ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

How much of the Education Department shrinking plan happened, and what got blocked?

Research question: How much of the plan to dismantle or shrink the Education Department has been put into effect, and what has been blocked?

The records show that a significant part of the downsizing has gone ahead: the Supreme Court allowed the administration to proceed with layoffs of roughly 1,400 employees, which lifted the injunction that had blocked the first steps 127, and the cuts affected about one-third of the workforce 5. The Office for Civil Rights moved to lay off nearly half its staff and closed 7 of its 12 regional offices 30, and on June 16, 2026 the department announced it would transfer civil rights investigation and enforcement to the Justice Department 32. Moves of the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education to the Labor Department and Indian Education to the Interior Department were announced in November 2025 8. Some limits remain: the omnibus appropriations law bars transferring funds to other agencies, which would seem to block the offloading effort 10, and it bans funds for reorganizations that reduce staffing 11. The newest fact is a Treasury proposal dated October 7, 2026 4, but the records do not give a complete tally of how much of the plan has been carried out.

Checked 2026-10-22. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to proceed with layoffs of roughly 1,400 Education Department employees, removing the barrier that had blocked its first steps toward dismantling the department.
"granted a request by the Trump administration to allow the U.S. Department of Education to proceed with layoffs of roughly 1,400 employees."
Trump Admin. Can Proceed With Ed. Dept. Layoffs, Supreme Court Rules
[2] supported
The Supreme Court's order is not a final ruling on the merits, but it removes the injunction that had blocked the first steps toward dismantling the department.
"The court’s order in McMahon v. New York is not a final ruling on the merits, but it removes a barrier that had blocked the administration from taking its first steps toward dismantling the department."
Trump Admin. Can Proceed With Ed. Dept. Layoffs, Supreme Court Rules
[3] supported
A March 2025 executive order signed by Trump directed Education Secretary Linda McMahon to take steps to close the Department of Education and return its functions to the states.
"That effort seemingly culminated with a March 2025 executive order signed by Trump that ordered Education Secretary Linda McMahon to take steps to close the department and return its functions to the states."
So much for abolishing the Department of Education
[4] documented
Treasury proposed a new system of records to oversee federal student aid portfolio activities that are performed in coordination with the Department of Education under an interagency agreement.
"The purpose of this system of records is to allow the Office of the Fiscal Assistant Secretary and the Office of Economic Policy to receive and maintain records necessary to administer, oversee, monitor, report on, and ensure compliance with Treasury responsibilities associated with Treasury's oversight and management of federal student aid portfolio activities performed in coordination with the U"
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records (Treasury Department, 2026-10-07)
[5] supported
The layoffs affected about one-third of the department's workforce, excluding 578 workers who accepted voluntary departure offers.
"the affected employees, who constitute about one-third of the department’s workforce, excluding 578 workers who accepted voluntary departure offers from the Trump administration."
Trump Admin. Can Proceed With Ed. Dept. Layoffs, Supreme Court Rules
[6] supported
Despite the plan to close the department, the omnibus appropriations bill Trump signed directs $79 billion to the Department of Education, about $200 million more than fiscal year 2025 and $12 billion more than the administration requested.
"The omnibus appropriations bill that Trump signed on Tuesday to fund the federal government for the rest of the fiscal year directs $79 billion in taxpayer money to the Department of Education. That's a larger budget (by about $200 million) than the department had in fiscal year 2025, and it is $12 billion more than the Trump administration requested in its budget proposal for the year."
So much for abolishing the Department of Education
[7] supported
A federal district judge in Massachusetts had blocked the layoffs with a preliminary injunction, ruling that the administration was effectively disabling the department from carrying out its statutory duties.
"ruled on May 22 that the challengers would likely succeed in court in showing that the Trump administration is “effectively disabling the department from carrying out its statutory duties by firing half of its staff, transferring key programs out of the department, and eliminating entire offices and programs.”"
Trump Admin. Can Proceed With Ed. Dept. Layoffs, Supreme Court Rules
[8] supported
In November, McMahon announced that the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education would move to the Labor Department and the Indian Education Program would move to the Department of the Interior.
"In November, McMahon announced that the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education would be shifted to the Labor Department and the Indian Education Program would be moved to the Department of the Interior, among other things ."
So much for abolishing the Department of Education
[9] supported
Justice Sotomayor's dissent said the layoffs closed the Office of English Language Acquisition and closed seven of the 12 regional offices of the Office for Civil Rights.
"citing the dismantling of the entire Office of English Language Acquisition, the layoffs of Office of General Counsel workers who dealt with K-12 and special education matters, and the closure of seven of the 12 regional offices of the Office for Civil Rights."
Trump Admin. Can Proceed With Ed. Dept. Layoffs, Supreme Court Rules
[10] supported
The appropriations law bars the use of its funds to transfer money to any other department, agency, or instrumentality, which would seem to block the administration's efforts to offload Education Department programs to other parts of government.
