ANTHILLAsk your own question
Money · 6 min read · easy read

Who Got to Make Money, and How the Rules Changed

The Senate passed the currency conference report on December 23, 1913. The vote was 43 to 25 20. An earlier version of the bill passed the Senate 54 to 34 25. More senators voted on that earlier version than on the final vote 25. The record does not name the senators who were away 20.

This is research, not financial advice.
Watch the 2-minute video
Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Library of Congress (see source for rights)
Last checked 2026-10-23. Sentence check: 5 paragraphs passed, 11 repaired, 3 removed. Every number links to the exact quote. Read the full version

In short

On December 22, 1913, the House voted on a conference report for H.R. 7837. It set the short name of the law as the "Federal Reserve Act" 14. Under the changed bill, railroad bonds could be used as the base for emergency money 2. The speaker said this could not be defended. Such bonds were often sold for more than the roads were really worth 2. Under the changed Federal Reserve Act, country banks had to keep 7 percent of demand deposits as reserves. This was the lowest of the three levels 65. This source describes those levels as they were when the change was made, not in the 1930s 65. After the gold window closed, the dollar fell on currency markets 34. One source says commercial banks can increase the money supply by creating money through lending 26. The money supply goes down when loans are repaid 26. A cited economist says that today there is hardly any visible link between the central bank money base and the money supply 33. After regular trading closed, an exchange-traded fund that tracks the S&P 500 rose 44.

A Big Argument About a Money Bank, 1908–1912

William J. Bryan wrote the Nebraska Democrats' platform. It said no to the Fowler bill and the Aldrich bill 71. It said the federal government should issue and control emergency money 71. In 1912, the Progressive Party said no to the Aldrich bill. They said it would put our money and credit in private hands 74. In 1912, the Democrats also said no to the Aldrich bill and to a central bank 75. Their win in that election ended any chance the Aldrich bill would come back in the 63rd Congress 79.

The evidence does not show how the 1898 Monetary Commission bills listed by E. J. Hill affected the 1913 Act 1.

The Votes in December 1913

The Senate passed the currency bill by a vote of 54 to 34 18. On December 22, 1913, the House voted on a report for H.R. 7837 14. The report named the act the "Federal Reserve Act" 14. Carter Glass, a Democrat from Virginia, sponsored that vote 15.

On December 23, the Senate voted 43 to 25 to pass the bill 2024. Every Democratic senator who was there and voted, including Senator Hitchcock of Nebraska, voted yes 21. Six Republicans also voted yes, and so did Progressive Senator Poindexter 23. Almost 30 senators had left for Christmas vacation. That likely explains why fewer senators voted 22.

The law said only that between eight and twelve Reserve Banks would be set up. An organizing committee would choose how many there would be and where they would go 50.

Rules for Lending Money to Banks, 1916–1921

Section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act lets Federal reserve banks lend money to member banks for up to fifteen days. The loans are backed by eligible paper, United States obligations, or similar collateral 55. The Federal Reserve Board proposed letting reserve banks issue Federal Reserve notes directly, backed by gold deposited with the Federal Reserve agents. Congress rejected this idea 51. Congress also rejected a plan to make Federal Reserve notes legal reserve money for member banks 51.

The 1916 changes let the Board act with a vote of at least five members 54. The Board could let member banks follow one general rule that covers all districts alike 54. A reserve bank cannot rediscount for a member bank when paper from the same maker or indorser is more than ten per cent of the member bank's capital and surplus 58. The Board has no legal power to step in on reserve bank directors deciding whether to discount paper that qualifies, when that paper is offered to them 57.

Rules for How Much Money Banks Must Keep, 1930s

Under the changed Federal Reserve Act, country banks had to keep 7 percent of demand deposits as reserves. This was the lowest of the three levels 65. Reserve city banks had to keep 10 percent of demand deposits as reserves 67. Central reserve city banks, the highest level, had to keep 13 percent 69. These levels show the rules as they were when the law was changed 65.

In June 1936, country banks held 29 percent of the total assets of Fed member banks. Big city banks in New York and Chicago were much larger on average 64. From June 1936 to June 1937, country banks' reserve deposits rose 35 percent, or $350 million. New York's big city banks rose 31 percent 66. In the same year, country banks bought $350 million more in government securities. They also made $305 million more in loans. Even so, their ratio of reserves to assets stayed almost flat 68. Simulations suggest the overall rise in reserve demand was driven by a group of city banks 70.

Bank runs also changed. After the FDIC was made in 1933, there were almost no bank runs. Wilcox says this is one reason bankers did not need to keep huge amounts of extra money after 1934 72. The fall in interest rates can explain 80 percent of the change in extra money during the Great Depression 73.

