ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

Why was 1960's Psycho a turning point, and what did critics think?

Research question: Why did Psycho in 1960 mark a turning point, and what did audiences and critics say when it opened?

The sources call Psycho a turning point mainly because it is treated as a prototype of the slasher/serial killer subgenre 6 and as the starting point of the slasher genre 19, though the records do not spell out the specific turning point 3. Audiences turned out in large numbers: critics were denied press screenings and had to wait in long lines with paying viewers while the two opening theaters sold out nonstop 9, and latecomers were not admitted once the film began 17. The sources conflict on box office records, with one saying it did not set them 1 and another saying it broke them in several countries 2. At opening, critics were mixed to hostile 18; some gave less-than-stellar reviews, possibly because Hitchcock had kept the film from them beforehand 14, and a London critic called it more miserable than the most miserable peep show he had ever seen 27. Retrospective reviews are far more positive, with Metacritic giving it a score of 97 from 18 critics 8.

Checked 2026-10-21. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
Psycho was Hitchcock's biggest hit, with an adjusted gross of $400 million, but it did not set box office records.
"Although Alfred Hitchcock ‘s “ Psycho ” was the biggest hit of his career with an adjusted gross of $400 million, it didn’t set records."
Psycho Turns 60 This Week: How the 1960 Release Created an Iconic Film
[2] supported
Psycho broke box-office records in several countries, including Japan, the rest of Asia, France, Britain, South America, the United States, and Canada.
"Psycho broke box-office records in Japan and the rest of Asia, France, Britain, South America, the United States, and Canada, and was a moderate success in Australia for a brief period."
Psycho (1960 film)
[3] supported
The source describes Psycho (1960) as a seminal film that helped shape the horror genre and evoke fear in viewers, though it does not explain the specific turning point.
"Psycho (1960), Halloween (1978) and The Shining (1980) are seminal films that have been instrumental in both shaping the horror genre and eliciting the emotional response of fear in the viewer."
Eliciting Fear in Psycho (1960), Halloween (1978) and The Shining (1980) (2020)
[4] supported
Psycho became the second highest-grossing film of 1960, behind Spartacus, earning about $32 million at the box office.
"It went on to become the second highest-grossing film of 1960 , behind Spartacus"
Psycho (1960 film)
[5] supported
Psycho was made on an $800,000 budget, the lowest-cost film of Hitchcock's Hollywood career, and Hitchcock deferred his salary for a 60 percent share of the profits.
"With an $800,000 budget ($7 million today), it was the lowest-cost film in his Hollywood career. He used his TV crew, not his usual collaborators, shot in secrecy under a false title. He also agreed to defer his salary for a 60 percent share in the film’s profits, which gave him by far the biggest payday in his career."
Psycho Turns 60 This Week: How the 1960 Release Created an Iconic Film
[6] supported
Psycho is considered a prototype of the slasher/serial killer subgenre.
"which are the prototypes of the slasher/serial killer subgenre and natural horror respectively"
The Banal Sources of Fear: Alfred Hitchcock and the Horror Genre (2025)
[7] supported
The source identifies the subjective camera as the primary technique for inducing fear in Psycho, Halloween, and The Shining.
"the primary technique for inducing fear is the employment of the subjective camera."
Eliciting Fear in Psycho (1960), Halloween (1978) and The Shining (1980) (2020)
[8] supported
On Metacritic, Psycho received a weighted average score of 97 out of 100 from 18 critics, indicating universal acclaim.
"On Metacritic , the film has a weighted average score of 97 out of 100 based on 18 critics, indicating "universal acclaim"."
Psycho (1960 film)
[9] supported
Critics were denied press screenings and had to see Psycho with paying audiences, waiting in long lines, while the film had nonstop sellouts at its two opening theaters.
"No junkets, no press screenings, and not even exhibitors could see it before booking. Critics had to see it with the paying audiences, which meant waiting in line"
Psycho Turns 60 This Week: How the 1960 Release Created an Iconic Film
[10] supported
The source states that later horror directors Carpenter and Kubrick built on Hitchcock's techniques while developing new ones to keep up with changing audience expectations.
"Both Carpenter and Kubrick built on Hitchcock as well as developed new techniques, with the aid of new technology, in order to keep up with changing audience perceptions and expectations."
Eliciting Fear in Psycho (1960), Halloween (1978) and The Shining (1980) (2020)
[11] supported
The Rotten Tomatoes critical consensus said Psycho was infamous for its shower scene but immortal for its contribution to horror, and that Hitchcock validated the genre rather than just creating modern horror.
"Infamous for its shower scene, but immortal for its contribution to the horror genre. Because Psycho was filmed with tact, grace, and art, Hitchcock didn't just create modern horror, he validated it"
Psycho (1960 film)
[12] supported
