration
[37] supported
Of more than 40,000 public comments on the proposed rule, 94% opposed the policy.
"Fully 94% of the more than 40,000 comments submitted on the proposed rule were opposed to the policy."
Trump admin moves to finalize return of Schedule F - Government Executive
[38] supported
A federal judge ruled that Trump's firing of the merit board chair was illegal.
"Federal judge rules Trump's firing of merit board chair was illegal"
Domestic policy of the second Trump administration
[39] supported
The Partnership for Public Service warned the new designation could be used to remove expert career employees and replace them with political supporters.
"“This new designation can be used to remove expert career federal employees who place the law and service to the public ahead of blind loyalty and replace them with political supporters who will unquestioningly do the president’s bidding.”"
Trump admin moves to finalize return of Schedule F - Government Executive
[40] supported
A federal judge ordered thousands of federal workers reinstated and criticized the government's declaration as a 'sham.'
"Judge orders thousands of federal workers reinstated; slams 'sham' government declaration"
Domestic policy of the second Trump administration