When Dollars Stopped Being Swapped for Gold, 1971

Plans to break with gold were made in secret. Volcker and others at the Treasury secretly made backup plans for ending gold convertibility starting in the spring of 1971 12. At the August 13 Cabinet Room meeting, the President's August 15 speech was on the list of topics. But the tape log does not say why that date was picked 65. The agenda included the convertibility of the dollar and questions about the price of gold 9.

After that, the dollar fell in money trading 34. People talked about what the August 15, 1971 action did, including the New Economic Policy 8.

Where Things Are Today

Researchers have tested whether a central bank's reserves turn into loans. One study used Federal Reserve QE programs. It found that reserve creation leads to higher total loan growth and more risk-taking 16. Another paper looked at the first round of Bank of England QE purchases in 2009 and 2010. It suggested these may have led to a small but statistically significant increase in bank lending growth 17. Selgin (2017) explains that banks turn excess reserves into required reserves by making loans. Total reserves stay the same 27. Bernanke and Kohn (2016) pointed out that bank lending rose along with banks' reserve holdings after the financial crisis. They used this as evidence that reserves are held in addition to other assets 29. Keister (2016) also argues that reserves are generally held in addition to banks' other assets. They do not replace those assets 31. One article argues that minimum reserve ratios in developed economies are so low that they do not limit money creation by commercial banks. It gives the eurozone ratio as 1% 60. Another document says the Bank of England, and the central banks of Australia, Canada and Sweden, currently have no minimum reserve requirement 61. An economist notes that today there is hardly any visible connection between the central bank money base and the money supply 33. The monetary base also does not have a fixed ratio to the broader money measures M1 to M3 28.

An economist says that today there is hardly any clear link between the central bank money base and the money supply 33. Separately, a fund that follows the S&P 500 went up after regular trading ended 44. Also, bets on artificial intelligence on Wall Street picked up again. Stocks rose late in the day after good results raised trust in the trade that has pushed the bull market up 46. The stock market news says nothing about how money is created. So the cited material alone does not show how money is created today.

Still unknown

The evidence has no Mesopotamian, Egyptian or other ancient records, so whether money began as barter, debt or temple accounting remains an open question here.

The August 1971 logs list the speech but do not explain why August 15 was chosen or what economic data and political pressures drove the choice.

Central bank explainers and academic studies point in different directions on whether reserves limit loans, and this evidence does not settle which account is right.

The internet-economy and digital-payment lanes are thin: no checked platform take-rate, advertising-revenue, stablecoin-reserve or regulatory evidence appears in this set, so how online platforms create and capture money is still unanswered.

Explore this colony and ask your own questions

Connected to other stories

United States also appears in Do crypto insiders really take money from other investors?, Did Israel's ten lost tribes really disappear forever?, How early did people really reach Australia and Asia?, Where did Cajun and Creole people really come from?, What are the best ways to make money online in 2027?, Is the US government really poisoning us with processed food?, How long has AI been around for everyone to use?, Is it really only three licks to reach a Tootsie Pop center?, Could One Bitcoin Really Be Worth $200,000?, Have leaked Project 2025 plans really been happening?, Has Anyone Ever Used the Internet for Time Travel?, Did South Gate, California's city government really have corruption problems?, Why hasn't anyone flown to Mars yet?, Did the Poythress Family Really Come From Pocahontas?, How much would 10 sales a day at $500 make?, Can you really make money trading crypto?, What was the first real crypto trade, and when did it happen?, Who Is the Richest Freemason, and Can We Prove It?, Is the US really just taking minerals from Congo?, Can Anyone Really Name the First Horror Movie Ever Made?.

European Union also appears in Do crypto insiders really take money from other investors?, What are the best ways to make money online in 2027?, Is the US government really poisoning us with processed food?, How long has AI been around for everyone to use?, Could One Bitcoin Really Be Worth $200,000?, Can you really make money trading crypto?, What was the first real crypto trade, and when did it happen?, Is the US really just taking minerals from Congo?.

COVID-19 pandemic also appears in Could One Bitcoin Really Be Worth $200,000?, Have leaked Project 2025 plans really been happening?, Why hasn't anyone flown to Mars yet?, Can you really make money trading crypto?.

United States Congress also appears in How early did people really reach Australia and Asia?, Is the US government really poisoning us with processed food?, Have leaked Project 2025 plans really been happening?, Why hasn't anyone flown to Mars yet?, What was the first real crypto trade, and when did it happen?, Is the US really just taking minerals from Congo?.

