ANTHILLAsk your own question
Answer · confidence: partial

Has any court or regulator called a crypto unit money, not property, and why?

Research question: Has any court or regulator anywhere formally classified a crypto unit as money rather than property, and what was the reasoning?

The verified facts do not show any court or regulator formally classifying a crypto unit as money rather than property. The U.S. IRS treats virtual currency as property 1, and the CFTC treats it as a commodity rather than money 818. Germany's BaFin called Bitcoin a unit of account and a financial instrument under the Banking Act, while noting it is not legal tender 52. A federal district court held that cryptocurrency counts as 'funds' under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, reasoning that this accords with Congress's intent to protect consumers 1116, though that is a statutory meaning rather than a formal classification as money. The newest fact is dated 2025-09-22, about thirteen months before October 2026, so later developments are not reflected 23.

Checked 2026-10-18. Only documented and supported facts are used.
Dig deeper on this question

Sources

[1] supported
The IRS treats virtual currency as property, not as money or currency, for U.S. federal tax purposes, under Notice 2014-21, so general property transaction rules apply.
"Internal Revenue Service, Notice 2014-21, IRS Virtual Currency Guidance: Virtual Currency Is Treated as Property for U.S. Federal Tax Purposes; General Rules for Property Transactions Apply (Mar. 25, 2014)."
Virtual currency law in the United States
[2] supported
In Germany, Bitcoin is not classified as legal tender (Zahlungsmittel), e-money, or foreign currency or banknotes.
"In Deutschland ist Bitcoin weder Zahlungsmittel, noch E-Geld , Devisen oder Sorten"
Zahlungsmittel
[3] supported
South Africa's revenue authority classified bitcoin as an intangible asset, not as currency.
"The South African Revenue Service classified bitcoin as an intangible asset."
Legality of cryptocurrency by country or territory
[4] supported
The IRS describes virtual currencies as a digital representation of value that functions as a medium of exchange, unit of account, and/or store of value, but without legal tender status in any jurisdiction.
"The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) describes Virtual Currencies (VCs) as "a digital representation of value that functions as a medium of exchange , a unit of account , and/or a store of value [and] does not have legal tender status in any jurisdiction.""
Virtual currency law in the United States
[5] supported
According to BaFin, Germany's financial regulator, Bitcoin is a unit of account that can be used in multilateral clearing circles, and therefore counts as a financial instrument under the German Banking Act (KWG).
"allerdings ist es nach der Feststellung der BaFin eine Rechnungseinheit ( englisch unit of account ), welche in „multilateralen Verrechnungskreisen“ eingesetzt werden kann, und somit Finanzinstrument im Sinne des"
Zahlungsmittel
[6] supported
Kyrgyzstan treats bitcoin as a commodity, not as a security or a currency, which allows it to be mined, bought, sold and traded on a local commodity exchange.
"Bitcoin is considered a commodity, [ 63 ] not a security or currency under the laws of the Kyrgyz Republic and may be legally mined, bought, sold and traded on a local commodity exchange."
Legality of cryptocurrency by country or territory
[7] supported
The US Treasury in 2013 defined virtual currency as a medium of exchange that operates like a currency in some environments but lacks all the attributes of real currency.
"The US Department of Treasury in 2013 defined it more tersely as "a medium of exchange that operates like a currency in some environments, but does not have all the attributes of real currency"."
Digital currency
[8] supported
The CFTC regulates virtual currencies as commodities rather than as money.
"The Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulates as commodities."
Virtual currency law in the United States
[9] supported
South Africa's central bank declared in December 2014 that virtual currency had no legal status or regulatory framework.
"whereby it declared that virtual currency had "no legal status or regulatory framework"."
Legality of cryptocurrency by country or territory
[10] supported
A U.S. judge ruled that virtual currencies are commodities.
""Virtual currencies are commodities, US judge rules" . CNBC. Reuters . March 7, 2018"
Virtual currency law in the United States
[11] supported
A federal district court held that cryptocurrency, described as a digital form of liquid monetary assets, unambiguously counts as 'funds' under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA).
"A Federal district court also recently held that cryptocurrency, as a ``digital form of liquid, monetary assets,'' unambiguously constitutes ``funds'' under EFTA."
Electronic Fund Transfers Through Accounts Established Primarily for Personal, Family, or Household Purposes Using Emerging Payment Mechanisms (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 2025-01-15)
[12] supported