"none of the funds made available in this Act may be transferred to any department, agency, or instrumentality"
So much for abolishing the Department of Education
[11] supported
The bill includes language prohibiting parts of the Education Department from being downsized or decentralized, including a ban on using funds for reorganizations that reduce staffing or alter the budget office's functions.
"The bill Trump signed also includes language that prohibits parts of the department from being downsized or decentralized."
So much for abolishing the Department of Education
[12] supported
President Trump issued an executive order on March 20, 2025, directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to take steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education.
"President Donald Trump issued an executive order on March 20, 2025, that calls for closing the U.S. Department of Education . The order, however, directs Education Secretary Linda McMahon to “take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education and return authority over education to the States and local communities while ensuring the effective and uninterrupted deliver"
The Heritage Foundation's Long War Against the Education Department
[13] supported
President Ronald Reagan previously attempted to abolish the Department of Education in 1983 but was unsuccessful.
"Nevertheless, President Ronald Reagan tried unsuccessfully to abolish the Department of Education in 1983 ."
The Heritage Foundation's Long War Against the Education Department
[14] supported
An analysis found that nearly one-third of the higher education policy recommendations in Project 2025 had been fully or partially executed just three months into the second Trump term.
"An Inside Higher Ed analysis conducted just three months into Trump 2.0 showed that nearly one-third of the 50 or so higher ed policy recommendations laid out in Project 2025 had been fully or partially executed."
New Heritage Report Shows Tension in Federal Role in Higher Ed
[15] supported
The Trump administration downsized the Education Department through reductions in force and reformed federal student aid via the One Big Beautiful Bill and rulemaking sessions.
"Congress and the department reformed federal student aid through the One Big Beautiful Bill and rulemaking sessions, and Trump downsized the Education Department through reductions in force."
New Heritage Report Shows Tension in Federal Role in Higher Ed
[16] supported
Attempts to cut research funding through grant freezes and budget proposals have faced pushback in court and on Capitol Hill.
"The president also sought to cut research funding through grant freezes and budget proposals, though some of those attempts have faced pushback in court and on Capitol Hill ."
New Heritage Report Shows Tension in Federal Role in Higher Ed
[17] supported
The Heritage Foundation considers the full dismantling of the Education Department and return of power to states as 'politically infeasible' at the current time.
"Plan A is to return education to the states, dismantle the department, privatize everything, or at least have block grants. But that’s politically infeasible today, so while we’re waiting for plan A to happen, we’re not against Plan B, which is to use the tools available to us."
New Heritage Report Shows Tension in Federal Role in Higher Ed
[18] supported
The Trump administration previously cracked down on DEI practices, deported international students, and gutted the Education Department's staff as part of its initial actions.
"the far more detailed governing blueprint that the Trump administration adopted when it cracked down on DEI practices , deported international students and gutted the department’s staff ."
New Heritage Report Shows Tension in Federal Role in Higher Ed
[19] supported
The Trump administration terminated nearly 1,300 Department of Education employees in March 2025, reducing the agency's workforce by almost half.
"In March, the administration terminated nearly 1,300 Department of Education employees—almost half the agency’s workforce."
Supreme Court Greenlights Project 2025 Plan to Dismantle Education Department
[20] supported
In June 2025, the administration froze $6 billion in federal education funding, impacting programs such as after-school activities and teacher training.
"In June, $6 billion in federal education funding was frozen, affecting after-school programs, English language instruction, and teacher training."
Supreme Court Greenlights Project 2025 Plan to Dismantle Education Department
[21] supported
The Heritage Foundation's 2026 goals include the ultimate elimination of the U.S. Department of Education.
"That means, of course, seeking to “expand education choice while working to limit federal intervention in education, with the goal of ultimately eliminating the U.S. Department of Education.”"
Heritage Foundation sets 9 goals to reinforce Project 2025
[22] supported
The Heritage Foundation states it is focused on loosening Washington's grip on K-12 and higher education to safeguard parental authority.
"Heritage is focused on loosening Washington’s grip on K-12 and higher education. Heritage will work to safeguard parental authority over their children’s education, expand universal education choice, protect American taxpayers from bailouts of an academia wholly adrift, and reclaim institutions of higher education from the radical Left."
Heritage Foundation sets 9 goals to reinforce Project 2025
[23] supported
The Heritage Foundation describes the current education system as failing due to 'woke ideas' like Critical Race Theory and a lack of academic excellence.
"“The education system is failing our children — from the scourge of woke ideas like Critical Race Theory and radical gender ideology to the lack of academic excellence and transparency,” it declares."
Heritage Foundation sets 9 goals to reinforce Project 2025
[24] supported
Since Donald Trump's reelection in November 2024, at least three states have proposed actions to limit undocumented students' access to free public education, while similar efforts in four other states have failed.