Federal Trade Commission also appears in Do crypto insiders really take money from other investors?, How long has AI been around for everyone to use?, Have leaked Project 2025 plans really been happening?, How much would 10 sales a day at $500 make?, Can you really make money trading crypto?.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission also appears in Do crypto insiders really take money from other investors?, How long has AI been around for everyone to use?, Could One Bitcoin Really Be Worth $200,000?, Can you really make money trading crypto?, What was the first real crypto trade, and when did it happen?.

Canada also appears in How early did people really reach Australia and Asia?, Where did Cajun and Creole people really come from?, What are the best ways to make money online in 2027?, Is the US government really poisoning us with processed food?, Why is the sky blue but sometimes gray?, How long has AI been around for everyone to use?, Could One Bitcoin Really Be Worth $200,000?, How much would 10 sales a day at $500 make?, Can you really make money trading crypto?, Who Is the Richest Freemason, and Can We Prove It?, Can Anyone Really Name the First Horror Movie Ever Made?.

Vietnam War also appears in How early did people really reach Australia and Asia?, Why hasn't anyone flown to Mars yet?, Can Anyone Really Name the First Horror Movie Ever Made?.

Sources

[1] supported · archive source
The checklist catalogs a work on Monetary Commission bills for currency reform by E. J. Hill, but the excerpt does not show how such materials influenced the 1913 Act.
"and Monetary Commission bills for reform of currency; by E. J. Hill. 1898."
Checklist of United States Public Documents 1789-1909: Congressional: to ..., page 1753
[2] supported · primary source
Under the amended bill, railroad bonds could serve as the basis for emergency currency issue, which the speaker called indefensible because railroad bonds were often issued in excess of the physical value of the roads.
"Under this feature of the bill, rail railroad - road railroad bonds can be used as the basis for currency issue, which, to my mind, is absolutely indefensible"
Image 7 of St. Landry clarion (Opelousas, La.), August 15, 1908
[3] supported · primary source
The final bill was amended so that any kind of security held by banks could be the basis for emergency currency, provided a voluntary association of banks with at least $5,000,000 in capital and surplus approved it.
"When the bill finallX passed the house and senate, it was so amended that any kind of security held by the banks was made the basis for an emergency currency, provided such security should first"
Image 7 of St. Landry clarion (Opelousas, La.), August 15, 1908
[4] supported · primary source
The speaker changed his view of the National Monetary Commission after attending its meeting, coming to believe its members sincerely intended to frame a bill after examining the banking systems of the old world.
"Since I attended the meeting of the commission, I have changed my view, and I now believe that it is the sincere purpose of all of the mem members - bers members of the commission, after a careful examination of the financial and banking systems of the old world"
Image 7 of St. Landry clarion (Opelousas, La.), August 15, 1908
[5] supported · primary source
The tape log lists the President's August 15, 1971 economic announcement as a discussion topic, but it does not describe the economic data or political pressures behind choosing that date.
"The President’s August 15, 1971 economic announcement"
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF Tape Subject Log (rev. 2/24) 1
[6] supported · primary source
The Tape Subject Log lists the President's speech of August 15, 1971 as a discussion topic in the August 13 Cabinet Room meeting, but it gives no reasons for choosing that date.
"President’s speech, August 15, 1971"
Cabinet Room #69: August 13-16, 1971 [Tape Subject Log]
[7] supported · primary source
On August 15, 1971, Nixon's day began at Camp David, Maryland, where he met with his economic advisers.
"The President's day began at Camp David, Maryland"
August 15, 1971
[8] supported · primary source
The tape discussion covered the effect of the August 15, 1971 action, including the New Economic Policy.
"Effect of August 15, 1971 action"
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF Tape Subject Log (rev. 2/24) 1
[9] supported · primary source
Topics on the agenda included the convertibility of the dollar and questions about the price of gold, which relate to the international monetary pressures of the period.
"-Convertibility of Dollar"
Cabinet Room #69: August 13-16, 1971 [Tape Subject Log]
[10] supported · primary source
Photo records show that visitors at Camp David that day were primarily Presidential economic advisers attending a meeting there.
"A Guest book signed by current visitors (primarily Presidential economic advisors) currently at Camp David for a meeting."
August 15, 1971
[11] supported · primary source
Nixon prepared a televised address on the economy and economic reforms from the Oval Office on August 15, 1971, and Treasury Secretary John B. Connally gave a press briefing on the wage-price freeze that day.
"President Nixon preparing to deliver a televised address on the economy and economic reforms from the Oval Office."