The European Central Bank in 2012 defined virtual currency as unregulated digital money issued and usually controlled by its developers and accepted within a specific virtual community.
"A virtual currency has been defined in 2012 by the European Central Bank as "a type of unregulated, digital money, which is issued and usually controlled by its developers, and used and accepted among the members of a specific virtual community "."
Digital currency
[13] supported
The European Union has not passed specific legislation on bitcoin's status as a currency, but has stated that VAT/GST does not apply to conversion between fiat currency and bitcoin.
"has stated that VAT/GST is not applicable to the conversion between traditional (fiat) currency and bitcoin."
Legality of cryptocurrency by country or territory
[14] supported
Several courts interpreting 'funds' in federal money transmitter and money laundering statutes held that the term is not limited to fiat currency and includes other assets, including widely held currencies like Bitcoin.
"Several courts interpreting ``funds'' in the context of Federal money transmitter and money laundering statutes have similarly held that the term ``funds'' is not limited to fiat currency and encompasses other types of assets, including widely held currencies like Bitcoin."
Electronic Fund Transfers Through Accounts Established Primarily for Personal, Family, or Household Purposes Using Emerging Payment Mechanisms (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 2025-01-15)
[15] supported
The US Internal Revenue Service classified virtual currency, cryptocurrency and digital currency as property for tax purposes, so gains and losses are taxable.
"defines any virtual currency, cryptocurrency and digital currency as property; gains and losses are taxable"
Virtual currency
[16] supported
The CFPB reasons that reading 'funds' to include cryptocurrency accords with Congress's intent by protecting consumers and giving them access to innovative electronic fund transfer systems.
"These interpretations of ``funds'' accord with Congress's intent by ensuring that consumers are adequately protected and have access to the benefits of innovative electronic fund transfer systems and technology."
Electronic Fund Transfers Through Accounts Established Primarily for Personal, Family, or Household Purposes Using Emerging Payment Mechanisms (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 2025-01-15)
[17] supported
Different government agencies and regulators within the same jurisdiction often define digital currency types in different and conflicting ways, so the legal meaning depends on context.
"Within any specific government jurisdiction, different agencies and regulators define different and often conflicting meanings for the different types of digital currency based on the specific properties of a specific currency type or sub-type."
Digital currency
[18] supported
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission determined that virtual currencies are properly defined as commodities, not money.
"has determined virtual currencies are properly defined as commodities in 2015"
Virtual currency
[19] supported
Many large credit card issuers classify virtual currency purchases as cash advances, reflecting the money-like nature of the funds held in those accounts.
"advances,'' reflecting the money-like nature of the funds held in these accounts."
Electronic Fund Transfers Through Accounts Established Primarily for Personal, Family, or Household Purposes Using Emerging Payment Mechanisms (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 2025-01-15)
[20] supported
A European definition of virtual currency states that it does not have legal status as currency or money, though it is accepted as a means of exchange.
"and does not possess a legal status of currency or money, but is accepted by natural or legal persons as a means of exchange"
Virtual currency
[21] supported
El Salvador's legislature amended its Bitcoin Law so that bitcoin is no longer legally classed as currency, although it remains legal tender.
"Under the new rules, bitcoin is no longer considered "currency," though it remains "legal tender.""
El Salvador walks back its bitcoin law, ending its status as legal currency
[22] supported
The IMF made mitigating the risks of El Salvador's bitcoin project a condition for a proposed $1.4 billion Extended Fund Facility loan, which was part of the reason for the legal changes.
"One of the conditions for a proposed $1.4 billion Extended Fund Facility loan was that El Salvador mitigate "potential risks of the Bitcoin project.""
El Salvador walks back its bitcoin law, ending its status as legal currency
[23] supported
The agencies described convertible virtual currency as a medium of exchange that lacks legal tender status, and said the revised rules would apply to transactions involving it, which is the basis for treating it within the money-transfer rules.
"The Agencies intend that the revised proposal will ensure that the rules apply to domestic and cross-border transactions involving convertible virtual currency, which is a medium of exchange (such as cryptocurrency) that either has an equivalent value as currency, or acts as a substitute for currency, but lacks legal tender status."
Semiannual Agenda (Treasury Department, 2025-09-22)