According to Robert E. Kapsis, Psycho and The Birds helped give the horror genre an air of respectability, coinciding with the growth of Hitchcock's reputation as an artist in the 1960s.
"the growth of Hitchcock’s reputation as an artistic director, not a mere entertainer, in the 1960s coincided with the release of Psycho and The Birds, which helped to wrap the horror genre in the veil of respectability."
The Banal Sources of Fear: Alfred Hitchcock and the Horror Genre (2025)
[13] supported
Roger Ebert wrote in 1998 that Psycho endures because it connects directly with audiences' fears, including fears of committing crimes, of police, of madmen, and of disappointing their mothers.
"What makes Psycho immortal, when so many films are already half-forgotten as we leave the theater, is that it connects directly with our fears"
Psycho (1960 film)
[14] supported
When Psycho opened, some critics gave it less-than-stellar reviews in its opening weekend, possibly because Hitchcock had refused to let critics see the film beforehand.
"In addition to withholding the release of any stills from the movie's key scenes, Hitchcock refused to let film critics see the movie ahead of time, which may have accounted for some of the movie's less-than-stellar opening weekend reviews."
14 Facts About Alfred Hitchcock's <em>Psycho</em>
[15] supported
Psycho was Hitchcock's most successful film financially, earning $32 million at the North American box office on a production budget of about $807,000.
"Psycho was Alfred Hitchcock's most successful film, financially speaking. It made $32 million at the North American box office during it first theatrical release, off of a production budget of approximately $807,000."
14 Facts About Alfred Hitchcock's <em>Psycho</em>
[16] supported
Hitchcock financed Psycho himself after Paramount had doubts, paying for it out of his own pocket and giving up his director's fee for 60 percent ownership of the film.
"Paramount had all sorts of cold feet regarding the project, which prompted Hitchcock to both pay for the film out of his own pocket and forgo his (rather substantial) director's fee in exchange for 60 percent ownership of the film."
14 Facts About Alfred Hitchcock's <em>Psycho</em>
[17] supported
Hitchcock instructed theaters not to admit latecomers once Psycho had started, so audiences had to arrive on time.
"he also instructed theaters to not allow anyone in once the film had started."
14 Facts About Alfred Hitchcock's <em>Psycho</em>
[18] supported
Psycho had mixed to hostile critical reception but was a box office sensation.
"Although critical reception was decidedly mixed and often downright hostile, the movie was a box office sensation."
Critics' Corner - Psycho
[19] supported
Cinema historians consider Psycho to be the starting point of the slasher horror genre.
"cinema historians consider Psycho to be the genesis of the “slasher” horror genre"
The world's most comprehensive Film database - AFI Catalog
[20] supported
Psycho was produced for about $800,000 and earned more than ten times that on its initial release.
"Produced for only about $800,000, it earned more than ten times that on its initial release ($14 million by many accounts)"
Critics' Corner - Psycho
[21] supported
Psycho was ground-breaking in its approach to horror in everyday life at the time of its release.
"At the time of its release, Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho (1960) was truly ground-breaking in its approach to horror in everyday life."
The Birth of Modern Horror (2019)
[22] supported
Variety reported that the original Psycho was the second-highest-grossing film of 1960, behind Ben-Hur.
"which also noted that the original production was the “second-best grossing film” of 1960, after Ben-Hur (see entry)"
The world's most comprehensive Film database - AFI Catalog
[23] supported
Psycho became the highest grossing film for Paramount, which had initially wanted nothing to do with it, and was the second-highest box office champion of 1960 behind Ben-Hur.
"It was the highest grossing film for Paramount - which initially wanted nothing to do with it - and the second-highest box office champion for 1960 behind Ben-Hur ."
Critics' Corner - Psycho
[24] supported
The film was marketed with a campaign prohibiting anyone from entering the theater once the picture started and an audience plea not to reveal the ending.
"The film was marketed with a highly successful campaign prohibiting anyone from entering the theater once the picture started and an audience plea not to reveal the ending to anyone who hadn't seen it."
Critics' Corner - Psycho
[25] supported
Psycho was a low-budget film that changed the face of horror, and the chapter examines this against a Hollywood under mounting pressures.
"the chapter examines how Hitchock's low-budget film changed the face of horror forever."
The Birth of Modern Horror (2019)
[26] supported
According to Janet Leigh's book, Perkins was shocked on his return to the United States to learn of the film's far-reaching impact.
"she claims that he was shocked to learn of its far-reaching impact upon his return"
The world's most comprehensive Film database - AFI Catalog
[27] supported
A London critic called the film more miserable than the most miserable peep show he had ever seen, while Variety praised Perkins's dreamlike performance.
""More miserable than the most miserable peep show I have ever seen." "
Critics' Corner - Psycho