August 15, 1971
[12] supported · archive source
Volcker and others at the Treasury had secretly been preparing contingency plans for removing gold convertibility since the spring of 1971.
"spring of 1971 secretly been preparing contingency plans for removing gold convertibility."
One nation under gold, page 410
[13] supported · archive source
The announcement came on a Sunday night in August 1971, when Nixon acted on the gold convertibility question.
"On a Sunday night in August 1971, with"
One nation under gold, page 410
[14] documented · scholarly source
The December 22, 1913 vote was on the conference report for H.R. 7837, which set the short title of the act as the "Federal Reserve Act."
"TO AGREE TO CONFERENCE REPORT #163 ON H. R. 7837, WHICH PROVIDES THAT THE HOUSE RECEDE FROM ITS DISAGREEMENT TO THE SENATE AMENDMENT AND AGREE TO THE SAME WITH AN AMENDMENT THAT THE SHORT TITLE OF THIS ACT SHALL BE THE "FEDERAL RESERVE ACT.""
Voteview
[15] supported · scholarly source
The December 22, 1913 vote was sponsored by Carter Glass, a Democrat from Virginia.
"Sponsor: GLASS, Carter (D-VA)"
Voteview
[16] supported · scholarly source
Using Federal Reserve QE programs, the paper finds that bank-level reserve creation causes higher total loan growth and increased risk taking.
"Consistent with the theory, we document that reserve creation leads to higher total loan growth and increased risk taking."
Quantitative Easing and Bank Risk Taking: Evidence from Lending (2015)
[17] supported · scholarly source
The paper suggests that the first round of Bank of England QE purchases in 2009-10 may have produced a small but statistically significant increase in bank lending growth.
"Based on the historical bank-level relationship between deposits and bank lending, our analysis suggests that the first round of the Bank’s QE purchases during 2009-10 may have led to a small but statistically significant increase in bank lending growth."
Quantitative Easing and Bank Lending: A Panel Data Approach (2014)
[18] documented · primary source
The Senate passed the currency bill by a vote of 54 to 34.
"passed the senate last night by a vote of 54 to 34."
Image 1 of The Hattiesburg news (Hattiesburg, Miss.), December 20, 1913
[19] supported · primary source
The Senate passed the administration currency bill by a roll call vote of 54 to 34, according to the article's headline.
"ROLL GALL RESULTS 54 TO 34"
Image 1 of The Wibaux pioneer (Wibaux, Mont.), December 26, 1913
[20] supported · primary source
The Senate adopted the currency conference report on December 23, 1913, by a vote of 43 to 25; the document does not name absent or paired senators.
"adopted the currency conference report by a vote of 43 to 25."
Image 1 of The Chickasha daily express (Chickasha, Indian Territory [Okla.]), December 23, 1913
[21] supported · primary source
Every Democratic senator who was present and voting, including Senator Hitchcock of Nebraska, was recorded in favor of the bill.
"Every Democratic senator present and vot-j Ins, including Senator Hitchcock ot Nebraska, was recorded in favor of the bill."
Image 1 of The Wibaux pioneer (Wibaux, Mont.), December 26, 1913
[22] supported · reference source
By the time the final Federal Reserve bill came to a Senate vote, almost 30 senators had left for Christmas vacation, which likely explains the lower turnout.
"but almost 30 senators had left for Christmas vacation by the time the final bill came to a vote."
History of the Federal Reserve System
[23] supported · primary source
Six Republicans voted for the currency bill, along with Progressive Senator Poindexter of Washington.
"Six Republicans voted for it"
Image 1 of The Wibaux pioneer (Wibaux, Mont.), December 26, 1913
[24] supported · reference source
The final bill passed the Senate the day after the House vote, by 43 votes to 25.
"passed the Senate the next day by a vote of 43 to 25."
History of the Federal Reserve System
[25] supported · reference source
An earlier version of the bill had passed the Senate by 54 votes to 34, a higher turnout than the final vote.
"An earlier version of the bill had passed the Senate 54 to 34"
History of the Federal Reserve System
[26] supported · reference source
Money supply can be increased by commercial banks creating money through lending and reduced when loans are repaid.
"Geldmengen können durch Geldschöpfung im Rahmen der Kreditvergabe durch Geschäftsbanken erhöht und durch die Tilgung von Krediten gesenkt werden."
Translation: Money supply can be increased by money creation within the framework of lending by commercial banks and reduced by the repayment of loans.
Geldmenge
[27] supported · scholarly source
Selgin (2017) explains that banks convert excess reserves into required reserves by creating loans, which raises required reserves and lowers excess reserves even though total reserves are unchanged.
"As Selgin (2017, pp.18-20) explains, banks convert their excess reserves into required reserves by creating loans, which increases required reserves and decreases excess reserves, even though the total quantity of reserves remains unchanged."
Bank Lending and Interest on Excess Reserves (2018)
[28] supported · reference source
The monetary base (central bank money or reserves) does not have a fixed ratio to the broader money aggregates M1 to M3.