"Since Trump’s reelection win in November 2024, at least three states have proposed action to limit undocumented students’ access to a free, public education, while similar efforts in four other states have failed, according to an Education Week analysis."
Heritage Foundation Targets Undocumented Students’ Access to Free Education
[25] supported
Ohio, New Jersey, and Tennessee have proposed actions to require schools to collect immigration-related information or charge tuition to undocumented families, but none of these actions have taken effect.
"Ohio, New Jersey, and Tennessee have recently proposed actions that would require schools to collect immigration-related information or charge tuition to undocumented families. None has taken effec...t, and no state has successfully challenged Plyler ’s legal precedent in its more than 40-year history."
Heritage Foundation Targets Undocumented Students’ Access to Free Education
[26] supported
State laws in California and Alabama that challenged the Plyler v. Doe precedent in 1994 and 2011, respectively, were struck down by courts before they could be implemented.
"State laws challenging Plyler in California and Alabama in 1994 and 2011, respectively, were struck down before implementation, said Thomas A. Saenz, the president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, or MALDEF, which litigated the original Plyler v. Doe case."
Heritage Foundation Targets Undocumented Students’ Access to Free Education
[27] supported
The Heritage Foundation published a policy document on February 17, 2026, calling on states to enact laws restricting free public education for undocumented students and urging the Supreme Court to overturn the Plyler v. Doe decision.
"That ruling remains binding federal law , even as the Heritage Foundation, the conservative think tank behind the Project 2025 policy playbook shaping much of President Donald Trump’s agenda, published a policy document on Feb. 17 calling on states to intentionally enact laws or rules restricting free public education for undocumented students and calling on the highest court to overturn the landm"
Heritage Foundation Targets Undocumented Students’ Access to Free Education
[28] supported
Since Trump's reelection, at least two states have enacted protections for undocumented students' access to free public education, and at least one state is currently proposing to protect that right.
"Additionally, an EdWeek analysis has found that since Trump’s reelection, at least two states have enacted protections of undocumented students’ access to a free, public education, and at least one state is currently proposing to protect that right."
Heritage Foundation Targets Undocumented Students’ Access to Free Education
[29] supported
Republican-led states have sued to block the Biden administration's Title IX rules that expand protections for LGBTQ students.
"More recently, the Biden administration issued Title IX rules that provide greater and more explicit protections for LGBTQ students — rules that Republican-led states have sued to block ."
Abolishing the Department of Education: Why Trump and Project 2025 want it - Chalkbeat
[30] supported
The Education Department's Office of Civil Rights moved to lay off nearly half its staff in one day and closed 7 of its 12 regional offices.
"the Education Department’s Office of Civil Rights, which moved to lay off nearly half its staff in one day and closed 7 of its 12 regional offices"
US : Federal Agencies Abandon Civil Rights Duties (hrw.org, 2026-08)
[31] supported
Despite multiple Republican administrations, including Trump's first term, the U.S. Department of Education has not been abolished.
"Yet through multiple Republican administrations, including Trump’s first term, the U.S. Department of Education has persisted."
Abolishing the Department of Education: Why Trump and Project 2025 want it - Chalkbeat
[32] supported
On June 16, 2026, the Education Department announced it would transfer civil rights investigation and enforcement functions to the Justice Department.
"As recently as June 16, 2026, the Education Department announced it would transfer civil rights investigation and enforcement functions to the Justice Department, continuing the agency’s evisceration."
US : Federal Agencies Abandon Civil Rights Duties (hrw.org, 2026-08)
[33] supported
Heritage Foundation's Lindsey Burke acknowledged the political difficulty of simply abolishing the Education Department.
"On a podcast earlier this year, Lindsey Burke, the Heritage Foundation’s director of the Center for Education Policy and author of Project 2025’s education chapter, acknowledged the political difficulty of simply abolishing the department."
Abolishing the Department of Education: Why Trump and Project 2025 want it - Chalkbeat
[34] supported
The Education Department reportedly ceased monitoring complaints of discrimination against transgender students and enforcing protections for them.
"The department also reportedly ceased monitoring complaints of discrimination against or enforcing protections for transgender students ."
US : Federal Agencies Abandon Civil Rights Duties (hrw.org, 2026-08)
[35] supported
Burke said the executive branch could act on its own by ending student loan forgiveness programs and not enforcing the new Title IX rules, rather than abolishing the department outright.
"But she said the executive branch could take certain actions on its own, such as ending student loan forgiveness programs and not enforcing the new Title IX rules."
Abolishing the Department of Education: Why Trump and Project 2025 want it - Chalkbeat
[36] supported
During Trump's first term, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos rescinded Obama-era rules on suspensions and expulsions of Black students, and the Biden administration has not reinstated them.
"Betsy DeVos, Trump’s education secretary, rescinded those rules . (The Biden administration has not reinstated them.)"
Abolishing the Department of Education: Why Trump and Project 2025 want it - Chalkbeat