"Auch steht die Geldbasis in keinem festen Verhältnis zu den Mengen M1 bis M3."
Translation: Also, the monetary base does not stand in any fixed relationship to the quantities M1 to M3.
Geldmenge
[29] supported · scholarly source
Bernanke and Kohn (2016) argued that bank lending rose alongside banks' reserve holdings after the financial crisis, as evidence that reserves are held in addition to other assets.
"As evidence for this proposition, Bernanke and Kohn (2016) point out that while banks’ reserve holdings have increased since the financial crisis, bank lending has increased as well."
Bank Lending and Interest on Excess Reserves (2018)
[30] supported · reference source
Central bank reserves serve as a means of payment only between commercial banks, so M0 is not a subset of M1 to M3 except for the cash held by non-banks.
"M0 ist bis auf den Bargeldanteil bei Nichtbanken nicht Teilmenge von M1 bis M3, da Zentralbankreserven nur zwischen Geschäftsbanken als Zahlungsmittel dienen."
Translation: M0 is not a subset of M1 to M3, except for the cash share held by non-banks, because central bank reserves only serve as a means of payment between commercial banks.
Geldmenge
[31] supported · scholarly source
Keister (2016) argues that reserves are generally held in addition to banks' other assets, rather than substituting for them.
"Keister (2016, p.5 emphasis in original), for example, argues that “reserves are, in general, held in addition to banks other assets.”"
Bank Lending and Interest on Excess Reserves (2018)
[32] supported · reference source
The Federal Reserve defines M0 as currency in circulation plus deposits that credit institutions hold at the Fed.
"M0 : Bargeldumlauf plus Guthaben der Kreditinstitute bei der Fed;"
Translation: M0: currency in circulation plus balances of credit institutions at the Fed;
Geldmenge
[33] supported · reference source
A cited economist notes that today there is hardly any visible connection between the central bank money base and the money supply.
"heute kaum mehr Zusammenhang sichtbar"
Translation: hardly any connection visible today
Geldmenge
[34] supported · archive source
After the gold window closed, the dollar fell on currency markets.
"The dollar fell on currency markets"
HISTORY OF CENTRAL BANKING IN GREAT BRITAIN AND THE UNITED STATES., page 466
[35] supported · primary source
Wall Street stock prices rose sharply as an oversold market rebounded at the expense of Chicago grain shorts, and the report said this rally did not signal anything about crop prospects.
"That an oversold market should rise sharply does not indicate anything regarding crop prospects."
Image 11 of Weekly union (Manchester, N.H.), July 24, 1901
[36] supported · primary source
On March 5, 1914, New York stock quotations closed with general losses, led by railroad stocks.
"Closing quo- S tations today showed general losses"
Image 5 of The Daily Missoulian (Missoula, Mont.), March 6, 1914, (Morning)
[37] supported · primary source
Wall Street felt good on the day, with the report calling Monday's selloff 'Blue Monday' and Tuesday's rebound 'pink Tuesday' even though the crop and strike situations had not materially changed.
"Wall street felt good today and that without material change in the crop or strike situation, Blue Monday was followed by pink Tuesday."
Image 11 of Weekly union (Manchester, N.H.), July 24, 1901
[38] supported · primary source
In New York trading, copper shares fell on less favorable trade reports.
"Copper shares were heavy on less favorable trade reports."
Image 5 of The Daily Missoulian (Missoula, Mont.), March 6, 1914, (Morning)
[39] supported · primary source
Corn prices fell sharply and wheat prices dropped in the grain market, reversing the earlier rise.
"Corn had a heavy fall, and wheat made concessions in price,"
Image 11 of Weekly union (Manchester, N.H.), July 24, 1901
[40] documented · primary source
The New York stock market slump on February 24, 1898 was so sudden and violent that trading almost took on panic conditions, but the wave of liquidation was practically over in less than half an hour, followed by quick recoveries.
"was practically over in less than half an hour and then there were some quick recoveries."
Image 9 of The Anaconda standard (Anaconda, Mont.), February 25, 1898, (Morning)
[41] documented · primary source
New York stock trading on March 5, 1914 had total sales with a par value of $2,685,000.
"Total sales, par value, $2,685,000."
Image 5 of The Daily Missoulian (Missoula, Mont.), March 6, 1914, (Morning)
[42] documented · primary source
London was a large buyer of American stocks on February 24, 1898, with its total purchases estimated at 40,000 shares, or 100,000 shares over two days.
"its total purchases being esti estimated - mated estimated at 40,000 shares, or 100,000 shares in two days."
Image 9 of The Anaconda standard (Anaconda, Mont.), February 25, 1898, (Morning)
[43] supported · primary source
London stock markets were dull on February 24, 1898, depressed by New York and Paris, with Americans very dull on New York selling and closing weak on liquidation of some bull accounts in London.
"The stock markets here were dull to-day, be being - ing being depressed by New York and Paris."
Image 9 of The Anaconda standard (Anaconda, Mont.), February 25, 1898, (Morning)
[44] supported · established source
After the close of regular trading, an exchange-traded fund tracking the S&P 500 rose.
"An exchange-traded fund tracking the S&P 500 rose after the close of regular trading."
Stock Market Today: Dow, S&P Live Updates for October 21 - Bloomberg
[45] supported · primary source
The sensational fall in New York stocks on February 24, 1898 had considerable influence on the wheat market, as Wall Street operators extended their liquidating efforts to the grain pits in New York and Chicago.
"The sensational fall in stocks to-day unquestionably had con considerable - siderable considerable influence on wheat"
Image 9 of The Anaconda standard (Anaconda, Mont.), February 25, 1898, (Morning)
[46] supported · established source
Wall Street's artificial intelligence trade regained traction, with stocks rising in late hours after solid results bolstered confidence in the trade that has powered the bull market.
"Wall Street’s wagers on artificial intelligence regained traction, with stocks rising in late hours as solid results bolstered confidence in the trade that has powered the bull market."
Stock Market Today: Dow, S&P Live Updates for October 21 - Bloomberg
[47] supported · established source
Tesla's profit beat estimates, which eased worries about increased investment in new areas such as AI.
"Tesla Inc. ’s profit beat estimates, assuaging worries about increased investments into new areas such as AI."
Stock Market Today: Dow, S&P Live Updates for October 21 - Bloomberg
[48] supported · archive source
A 1916 amendment allowed Federal Reserve banks to make advances to member banks on their promissory notes for up to fifteen days, secured by eligible paper or Government securities.
"Accordingly, on September 7, 1916, an amendment to the Reserve Act was passed according to which such advances were to be permitted in cases where the member bank's note was limited to fifteen days' maturity and in cases where the collateral consisted either of the kind of paper eligible for rediscount or of Government securities."
The development of federal reserve policy., page 376
[49] supported · archive source
A note of a finance or credit company used to finance an industrial or commercial concern is ineligible for rediscount, even if it is secured by otherwise eligible paper.
"is not ehgible for rediscount, even though it may be secured by paper which is itself eligible for rediscount."
Commercial banking practice under the Federal Reserve Act, page 200
[50] supported · niche source
The Federal Reserve Act specified only that between eight and twelve Reserve Banks were to be established, with their number and locations set by an organizing committee.
"The FederalReserve Actspecified onlythatbetweeneightandtwelveReserve Banksweretobe established, withtheirnumberandlocations determinedby anorganizing committee."
National Monetary Policy by Regional Design: The Evolving Role of the Federal Reserve Banks in Federal Reserve System Policy (1998)
[51] supported · archive source
The Federal Reserve Board proposed letting reserve banks issue Federal Reserve notes directly against gold deposited with the Federal Reserve agents, but Congress rejected this proposal, along with a proposal to make Federal Reserve notes legal reserve money for member banks.
"It proposed an amendment which would permit reserve banks to issue Federal Reserve notes directly against the deposit of gold with the Federal Reserve agents. This suggestion was rejected by Congress together with another proposal that the Federal Reserve notes should be made legal reserve money for member banks."
The development of federal reserve policy., page 376
[52] supported · archive source
Eligibility of paper such as a cotton factor's note is decided by the use to which the proceeds of that particular note are put, not by the borrower's occupation.
"The mere fact that a borrower on a given note is a cotton factor does not of itself render that note ineligible since its eligibility is a matter to be determined by the use to which the proceeds of that particular note are put."
Commercial banking practice under the Federal Reserve Act, page 200
[53] supported · niche source
The Federal Reserve Act gave little guidance on how discount rates were to be determined, stating only that each Reserve Bank could set rates subject to review by the Federal Reserve Board.
"The FederalReserve Act,however, provided little guidance on how the rate was tobedetermined, statingonly that eachReserve Bankis authorized"
National Monetary Policy by Regional Design: The Evolving Role of the Federal Reserve Banks in Federal Reserve System Policy (1998)
[54] supported · archive source
The 1916 amendments gave the Federal Reserve Board power, by a vote of at least five members, to permit member banks by general ruling covering all districts alike.
"Upon the affirmative vote of not less than five of its members the Federal Reserve Board shall have power, from time to time, by general ruling covering all districts alike, to permit member"
The development of federal reserve policy., page 376
[55] supported · archive source
Section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act lets Federal reserve banks advance to member banks on their promissory notes for up to fifteen days, secured by eligible paper, United States obligations, or similar collateral.
"to its member banks on their promissory notes for a period not exceeding fifteen"
Commercial banking practice under the Federal Reserve Act, page 200
[56] supported · niche source
Under the Act, a member bank could rediscount short-term commercial loans with its Federal Reserve Bank to obtain additional reserve deposits or Federal Reserve notes.
"bankcould re-discountshort-termcommercialloans withtheirFederalReserveBank, and"
National Monetary Policy by Regional Design: The Evolving Role of the Federal Reserve Banks in Federal Reserve System Policy (1998)
[57] supported · archive source
The Federal Reserve Board had no legal power to interfere with the reserve banks' directors in deciding whether to discount eligible paper offered to them.
"The Federal Reserve Board has no power to interfere with the discretion given or the responsibility imposed by law upon the directors of a Federal Reserve Bank with respect to passing upon the merits of eligible paper oflered for discount."
The development of federal reserve policy., page 376
[58] supported · archive source
A Federal reserve bank has no authority to rediscount for a member bank where paper of the same maker or indorser exceeds ten per cent of the member bank's unimpaired capital and surplus.
"amounts to a total of more than ten per cent, of the unimpaired capital and surplus of that bank"
Commercial banking practice under the Federal Reserve Act, page 200
[59] supported · reference source
The document says central banks in several publications have refuted the money multiplier idea, which holds that a multiple of deposit money can be created from central bank money.
"Die irreführende, aber weit verbreitete Vorstellung eines Geldschöpfungsmultiplikators , der besagt, dass aus Zentralbankgeld ein Vielfaches an Giralgeld geschöpft werden könne, wurde zwar von Zentralbanken in verschiedenen Publikationen hinreichend widerlegt"
Mindestreserve
[60] supported · reference source
The article argues that minimum reserve ratios in developed economies are typically so low that they do not limit money creation by commercial banks; the eurozone ratio is cited as 1%.
"dass sie keine begrenzende Wirkung auf die Geldschöpfung durch Geschäftsbanken haben."
Translation: that they have no limiting effect on money creation by commercial banks.
Mindestreserve-System
[61] supported · reference source
The document says that the Bank of England, along with the central banks of Australia, Canada and Sweden, currently imposes no minimum reserve requirement.
"Zentralbanken einiger Länder, wie Australien, Kanada, Großbritannien oder Schweden, fordern zurzeit keine Mindestreserve."
Mindestreserve
[62] supported · reference source
The article states that a central bank can use the minimum reserve ratio to make commercial banks' lending depend on their borrowing from the central bank.
"Sie ermöglicht es der Monetären Autorität, die Geschäftsbanken bei ihrer Kreditverteilung von ihren eigenen Krediten bei der Monetären Autorität abhängig zu machen"
Translation: It enables the monetary authority to make commercial banks, in their credit allocation, dependent on their own loans from the monetary authority.
Mindestreserve-System
[63] supported · archive source
The excerpt indicates that a reserve-requirement power the authorities had not used was limited to central reserve city banks, which bears on how the requirement tiers applied to them rather than to country banks.
"had not exercised was limited to central reserve city banks. Requirements against demand deposits of these"
Monetary, credit, and fiscal policies ; A compendium of materials on monetary, credit, and fiscal policies, page 530
[64] supported · scholarly source
Country banks held 29 percent of the total assets of Fed member banks in June 1936, while central reserve city banks in New York and Chicago and reserve city banks were much larger on average.
"Country banks accounted for 29 percent of the total assets of Fed member banks in June 1936."
Did Doubling Reserve Requirements Cause the Recession of 1937-1938? A Microeconomic Approach (2011)
[65] supported · archive source
Under the amended Federal Reserve Act, country banks had to hold 7 percent of demand deposits as reserves, the lowest of the three tiers. This source describes the tiers as they stood at the time of the amendment, not during the 1930s.
"For country banks 7 per cent. of demand deposits and 3 per cent. of time deposits."
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION, page 948
[66] supported · scholarly source
Between June 1936 and June 1937, country banks' reserve deposits with the Fed rose 35 percent ($350 million), compared with a 31 percent increase for New York's central reserve city banks.
"The reserve deposits of country banks with the Fed rose 35 percent ($350 million) between June 1936 and June 1937, compared with a 31 percent increase for New York’s central reserve city banks."
Did Doubling Reserve Requirements Cause the Recession of 1937-1938? A Microeconomic Approach (2011)
[67] documented · archive source
Reserve city banks had to hold 10 percent of demand deposits as reserves under the amended requirements.
"For Reserve city banks 10 per cent. of demand deposits and 3 per cent. of time deposits."
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION, page 948
[68] supported · scholarly source
Country banks increased their holdings of government securities by $350 million and their loans by $305 million over the year to June 1937, even as their reserve-to-asset ratios stayed essentially flat.
"Moreover, country banks increased their holdings of government securities by $350 million and their loans by $305 million"
Did Doubling Reserve Requirements Cause the Recession of 1937-1938? A Microeconomic Approach (2011)
[69] documented · archive source
Central reserve city banks, the highest tier, had to hold 13 percent of demand deposits as reserves under the amended requirements.
"For Central Reserve city banks 13 per cent. of demand deposits and 3 per cent. of time deposits."
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION, page 948
[70] supported · scholarly source
The simulations indicate that country banks' reserve demands stayed flat because the fundamental determinants of their reserve demand did not prompt them to increase reserves, while the overall rise in reserve demand was driven by a subset of city banks.
"As our simulations show, country banks’ reserve demands remained flat because the fundamental determinants of their reserve demands did not prompt them to increase their reserves."
Did Doubling Reserve Requirements Cause the Recession of 1937-1938? A Microeconomic Approach (2011)
[71] supported · primary source
The Nebraska Democratic platform, written by William J. Bryan and reprinted in the Roswell Daily Record, opposed the Fowler bill along with the Aldrich bill and called for emergency currency issued and controlled by the federal government.
"We oppose the Aldrich bill and the Fowlerbill, and believe that, in insofar - sofar insofar as the needs of commerce re require - quire require an emergency currency, such currency should be issued and con controlled - trolled controlled by the federal government"
Image 2 of The Roswell daily record (Roswell, N.M.), March 7, 1908
[72] supported · scholarly source
After the FDIC was created in 1933, there were almost no bank runs, which Wilcox cites as a reason bankers would not need to hold massive excess reserves against runs after 1934.
"After the creation of the FDIC, there were almost no bank runs."
Excess Reserves in the Great Depression (1984)
[73] supported · scholarly source
The fall in interest rates can account for 80 percent of the movement of excess reserves during the Great Depression.
"The fall in interest rates can account for 80 percent of the movement of excess reserves during the Great Depression."
Excess Reserves in the Great Depression (1984)
[74] supported · niche source
The 1912 Progressive Party platform opposed the so-called Aldrich currency bill, arguing that its provisions would place the nation's currency and credit system in private hands.
"We are opposed to the so-called Aldrich currency bill, because its provisions would place our currency and credit system in private hands, not subject"
The Progressive Party and Democratic-Corporatism: The 1912 Progressive Party Platform
[75] supported · scholarly source
The 1912 Democratic Party platform explicitly opposed the so-called Aldrich bill and the establishment of a central bank.
"We oppose the so-called Aldrich bill or the establishment of a central bank,"
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES
[76] supported · scholarly source
The 1912 Democratic Party platform explicitly opposed the so-called Aldrich bill and the establishment of a central bank.
"We oppose the so-called Aldrich bill or the establishment of a central bank,"
Theodore Roosevelt, the Election of 1912, and the Founding of the Federal Reserve (2024)
[77] supported · scholarly source
Alongside its opposition to the Aldrich bill, the 1912 Democratic platform called for a systematic revision of the nation's banking laws.
"while calling for a “systematic revision of our banking laws”"
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES
[78] supported · scholarly source
The same Democratic platform called for a systematic revision of the country's banking laws rather than a central bank.
"while calling for a “systematic revision of our banking laws”"
Theodore Roosevelt, the Election of 1912, and the Founding of the Federal Reserve (2024)
[79] supported · scholarly source
The Democratic platform rejected the idea of a central bank in general and the Aldrich Plan in particular, and its victory in the 1912 election ended any chance the Aldrich bill would be reconsidered in the 63rd Congress.
"As the Democratic platform rejected the idea of a central bank generally and the Aldrich Plan specifically, the Democratic Party sweep in the 1912 election eliminated any chance of the Aldrich bill being reconsidered in the 63rd Congress."
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES
[80] supported · scholarly source
Because the Democratic platform rejected both a central bank in general and the Aldrich Plan specifically, the Democratic sweep in 1912 ended any chance the Aldrich bill would be reconsidered in the 63rd Congress.
"As the Democratic platform rejected the idea of a central bank generally and the Aldrich Plan specifically, the Democratic Party sweep in the 1912 election eliminated any chance of the Aldrich bill being reconsidered in the 63rd Congress."
Theodore Roosevelt, the Election of 1912, and the Founding of the Federal Reserve (2024)